Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Impressive signal is just beginning emerge in actual guidance, Mar 10 -15th...


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

if we can get that ULL sitting over BC to buckle and interact with the ULL in the Pacific and buckle the PNA... would be explosive. that's pretty much what the ECMWF did

Hugely agree there ( bold)...As I was just expressing to OceanStWx  ( Eric? I think it is -), I feel the primary sensitivity more relates to that handling. there is a change in the larger scaled wave exertion arriving from the d(PNA).  

when have the models ever been extraordinarily clever when it comes to handling a mode shift. 

image.png.238e38619fcb0f97319197056dab83ad.png  ....this is yesterday(left) vs last night's(right) PNA ...it is showing both d(PNA) and +d(trend)

This event really is an Archembault, ( after that research related to statistical correlations with indexes and higher scaling precipitation events over eastern N/A) recovery ordeal.  That is a total 1 standard deviation rise over a short span of time, with a mass-field that is HUGE - sufficiently large in both respects, a major player is an entirely acceptable assumption.  Adding in the west <-- fading black through central Canada, supplies a wave spacing negative geopotential anomaly argument right near WV give or take... so this all just timing perfectly, that a west eject trough would pass through that constructive interference region over eastern mid latitudes.

That's what these telecons illustrate, without the actual advent showing up ( very well ...I'm not sure what the immediate recent runs look like - but given the din in here, the UKMET and may be ? ) ... just yet.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Hugely agree there ( bold)...As I was just expressing to OceanStWx  ( Eric? I think it is -), I feel the primary sensitivity more relates to that handling. there is a change in the larger scaled wave exertion arriving from the d(PNA).  

when have the models ever been extraordinarily clever when it comes to handling a mode shift. 

image.png.238e38619fcb0f97319197056dab83ad.png  ....this is yesterday(left) vs last night's(right) PNA ...it is showing both d(PNA) and +d(trend)

This event really is an Archembault, ( after that research related to statistical correlations with indexes and higher scaling precipitation events over eastern N/A) recovery ordeal.  That is a total 1 standard deviation rise over a short span of time, with a mass-field that is HUGE - sufficiently large in both respects, a major player is an entirely acceptable assumption.  Adding in the west <-- fading black through central Canada, supplies a wave spacing negative geopotential anomaly argument right near WV give or take... so this all just timing perfectly, that a west eject trough would pass through that constructive interference region over eastern mid latitudes.

That's what these telecons illustrate, without the actual advent showing up ( very well ...I'm not sure what the immediate recent runs look like - but given the din in here, the UKMET and may be ? ) ... just yet.  

the UKMET did, as a matter of fact. full +PNA during the evolution

1850913455_500hv.conus(1).thumb.png.49f6173e8b82f631dcc6754c8f204906.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

the UKMET did, as a matter of fact. full +PNA during the evolution

1850913455_500hv.conus(1).thumb.png.49f6173e8b82f631dcc6754c8f204906.png

Bingo!

I think the Euro in honesty deserves an honorable mention there.  But this particular run/model may be the first to 'realize' the wave spacing arguments.

Where and what precisely come of it ... yadda yadda yadda.   

I'll tell ya... this +PNA appears ( tentatively) to be relaying into a much better actual +PNAP ... unlike that Dec cosmic dildo paradigm variant ...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Even George is approaching this with a level head...props there.

mmm  ... Okay, tell ya what ... I'll give credit for the virtue of encouragement/positive re-enforcement along the collective psycho-tactic reformation ( LOL... haha) effort .. .but he still used the word Blizzard.   I'm not sure there wasn't a kind of bargaining effort there that cons us into reading it

  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's been explained before but indulge me here... what's the difference between the Op run and the ensemble mean, is the op just a member that has more weight, or is the mean of them all factored into the op? that aside, this has a great look this far out, and has for days now, doesn't hurt to mention some of our biggest and best systems have come during the Ides of march, just before equinox seems to be a good time for major storm development. let's hope we hold serve and enjoy tracking something

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

GEFS look too suppressed for my liking.

I think I’d rather have it suppressed at this range than running through Long Island Sound because I don’t think this will tick SE the next few days. I want a little space for northward adjustments.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Heisy said:


That’s only through 144, wxfella has the maps beyond that. The low was still going through bombogenesis at the end of the free maps


.

Not to sound like a douche, but the impression of 500 mb height and vorticity loop ... where it ends on 144 doesn't require the actual sfc evolution by the trained Met/enthusiasts that know how the lower levels are forced by these mid level-type shenanigans.

That's a chart topper look ...  The 500 mb center, with its -2 or even -3 ST core, ends up in the Bite/abeam of NJ on the next frame ( most likely) and it's easy to envision a very, very deep surface consequence sitting right in the climate cross-hair for PHL-PWM.  It can't really do anything else, if the 96-144 movie is correct   Said deep low would probably capture and do a zig zag or backward yaw/hesitation or even loop somewhere off between the Jersey shore and ACK.  

So I guess of more pragmatic importance ... let's will those antecedent intervals correct - haha.   

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should go in to the 12z euro watch party knowing that most likely, the verbatim output will not be as sexy as 0z. We should focus on ensembles this far out, and not live and die by vicissitudes. 

Signed,

Someone who can lose serious sleep over storms modeled a week in advance (see March 2017)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Henry&#x27;s Weather said:

We should go in to the 12z euro watch party knowing that most likely, the verbatim output will not be as sexy as 0z. We should focus on ensembles this far out, and not live and die by vicissitudes. 

Signed,

Someone who can lose serious sleep over storms modeled a week in advance (see March 2017)

Just know; (and I know you do) that the OP runs are gonna vassal-ate all over, and should be taken with a Grain of salt.  Ensembles at this point, as has been said, is the best course of action. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...