Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

April 15-16 interior snow threat


ORH_wxman
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, STILL N OF PIKE said:

I won't be going to S Vt on this one.  Not buying the big totals by 495 in Mass but also was only traveling out there for the 20" potential that looked great.  Seems that may be knocked down a bit (still a very good storm out there ) but no quite worth my travel

Jackpot might be Monads or N ORH county above 1000 feet. You can prob find a parking spot at 1300-1500 feet in New Ipswich and get smoked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, STILL N OF PIKE said:

I won't be going to S Vt on this one.  Not buying the big totals by 495 in Mass but also was only traveling out there for the 20" potential that looked great.  Seems that may be knocked down a bit (still a very good storm out there ) but no quite worth my travel

Head to NE CT

  • Haha 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

You really are starting to wonder if this isn’t evolving into a lesser version of 97. You at least consider it 

The way its trending it may not be a lesser version (probably will though, but that’s more of 97 being a beast than anything).

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, STILL N OF PIKE said:

I won't be going to S Vt on this one.  Not buying the big totals by 495 in Mass but also was only traveling out there for the 20" potential that looked great.  Seems that may be knocked down a bit (still a very good storm out there ) but no quite worth my travel

Quitter.

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

The 00z euro clown gave me 7" on Pivotal...that is only 6", which suprised me. Need one more tic.

It looked like coldest temps near and to 925 were west of 128. Looked a little tied to forcing and slightly less maritime influence. 25 miles east and all bets are off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

4 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Yea, my point is I think that map under sells.

I would just add that folks are gonna want several hundred feet elevation to get more than advisory amounts unless this trends even deeper. I would favor 495 area and tad beyond (in a relative sense) because of that elevation. Maybe i'm wrong

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...