Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,450
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Rnt1969
    Newest Member
    Rnt1969
    Joined

January 2026 regional war/obs/disco thread


Baroclinic Zone
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Sey-Mour Snow said:

Wasn’t going on a limb there.. A west based monster block was modeled for days. Since then the mega blocking has back off, so that idea is fading. It happen.. What’s your forecast just hiding behind your computer and calling out others? Or do you have one? 

You might’ve been reading something into my tone.  I’m not defending a troll, just pointing out that the pattern might be similar to what he said.  I think it might be briefly.  I don’t have any knowledge really to make a forecast except to say that Jan 10 to January 24 it’s more likely to be cold and snowy for the MA straight up into NE.

I appreciate what you do on here and sorry for any misunderstanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sey-Mour Snow said:

What’s hard to understand? 

Why are you engaging with QG? He hasn't been an honest actor since his handle was noreaster27 in the early days 12+ years ago. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • 100% 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, mahk_webstah said:

You might’ve been reading something into my tone.  I’m not defending a troll, just pointing out that the pattern might be similar to what he said.  I think it might be briefly.  I don’t have any knowledge really to make a forecast except to say that Jan 10 to January 24 it’s more likely to be cold and snowy for the MA straight up into NE.

I appreciate what you do on here and sorry for any misunderstanding.

My bad yes 100% misread that and you are right.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sey-Mour Snow said:

ya funny thing is after trending for days to a massive west based block, we all knew the second it lost it , it wasn't coming back.. 

The medium to long range skepticism cuts both ways for me. While the bias has been toward too much punching up warmth, we have to watch those exotic cold/favorable solutions too. Models just seem a step above rudderless imo.

  • Like 4
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

The medium to long range skepticism cuts both ways for me. While the bias has been toward too much punching up warmth, we have to watch those exotic cold/favorable solutions too. Models just seem a step above rudderless imo.

Yes for sure. Can’t trust anything out there in the medium even. And the long range, flip a coin maybe :axe:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OP Euro today is kind of weak sauce on warmup as well. Not as much as Skynet....it does get pretty mild for a couple days, but no torching cutters....the 1/10 system bombs into the lakes but is more like a SWFE with snow/ice in CNE/NNE....SNE might be mixed to 35F rain in that scenario. But it just shows there's a lot of uncertainty even in a mild-ish longwave pattern. Early January is a good time to try and get away with a warmer longwave pattern. 

  • Like 4
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WxWatcher007 said:

The medium to long range skepticism cuts both ways for me. While the bias has been toward too much punching up warmth, we have to watch those exotic cold/favorable solutions too. Models just seem a step above rudderless imo.

I think a valuable lesson sometimes I forget too is regardless of the pattern modeled,  if there is an outlier amongst the big three ensembles, you can't just toss it, regardless of model biases.  The GEFS never really bit on the mega west based block, we assumed it would trend towards the EPS as it usually does, however the opposite ended up being true.  When a highly anomalous pattern is modeled, we need to see all three major ensembles on board for a few days for me to believe it. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said:

Ill have to check it out. Anything's better than Direct Weather guy. I just checked that channel since about a year ago and looking at his recently thumbnails make me want to throw up. 

Ya…he’s a bit much. Everything is a bomb. And Major Major impact and implications. Lol…hyping it up for sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Sey-Mour Snow said:

Lol ya me and wolfie are BFF's now 

I’m liking the new and more assertive/confident Seymour.  You’ve blossomed into a knowledgeable, insightful MET.  I’m honestly not trying to sound condescending, but I’m proud of you pal. I mean that sincerely. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sey-Mour Snow said:

I think a valuable lesson sometimes I forget too is regardless of the pattern modeled,  if there is an outlier amongst the big three ensembles, you can't just toss it, regardless of model biases.  The GEFS never really bit on the mega west based block, we assumed it would trend towards the EPS as it usually does, however the opposite ended up being true.  When a highly anomalous pattern is modeled, we need to see all three major ensembles on board for a few days for me to believe it. 

You were NAO'ed  :lol:

Heh... 'not the first time anyone was, whence seemingly waiting on the commitment by the analyst, that's when NAO fails to show up. Intention? Charlie Browning - 

Personally I find the NAO to be the biggest most stochastic POS voodoo index that was ever defined.  The problems in using it are textured and varied. 

Firstly, ( I'm not intending to lecture you; I'm just raging at the moment lol) is that it is actually created by the dispersion mechanics downstream off the Pacific -N/A wholesale wave signature.  [ Enter pita flop computing power here ...] and viola! the NAO emerges in the guidance... 

Secondly, there are two behaviors, which is a major pain in the ass.  The first is the obvious: blocking, identified by the geometry of the heights up there in the NAO geographic domain space.   The other form is insidiously hidden - the hemispheric logistics around the region act as though that geometric identity must be there, when one is not very obviously defined...  See, this is an indirect proof that the forcing actual coming from somewhere else.  Whether heights bloom within that behavior or not, that's when the EOF calculations finally give negative numerical values.    

Anyway, so the NAO is so badly handled ...or, so much worse so than the other indexes, because it is at the flop end of the Pacific hose, where is complexity is also then exacerbated further by interaction across the N/A continent.  In fact, it's probably more useful for when it does materialize on a D10 chart up there, to just correlate it to a period of uncertainty from the Pacific -

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The suppressed Bermuda ridge is likely to introduce some challenges if/when it is there and this affair up in the -EPO --> N/A deep SPV sets up, but excluding that for a moment..   this, to me, has fundamentally more potential for winter event genesis. 

image.png.babe10d4c536539e12be9c6b0d940828.png  oh ... it's the la-la range GEFs, but they all have this look fwiw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...