Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,576
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    masonj4
    Newest Member
    masonj4
    Joined

January 24-26: Miracle or Mirage Thread 2


mappy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, stormtracker said:

Looks to be begining to phase/interact more at 45 but it's still further west and less so than 18z

Wonder if we actually want the phase further west or further east. I think further east is better as it gives it less time to pump the ridge in front? Conversely, a further west phase may leave more energy behind so who knows.

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SnowenOutThere said:

So the heres a run of the euro from way back when it had the snow max in southern virginia...

500hv.conus.png

Here is the 0z NAM

500hv.conus.png

Clearly they are not the same setup. Need to see how that NS entering the Pac NW interacts with it. Additionally, the huge jumps north are from a different NS lobe that only enters our viewing angle at hour 60. 

The northern stream feature on that Euro run was likely much different from what most guidance is showing now. It has really trended west in the last 2 days.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SnowenOutThere said:

Wonder if we actually want the phase further west or further east. I think further east is better as it gives it less time to pump the ridge in front? Conversely, a further west phase may leave more energy behind so who knows.

I was just contemplating the same and yes, farther east. May make for a shorter duration system but will limit the heights rising and mix threat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ralph Wiggum said:

I was just contemplating the same and yes, farther east. May make for a shorter duration system but will limit the heights rising and mix threat

True, but I wonder if having the SW come east quicker just raises the ability for it to phase while if it stays west long enough the NS will interfere destructively. Honestly I have no idea anymore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SnowenOutThere said:

True, but I wonder if having the SW come east quicker just raises the ability for it to phase while if it stays west long enough the NS will interfere destructively. Honestly I have no idea anymore. 

We just need a partial phase not full. Grab some of the sw energy but trail some behind as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SnowenOutThere said:

Wonder if we actually want the phase further west or further east. I think further east is better as it gives it less time to pump the ridge in front? Conversely, a further west phase may leave more energy behind so who knows.

We really want the confluence to be stronger and the high to stick around for longer. That will give us the long duration blizzard we all want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SnowenOutThere said:

True, but I wonder if having the SW come east quicker just raises the ability for it to phase while if it stays west long enough the NS will interfere destructively. Honestly I have no idea anymore. 

I don’t get paid to do this, but that map says (and has said) to me that suppression/sheared is still the more likely outcome. But if it cuts to Detroit, then I was just kidding.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Solution Man said:

Looks like TWC ingested the data as they are honking about 1-2 ft in our area. They gotta keep viewers 

That’s literally the only place I get my weather. Good to know! But I could use a change. Man, if only there were some cool-ass, like-minded weather nerds out there—ranging in age from fresh baby diapers all the way to Depends—who actually knew what they were talking about. Anyone have an idea where I might find something like that? :lol::lol:

  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SnowenOutThere said:

Wonder if we actually want the phase further west or further east. I think further east is better as it gives it less time to pump the ridge in front? Conversely, a further west phase may leave more energy behind so who knows.

None of us know, lol.  I guess we're about to find some things out.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Nomz said:

I would not encourage the level of NAM extrapolation that I'm seeing right now. Go say your final goodbyes before we all have a mass aneurysm over the 00z suite.

Not sure anybody is extrapolating as we all are admitting we don't know what we're looking for, but rather just talking about what we're looking AT

  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Nomz said:

I would not encourage the level of NAM extrapolation that I'm seeing right now. Go say your final goodbyes before we all have a mass aneurysm over the 00z suite.

The nam is just our dry run for the globals.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, nj2va said:

The NS at H51 is also a bit west of 18z so I wonder if they offset.  I have no clue what to look for as others have stated.

I would think that’s not a good thing. If both of those pieces are slower, it gives more time for the confluence to move out and room for this thing to come pretty far north.

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LVblizzard said:

I would think that’s not a good thing. If both of those pieces are slower, it gives more time for the confluence to move out and room for this thing to come pretty far north.

The confluence is worse as well. Look at the position of the 50/50 in that animation above. I mean its the NAM. But I think you are right and it ends up north. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...