CAPE Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago 21 minutes ago, WxUSAF said: I mean, 6z isn’t too far off that idea actually Yeah no phase but it looks like a 2-4/ 3-5" deal with the UL energy rolling through. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Wiggum Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago 6z euro is better upstairs but still too late to develop for the 15th. Has a vigorous Manitoba Mauler diving into the upper mid west on its heels. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interstate Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Ji said: Randy gets SV for free and it’s supposed to be faster Yeah because it misses frames. It is like the government job report. Get it out as fast as they can only to fill in the blanks later. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JenkinsJinkies Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago 4 minutes ago, CAPE said: Yeah no phase but it looks like a 2-4/ 3-5" deal with the UL energy rolling through. Will be enough to mothball the futility thread for the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPE Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago 6z a little closer to something for the 18th as it involves some of the energy in the SW instead of leaving it all behind like the 0z run 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPE Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago Still need to get that NS vorticity dropping in over the ridge to get involved earlier. 18z was close to the outcome I envisioned for the window around the 20th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago 6z is a much better dive south than 0z for the 20th. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPE Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago 1 hour ago, mitchnick said: 6z is a much better dive south than 0z for the 20th. Yeah but the big difference(on both 0z and 6z) is later towards the 18th. Ideally it would be more like the 18z run wrt the energy(vorticity ribbon) riding overtop the ridge phasing in early. The biggest improvement on the 6z run over 0z imo is it doesnt leave a ball of energy behind parked in the SW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPE Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago 6z compared to 18z- 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87storms Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago 7 hours ago, mitchnick said: Just like last year, and probably more so, southern Canada continues to get crushed. Thanks La Niña. Yea, the southern stream just isn’t there when we need it. Looks like we’re dealing with Miller Bs next week. Meh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Wiggum Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago 13 minutes ago, CAPE said: 6z compared to 18z- I dunno. This may be moving away from the previous looks of an overunning thing with stj involved and turn into mostly NS based Ala my post about the Manitoba Mauler look. Neither is a monster storm look but both solutions are pretty standard ways we can cash in with a 3-5ish type thing. Guess we get the next 2 systems out the way and see which form it decides to take. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPE Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Ralph Wiggum said: I dunno. This may be moving away from the previous looks of an overunning thing and turn into mostly NS based Ala my post about the Manitoba Mauler look. Neither is a monster storm look but both solutions are pretty standard ways we can cash in with a 3-5ish type thing. Guess we get the next 2 systems out the way and see which form it decides to take. That's the way it goes with model simulations- previous cycles were likely incorrect with the outcome and as we go forward we get closer to what that will actually be. And I am fine with a moderate snowfall or 2. All I really expected out of this period. This doesnt look like a 'big dog' pattern to me, but not impossible to get a bigger storm if all the elements interact in just the right way at the right time. Given the lack of blocking that sort of outcome likely increases the risk of rain. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terpeast Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago 32 minutes ago, CAPE said: That's the way it goes with model simulations- previous cycles were likely incorrect with the outcome and as we go forward we get closer to what that will actually be. And I am fine with a moderate snowfall or 2. All I really expected out of this period. This doesnt look like a 'big dog' pattern to me, but not impossible to get a bigger storm if all the elements interact in just the right way at the right time. Given the lack of blocking that sort of outcome likely increases the risk of rain. Yeah, aside from no blocking, this isn’t a SS wave models can see coming half a globe away. It’s more of a NS wave digging far enough south to *maybe* give us something 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPE Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Terpeast said: Yeah, aside from no blocking, this isn’t a SS wave models can see coming half a globe away. It’s more of a NS wave digging far enough south to *maybe* give us something Ensemble guidance isn't overly excited, at least not yet. Some recent runs have been hinting, but overall a weakish signal. Still about 10 days out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JenkinsJinkies Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago 41 minutes ago, CAPE said: This doesnt look like a 'big dog' pattern to me, I brought this up the other day but this forum has a huge “all or nothing” mentality problem. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kay Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago Just now, JenkinsJinkies said: I brought this up the other day but this forum has a huge “all or nothing” mentality problem. It's really not the whole forum. 3 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JenkinsJinkies Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago Just now, Kay said: It's really not the whole forum. A significant portion of it does. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPE Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago 1 minute ago, JenkinsJinkies said: I brought this up the other day but this forum has a huge “all or nothing” mentality problem. I think there are plenty of people here who just want some snow. 4 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kay Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago Just now, JenkinsJinkies said: A significant portion of it does. No. We have...big personalities that make it seem like that. Because everyone chats about what BPs say and think. By the numbers, I'll bet you actual money the majority in the forum are not "all or nothing", which is the expression you used. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paleocene Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago 3 minutes ago, CAPE said: I think there are plenty of people here who just want some snow. Yep. My bar is roads and grass covered in the inner burbs. Cold during and after, enough to sled on, sticks around for a few days. So like 3" min, ideally 4"-6". No slop, no mixing, just a decent small snowstorm. Big dog hunting is not a productive hobby. Last years 4" storms in January were perfect examples of this (and in 2024 too). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxUSAF Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago 3 hours ago, WxUSAF said: Gut instinct is that our best reasonable hope for Thursday/Friday is some widespread light snow with the upper level shortwave passage. This is pretty much the euro-ai solution. 2 hours ago, WxUSAF said: I mean, 6z isn’t too far off that idea actually 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Wiggum Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago 15 minutes ago, JenkinsJinkies said: A significant portion of it does. Really only a handful of the usual suspects tbh. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JenkinsJinkies Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago 26 minutes ago, CAPE said: I think there are plenty of people here who just want some snow. Based off of what I’ve seen here a 2-4”/3-5” event is still on the table. Even on the low end of that it’ll be enough to not have to add to the futility list (Baltimore is actually already at the point where it won’t make the list). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago Hmmm 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDScienceTeacher Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago 3 hours ago, Interstate said: I don’t know why everyone doesn’t use pivotal weather. It is free and has all the models now. I preferred TT because I though that Pivotal didnt have the slider animation feature.. but I realized just a couple of weeks ago that you can set Pivotal to the slider by choosing animation -> forecast loop at the top of the map. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSSN+ Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago 8 minutes ago, yoda said: Hmmm Looks similar to 6z gfs at surface. Low over Delaware with some snow over us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solution Man Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago Just now, TSSN+ said: Looks similar to 6z gfs at surface. Low over Delaware with some snow over us. 2-4…3-5 type. We take it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago Icon has snow with both threats, the latter dropping more. Nothing huge with either or combined. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago That's a beast on the Icon at 180 imho. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eskimo Joe Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago 2 minutes ago, mitchnick said: That's a beast on the Icon at 180 imho. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now