Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,468
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    kmsrocknj
    Newest Member
    kmsrocknj
    Joined

January 2026 OBS and Discussion


TriPol
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, CPcantmeasuresnow said:

Until the last five years single digit snowfall totals even in NYC were very rare. I don't have the stats in front of me but I'm pretty certain through 2018 it was less than 8 in 150 years. 

There were 3 1970 to 1999. 4 if you throw in 2001/2002. 

1996 through 1999 was 10.0, 5.5, 12.7, 16.3.  Throw in 2001 to 2002 of 3.5 and that is a terrible stretch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said:

There were plenty of extremely warm winters and below 10 inch seasons. I literally lived them. I am seeing the exact same thing but a couple degrees warmer.

that last sentence is important and needs to be acknowledged more. these winters are warmer and with less snow than they would have been 20 years ago. 94-95 today could have been a shutout or single digit snowfall. The 2020s have the worst avg snowfall in recorded NYC history. Lets see if that changes

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, the_other_guy said:

that last sentence is important and needs to be acknowledged more. these winters are warmer and with less snow than they would have been 20 years ago. 94-95 today could have been a shutout or single digit snowfall. The 2020s have the worst avg snowfall in recorded NYC history. Lets see if that changes

 

We would need some very good snow seasons in order to surpass the worst average snowfall in recorded NYC history. A very tall ask in a warming world 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eduggs said:

A caution flag on relying on ensembles for next week. First I should say that I'm a big fan of ensemble modeling. But there is a theory that they do not perform well with explosive and anomalous trof amplification. Seeing the GFS operational at only 5 days out with its superior resolution have virtually no support from its ensembles for more than one run should raise a caution flag. Add to that the GFS-AI and ECM-AI which tend to dampen waves compared to operational models looking more amplified than the CMC, UK, and ECM. It is possible that a relatively fine-scale shortwave with embedded vorticity might contribute to rapid amplification that is not well resolved by ensemble modeling. I would not be so bold as to predict this. But I think it's something to consider.

This shortwave feature may not be well resolved by ensembles. It is what triggers the explosive amplification and the mid-level cutoff on the GFS (and 12z ICON).

gfs_z500_vort_us_16.thumb.jpg.342fef704e1546e6e129107c0c322b3f.jpg

gfs-ens_z500a_us_16.thumb.jpg.f91288d0a8abb194641bead644f1ed62.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the main differences between the GFS and the ECMWF are that the kicker on the ECMWF is more defined, hurting amplification, and the TPV is also closer to the trough. we'll see how those features trend

overall, though, they are actually pretty similar from a synoptic standpoint now

ezgif-79c6122544e67254.thumb.gif.f3e82df72eb62fca5d9496aad7b44cf9.gif

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Krs4Lfe said:

This is still the long range imo. The mid range is when models will really identify all key players and start to resolve all the vortices flying around. That's usually when the rug pull happens. Not saying it will happen this time, but we've seen storms go poof (especially over the past 6 years) because of all the energy flying around that isn't properly resolved until we get closer in time.

It's under 120 hrs. I wouldn't call that long range 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

EPS and GEFS definitely not as robust as the operationals, neither is the EURO AI. Waiting on GEPS

GEPS not biting. Handles the energy north of New England completely differently.

Liked the movement towards some more amped members on the EPS/GEFS from their previous runs. Have to see a few more cycles. Definitely need to thread the needle to see something substantial. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Lucy Pull said:

GEPS not biting. Handles the energy north of New England completely differently.

Liked the movement towards some more amped members on the EPS/GEFS from their previous runs. Have to see a few more cycles. Definitely need to thread the needle to see something substantial. 

Correct. The EPS and GEFS for sure are not as enthused as the operationals and the GEPS definitely isn’t enthused. Even the EURO AI was much less robust than the op EURO

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People do realize that making a thread on an "event" early has no bearing on how that event pans out, don't they?  It only impacts how posters react to the outcome from that event.  I like early threads, simply because it makes it easier to keep all the relevant posts on that event in one thread, as opposed to having them dispersed throughout other long range posts.  Just my $0.02.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...