cleetussnow Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago Ruh roh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycsnow Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago Just now, SACRUS said: RRFS (Next-Generation Replacement) Core dynamics FV3 (Finite-Volume Cubed-Sphere) Same dynamical core as modern GFS Part of NOAA’s Unified Forecast System (UFS) Grid / algorithm Unstructured cubed-sphere grid Variable resolution No lateral boundary conditions Seamless global → regional scaling Yea it’s gonna replace it eventually, but it’s still unknown if it’s good or not it’s a prototype at this stage still I believe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, nycsnow said: Yea it’s gonna replace it eventually, but it’s still unknown if it’s good or not it’s a prototype at this stage still I believe? Yes but the core is based more on the GFS systems 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 12z RRFS Total QPF Total Snow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mulen Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Been along time since I viewed this board go all the way back to the TWC days good look dudes no snow googles been in Florida 10 yrs so I watch from afar . 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hudsonvalley21 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 26 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said: On a more serious note regarding the NAM, the RGEM's high-resolution model and most of the global models use 4dVAR (four-dimensional variation) initialization. The NAM uses the older 3dVAR (three-dimensional variation) initialization. The general idea of warmer air moving in to change the snow to sleet in coastal areas and the New York City area and its nearby suburbs is the baseline idea due to lots of support. It's uncertain whether the NAM is overdoing things on account of its older initialization scheme or if it sees something the other guidance doesn't. If it begins to adjust late today (18z or later), that could be an indication that the older initialization process was playing a role. If, on the other hand, the other guidance starts shifting, that will indicate that the NAM, despite its limitations, had correctly resolved some of the details ahead of the other guidance. Another thought Don is the start time to what the models are showing. The cold dry air in place might hold off for the snow to reach the surface for some time more till the columns saturate especially points north of NYC. Currently 7/-8 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 9 minutes ago, SACRUS said: 12z RRFS (new / replace NAM) Snow by 3/4AM Snow through 2PM before mixing with sleet Yeah, if there's sleet pushing to I-80 in PA then all the way to Hartford NYC is screwed for any kind of big event. Again it's one possible outcome but the other cold models need to hold on today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 1/24 12z ICON Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hooralph Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago The NAM is the Aaron Rodgers of models Clearly ready for the exit Was always flawed but racked up some big wins in its career Problematic in ways that distract from its strengths (but fans like it for being "contrarian") People vigorously rooting for it to lose Still capable of some key plays that make it impossible to write off 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 12z ICON Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU848789 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Just caught up and surprisingly, didn't see the NWS snow/ice maps, so here they are. I had also summarized all of the NWS-Philly/NYC warnings elsewhere, so sharing them here. Nice to see the NWS finally bringing snowfall forecasts in line with the models and most other forecasters - I think a general 8-12" of snow and sleet for most S of 78 and more N of there and NE through NYC and the LHV/CT is pretty good. The NWS has me at 11.9" of snow/sleet, which I think is still a little high, so I'll go with 10.4" for Metuchen. NWS-Philly Counties For Sussex-Warren-Carbon-Monroe-Lehigh-Northampton, the warning is for 11-15" of snow/sleet, but no freezing rain (ZR) For counties in PA/NJ south of 78 (except coastal counties south of Ocean), i.e.,Hunterdon-Somerset-Middlesex-Monmouth-Mercer-Salem-Gloucester-Camden-Burlington-Ocean-Cumberland-Berks-Delaware-Philadelphia-Chester-Montgomery (and Newcastle/Kent in DE), the warnings are for 7-13" of snow and sleet with up to 0.3" of freezing rain accretion, especially SW of Trenton as per the ice map below. For Atlantic/Cape May counties and southern DE, the warning is for 4-8" of snow/sleet plus about 0.1" ZR NWS-NYC Counties For W. Passaic, the entire Hudson Valley and the coastal CT counties, the warning is for 12-16" of snow For NENJ (Union/Essex/Hudson/Bergen/E Passaic), NYC and LI, the warning is for 10-14" snow/sleet plus a light glaze of ZR 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allgame830 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, SACRUS said: Definitely way colder than the NAM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donsutherland1 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, hudsonvalley21 said: Another thought Don is the start time to what the models are showing. The cold dry air in place might hold off for the snow to reach the surface for some time more till the columns saturate especially points north of NYC. Currently 7/-8 Yes. I agree. The steady snow might not arrive in the Hudson Valley until 13z or 14z (northern Hudson Valley). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestBabylonWeather Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago If this continues the 11” forecast at islip from NWS is going to lower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 1/24 12z ICON Total QPF Total Snow / Sleet (10:1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU848789 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, donsutherland1 said: Yes. I agree. The steady snow might not arrive in the Hudson Valley until 13z or 14z (northern Hudson Valley). Damn, now we have to worry about the sun angle...at 15F, lol. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 1/24 14z RAP has snow starting around 4/5 AM 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycsnow Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Icon is colder than nam and in nyc area it’s only .5- inch different from 06z so I’d say it held steady?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 8 minutes ago, mulen said: Been along time since I viewed this board go all the way back to the TWC days good look dudes no snow googles been in Florida 10 yrs so I watch from afar . We were talking about you and others in the obs thread a few days ago Glad to see you seeya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJwx85 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Honestly, while the threat for sleet at the end is increasing somewhat, many here are way overreacting. Take a compromise and you get one heck of a snowstorm for just about everyone. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WIN Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Regardless of which models are right, it appears we're in for a general 6 to 12 inch snowfall before any mix/change. I cannot believe that so many are miserable about that. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILoveWinter Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Just now, SACRUS said: Queue the "it's still snowing in Nashville and it was supposed to changeover to sleet already so that's a good sign for us" posts lol 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gravitylover Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 12 minutes ago, mulen said: Been along time since I viewed this board go all the way back to the TWC days good look dudes no snow googles been in Florida 10 yrs so I watch from afar . It's good to see ya dude! Hope all is well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astoriaweather Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 6 minutes ago, WIN said: Regardless of which models are right, it appears we're in for a general 6 to 12 inch snowfall before any mix/change. I cannot believe that so many are miserable about that. I am thinking 5 to 8 in NYC, but at this point I will be satisfied with that, especially if the sleet helps it form into a glacier afterwards. . I guess my one worry is that things just keep trending bad until game time and even 5 is not within reach in the urban, coastal core. Hope I am wrong. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eduggs Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 58 minutes ago, MJO812 said: We shall see. Nam can be amped but cant discount it since this is a new run. We go through this so often. And people cover their eyes and ears beforehand and pretend it didn't happen afterwards. When the NAM shows sleet it sleets. And the extent is usually north of where the 3rd party vendor graphics show it. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eduggs Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago This reminds me a lot of December 16/17 2020. I don't think the public freakout was as over-the-top for that one... but then again, people didn't have the apple weather app yet I don't think. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astoriaweather Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Besides the thermals, I guess I also worry that the storm ends up moving past us even faster than models suggest it will. It seems that often ends up happening, unless its a prolonged overrunning or crawling coastal. There have been plenty of times where we expect storms to last 12 hours but in reality they pass by in about 8 to 10. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now