Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,214
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

September 2025 OBS-Discussion centered NYC subforum


wdrag
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, cleetussnow said:

Trynna picture what happened between the 2nd and third frame lol

 A fantastic gymnastic move. Pulling the hoodie over with her hands, jumping up and inserting her feet in the hood while still holding on, then flipping out of it. I was not skilled enough to capture the brief video (a grandchild wasn’t with me). The best I could do was the screen shots. The young lady was amazing. As always ….. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TheClimateChanger said:

Yeah, but I follow A LOT of places. For the past decades/years, coop sites would routinely own all of the coldest statewide low temperatures. A lot of people referred to it as an "airport heat effect" but I'm seeing lots of airport sites now in the mix for coldest regional/state lows. They are doing WAY better when it comes to radiating heat away with these new sensors. I can see it with my own two eyes. I'm in the middle of the woods and the airport surrounded by concrete is routinely now seeing low temperatures as low as mine when it used to be several degrees hotter. That's not due to drought.

I haven’t heard any information suggesting that the new sensors being installed at the airports have an inherent cold bias during radiational cooling events.

The coldest temperature in NJ since late August wasn’t from an airport but at the Walpack ,NJ climate station. Plus KFOK which is at an airport has always been a great radiational cooling spot out in the Hamptons.

So very cold readings at airports which happen to located in great radiational cooling locations like the Pine Barrens with sandy soil have been a common occurrence long before the new sensors began to get rolled out. 
 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tomorrow will be variably cloudy with a few showers possible in places. Highs will top out mainly in the upper 60s. Thursday could be briefly warmer with highs in the upper 70s to perhaps lower 80s. 

A scattered shower or thundershower is possible Thursday night into Friday as a cold front pushes through.

September 1-15 is on track to achieve a solid cool anomaly. Since 2000, there have been nine years that saw a cooler than normal first half of September. Two-thirds of those years went on to record a warmer than normal second half of September. Only two of those years (2017 and 2019) wound up with a monthly mean temperature of 70.0° or above. Overall, for two-thirds of those years, the cool start was sufficiently cool to produce a cooler than normal monthly anomaly. The last year that saw both a cooler than normal first half and second half of September was 2009. Prior to that, it was 2001. The last year to record a cooler than normal first half of September followed by a warmer than normal September was 2024.

The ENSO Region 1+2 anomaly was -0.3°C and the Region 3.4 anomaly was -0.4°C for the week centered around August 27. For the past six weeks, the ENSO Region 1+2 anomaly has averaged +0.33°C and the ENSO Region 3.4 anomaly has averaged -0.32°C. La Niña conditions will likely develop during mid- or late-autumn.

The SOI was -13.78 today. 

The preliminary Arctic Oscillation (AO) was +0.461 today. 

Based on sensitivity analysis applied to the latest guidance, there is an implied near 59% probability that New York City will have a cooler than normal September (1991-2020 normal). September will likely finish with a mean temperature near 68.3° (0.9° below normal). 

Supplemental Information: The projected mean would be 0.3° above the 1981-2010 normal monthly value.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bluewave said:

I haven’t heard any information suggesting that the new sensors being installed at the airports have an inherent cold bias during radiational cooling events.

The coldest temperature in NJ since late August wasn’t from an airport but at the Walpack ,NJ climate station. Plus KFOK which is at an airport has always been a great radiational cooling spot out in the Hamptons.

So very cold readings at airports which happen to located in great radiational cooling locations like the Pine Barrens with sandy soil have been a common occurrence long before the new sensors began to get rolled out. 
 

 

Walpack at 36 is wild to me. Im 50 miles East and woke up to a balmy 55. The woods are a cold, cold place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, BobbyHolikWillFindYou said:

Walpack at 36 is wild to me. Im 50 miles East and woke up to a balmy 55. The woods are a cold, cold place.

The Delaware Water Gap area is a beautiful part of NJ. It’s too bad we don’t have a continuous record there going back as long as some of the other Sussex County observing sites.

The Sussex airport has continuous records in August online going back to 2001. This August featured the lowest monthly reading of 43°. The old COOP which was nearby stoped posting data a few years ago. So it looks like it may have closed.

Both the COOP and airport were operational back in August 2006. The airport had a low of 45° and the COOP 46°. Prior to the airport readings going online back around 2001, the coldest August reading at the Sussex COOP was 34° back in 1965.

So if Walpack was 7° colder than the Sussex COOP back in 1965, then it could have fallen to around 27° in that much colder valley area than around the Sussex COOP and airport. 

Parts of NY and PA were also in the upper 20s during August 1965. That was the worst drought around the region in hundreds of years. 
 

Monthly Data for August 1965 for New Jersey
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
NEWTON COOP 34
SUSSEX 1 NW COOP 34
CHARLOTTEBURG RESERVOIR COOP 35
HIGH POINT PARK COOP 35
BOONTON 1 SE COOP 36
LAYTON 2 COOP 36
INDIAN MILLS 2 W COOP 37
PEMBERTON COOP 37
FLEMINGTON 5 NNW COOP 37
LONG VALLEY COOP 37
MORRIS PLAINS 1 W COOP 37
TOMS RIVER COOP 38
CHATSWORTH COOP 39
ESSEX FELLS SERVICE BLDG COOP 39
WANAQUE RAYMOND DAM COOP 39
BELLEPLAIN STA FOREST COOP 40
ATLANTIC CITY INTL AP WBAN 40
HIGHTSTOWN 2 W COOP 40
LAMBERTVILLE COOP 40
NEW MONMOUTH COOP 40
CANOE BROOK COOP 40
BELVIDERE COOP 40
Atlantic City Area ThreadEx 40
Belvidere Area ThreadEx 40
SOMERVILLE 4 NW COOP 41

 

Monthly Data for August 1965 for New York
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
ELIZABETHTOWN COOP 26
SPECULATOR COOP 27
ANGELICA COOP 27
SLIDE MOUNTAIN COOP 28
FRANKLINVILLE COOP 28
ONEONTA 3 SE COOP 29
ROXBURY COOP 29

 

Monthly Data for August 1965 for Pennsylvania
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
COUDERSPORT 4 NW COOP 27
AUSTINBURG 2 W COOP 28
KANE 1NNE COOP 30
LAWRENCEVILLE 2 S COOP 30
FRANCIS E WALTER DAM COOP 31
ENGLISH CENTER COOP 31
MILANVILLE COOP 31
EAST STROUDSBURG COOP 32
KARTHAUS (RIVER) COOP 32
EMPORIUM 1 N COOP 32
CLERMONT 8 SW COOP 32
BRADFORD 4SW RES 5 COOP 32
TOBYHANNA POCONO MOUNTAIN ARPT WBAN 32
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, bluewave said:

I haven’t heard any information suggesting that the new sensors being installed at the airports have an inherent cold bias during radiational cooling events.

The coldest temperature in NJ since late August wasn’t from an airport but at the Walpack ,NJ climate station. Plus KFOK which is at an airport has always been a great radiational cooling spot out in the Hamptons.

So very cold readings at airports which happen to located in great radiational cooling locations like the Pine Barrens with sandy soil have been a common occurrence long before the new sensors began to get rolled out. 
 

I looked for a bit the other day and was unsuccessful in trying to find a list of what sensors have been replaced. I’m interested in KMGJ right up the road. I found data on when the old equipment was installed, and it was old, but the file that was supposed to be an updated list of the replacement dates was blank. If you come across anything g please share, thanks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...