Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Central PA - Winter 2021/2022


Bubbler86
 Share

Recommended Posts

February was the first full month for my weather station so here were the basics for the month. The 30.2ºF mean looked pretty close to average compared to the local climo (KAOO) despite a handful of days that did spike up into the 50s and a couple 60+ days. 

904663146_AmbientWeather2.thumb.png.0c7d6f72a9764cf7743961f839ceafaf.png

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bubbler86 said:

Disappointed in no "Boom's" or "Did you see this" for the St Patty's day snow storm?

image.thumb.png.bccdaf53e8c45390722c1e08e56cfbdf.png

 

You beat me by 5 minutes.

I have several maps to post from the 18z GFS!

Lol…This map would be funny if it verified because the Met at MU could claim a snowless victory while the rest of us are shoveling snow!

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, paweather said:

the 06z and 18z don’t use fresh observations.

If that were completely true, then why would the output/outcome change from 12Z to 18Z?   Here is a paper that better explains the findings:

https://ams.confex.com/ams/27WAF23NWP/webprogram/Handout/Paper273676/GFS4cycle_2015_NWP_Chicago_15A.pdf

 

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bubbler86 said:

If that were completely true, then why would the output/outcome change from 12Z to 18Z?   Here is a paper that better explains the findings:

https://ams.confex.com/ams/27WAF23NWP/webprogram/Handout/Paper273676/GFS4cycle_2015_NWP_Chicago_15A.pdf

 

 

Only skimmed, but the takeaway is that even if the 6z/18z is worse overall than 0z/12z, it’s actually as good or better through about D6-7?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bubbler86 said:

If that were completely true, then why would the output/outcome change from 12Z to 18Z?   Here is a paper that better explains the findings:

https://ams.confex.com/ams/27WAF23NWP/webprogram/Handout/Paper273676/GFS4cycle_2015_NWP_Chicago_15A.pdf

 

 

Yeah not sure I just pulled it from the internet but something is different about the off runs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...