Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,468
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    kmsrocknj
    Newest Member
    kmsrocknj
    Joined

January 2026 Medium/Long Range Discussion


snowfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, mitchnick said:

6z is a much better dive south than 0z for the 20th.

ecmwf_z500_vort_us_50.png

ecmwf_z500_vort_us_49.png

Yeah but the big difference(on both 0z and 6z) is later towards the 18th. Ideally it would be more like the 18z run wrt the energy(vorticity ribbon) riding overtop the ridge phasing in early. The biggest improvement on the 6z run over 0z imo is it doesnt leave a ball of energy behind parked in the SW.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, mitchnick said:

Just like last year, and probably more so, southern Canada continues to get crushed. Thanks La Niña. 

snku_acc-imp.conus.png

Yea,  the southern stream just isn’t there when we need it. Looks like we’re dealing with Miller Bs next week. Meh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CAPE said:

6z compared to 18z-

1768683600-jKytkddwRNc.png

1768694400-IkxLcb7Xzyg.png

I dunno. This may be moving away from the previous looks of an overunning thing with stj involved and turn into mostly NS based Ala my post about the Manitoba Mauler look. Neither is a monster storm look but both solutions are pretty standard ways we can cash in with a 3-5ish type thing. Guess we get the next 2 systems out the way and see which form it decides to take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Ralph Wiggum said:

I dunno. This may be moving away from the previous looks of an overunning thing and turn into mostly NS based Ala my post about the Manitoba Mauler look. Neither is a monster storm look but both solutions are pretty standard ways we can cash in with a 3-5ish type thing. Guess we get the next 2 systems out the way and see which form it decides to take.

That's the way it goes with model simulations- previous cycles were likely incorrect with the outcome and as we go forward we get closer to what that will actually be.

And I am fine with a moderate snowfall or 2. All I really expected out of this period. This doesnt look like a 'big dog' pattern to me, but not impossible to get a bigger storm if all the elements interact in just the right way at the right time. Given the lack of blocking that sort of outcome likely increases the risk of rain.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, CAPE said:

That's the way it goes with model simulations- previous cycles were likely incorrect with the outcome and as we go forward we get closer to what that will actually be.

And I am fine with a moderate snowfall or 2. All I really expected out of this period. This doesnt look like a 'big dog' pattern to me, but not impossible to get a bigger storm if all the elements interact in just the right way at the right time. Given the lack of blocking that sort of outcome likely increases the risk of rain.

Yeah, aside from no blocking, this isn’t a SS wave models can see coming half a globe away. It’s more of a NS wave digging far enough south to *maybe* give us something 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

Yeah, aside from no blocking, this isn’t a SS wave models can see coming half a globe away. It’s more of a NS wave digging far enough south to *maybe* give us something 

Ensemble guidance isn't overly excited, at least not yet. Some recent runs have been hinting, but overall a weakish signal. Still about 10 days out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JenkinsJinkies said:

A significant portion of it does.

No. We have...big personalities that make it seem like that. Because everyone chats about what BPs say and think. By the numbers, I'll bet you actual money the majority in the forum are not "all or nothing", which is the expression you used.

  • Like 1
  • 100% 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CAPE said:

I think there are plenty of people here who just want some snow. 

Yep. My bar is roads and grass covered in the inner burbs. Cold during and after, enough to sled on, sticks around for a few days. So like 3" min, ideally 4"-6". No slop, no mixing, just a decent small snowstorm. Big dog hunting is not a productive hobby. Last years 4" storms in January were perfect examples of this (and in 2024 too).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WxUSAF said:

Gut instinct is that our best reasonable hope for Thursday/Friday is some widespread light snow with the upper level shortwave passage. This is pretty much the euro-ai solution. 

 

2 hours ago, WxUSAF said:

I mean, 6z isn’t too far off that idea actually 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, CAPE said:

I think there are plenty of people here who just want some snow. 

Based off of what I’ve seen here a 2-4”/3-5” event is still on the table.

Even on the low end of that it’ll be enough to not have to add to the futility list (Baltimore is actually already at the point where it won’t make the list). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Interstate said:

I don’t know why everyone doesn’t use pivotal weather. It is free and has all the models now. 

I preferred TT because I though that Pivotal didnt have the slider animation feature.. but I realized just a couple of weeks ago that you can set Pivotal to the slider by choosing animation -> forecast loop at the top of the map. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...