Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,604
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    eloveday
    Newest Member
    eloveday
    Joined

The Blizzard of the Ides, 2017 ...observation time


Typhoon Tip

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Some thoughts as dry slot is almost here:

1) Was there a single model that had a good handle of this storm?

Euro: too cold in eastern SNE, was still showing 1 foot snow in Boston 0z last night 7 hours before start. Way too high on qpf in most of SNE.

RGEM: had rain all the way to Worcester

GFS: no

Maybe the Op NAM? Para-NAM seemed too cold.

 

2) Why were basically 100% of models way too high on qpf in most of SNE? I mean Euro was showing > 2" Philly-NYC-all of SNE last night. That was part of why forecasts busted way too high as we expected much better rates pre-changeover.

 

3) Boston basically had ~2-2.5 hours of heavy snow with decent snowgrowth beginning 11:30. NWS / TV and otherwise forecasts busted too high across the board, but it was close. The poor snow growth since 2pm and eventual changeover robbed us an additional 3-4 inches between 2-4pm.

 

4) Regarding the poor snowgrowth around 2-4pm... I expected much better from soundings... seems like good DGZ omega and saturation, plenty cold column. Here was 1hour RAP for 18z KBOS:

rap_2017031417_001_KBOS.thumb.png.1e88e9cef5e4d6dd641a7e44d8598c61.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CTValleySnowMan said:

This is why many would still prefer the benchmark storm or just inside for a  track here in SNE.  These huggers tend to thump and slot after the WCB rips through if you are too close to the center. Should have been more leary of model qpf output. Maybe convective feedback? Deform action looks beautiful in Upstate/ CNY. I would take huge dendrites ripping with a light wind in deform heaven over this type of scenario today. I never usually materialize huge wind gusts or lose power here in the valley anyways. 

I recall several days back posting opines about the long wave, wave spacing issue modeled during this entire synoptic evolution, from the eastern Pacific across the breadth of N/A ... specifically that the ridge in the west was a bit too far west for ideology.

It's early for the fairest retrospect ... but, come tomorrow, I suspect my opinion won't have changed; what this system had going for it was a reasonably favorable lead side cold air mass... partially locked in place by some +PP up N (but not a lot either).  That helped feed back on preventing a surface track more west due to BL resistance... Probably that, and having the mid and upper morphology being as far E as it was (still less than ideal..) allowed for a snowier impact during this system's evolution.  

Still a lot of fun though -  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, backedgeapproaching said:

Looks like some 26-27" reports coming in West of ALB  in Delaware and Otsego Counties and they are still getting hit hard, so probably some isolated over 30" spots out there.

I had that band about 50mi to far to the east in NYS...damn.

I always expected this s streamer to trend west, until the end, but it went a bit further than I thought. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice storm in Merrimack Valley :)  still snowing pretty hard and we have over a foot of snow in Chelmsford.  Waiting for it to stop before we start snow blowing.  We won't reach the 18 inches they predicted, but it's still our biggest storm of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

I recall several days back posting opines about the long wave, wave spacing issue modeled during this entire synoptic evolution, from the eastern Pacific across the breadth of N/A ... specifically that the ridge in the west was a bit too far west for ideology.

It's early for the fairest retrospect ... but, come tomorrow, I suspect my opinion won't have changed; what this system had going for it was a reasonably favorable lead side cold air mass... partially locked in place by some +PP up N (but not a lot either).  That helped feed back on preventing a surface track more west due to BL resistance... Probably that, and having the mid and upper morphology being as far E as it was (still less than ideal..) allowed for a snowier impact during this system's evolution.  

Still a lot of fun though -  

 

 

Actually was thinking about this last night... we were already around 30F in Boston last evening. Another sign that we were toast. Any "buffer" we would have had from that cold air mass 24 hours prior was squandered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, wxsniss said:

Some thoughts as dry slot is almost here:

1) Was there a single model that had a good handle of this storm?

Euro: too cold in eastern SNE, was still showing 1 foot snow in Boston 0z last night 7 hours before start. Way too high on qpf in most of SNE.

RGEM: had rain all the way to Worcester

GFS: no

Maybe the Op NAM? Para-NAM seemed too cold.

 

2) Why were basically 100% of models way too high on qpf in most of SNE? I mean Euro was showing > 2" Philly-NYC-all of SNE last night. That was part of why forecasts busted way too high as we expected a much better rates pre-changeover.

 

3) Boston basically had ~2-2.5 hours of heavy snow with decent snowgrowth beginning 11:30. NWS / TV and otherwise forecasts busted too high across the board, but it was close. The poor snow growth since 2pm and eventual changeover robbed us an additional 3-4 inches between 2-4pm.

 

4) Regarding the poor snowgrowth around 2-4pm... I expected much better from soundings... seems like good DGZ omega and saturation, plenty cold column. Here was 1hour RAP for 18z KBOS:

 

Re #1 ...it depends on what aspect:  The models handled the advent of a system remarkably well...picking up on a storm way in advance and despite some arguable more or less impacting model cycle depictions, they persisted.  

If we want to get into details and particulars... like timing rain vs snow and amounts --- Oy yoi yoi.. Perhaps some of that ambiguity could have been cleared up by a pure phase.. We got into trouble with this guy because he wasn't really shaking hands between steams too well, and that sort of tilted the system and made for warm layers and dry-slots and other migraines.  

Re #2 ...probably should let the system truly wind down before assessing but ... yeah, it appears 1 to 1.5" should do it; perhaps half ?  I'm less than certain about the exact numbers and that's also yet to be determined.. It may be the source region for the southern component having a hefty PWAT source.  QPF is not a very good metric in atmospheric modeling though anyway?  It's actually not uncommon for x-y-z locations to bust high or low regardless of predictability of event. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, wxsniss said:

Some thoughts as dry slot is almost here:

1) Was there a single model that had a good handle of this storm?

Euro: too cold in eastern SNE, was still showing 1 foot snow in Boston 0z last night 7 hours before start. Way too high on qpf in most of SNE.

RGEM: had rain all the way to Worcester

GFS: no

Maybe the Op NAM? Para-NAM seemed too cold.

 

2) Why were basically 100% of models way too high on qpf in most of SNE? I mean Euro was showing > 2" Philly-NYC-all of SNE last night. That was part of why forecasts busted way too high as we expected much better rates pre-changeover.

 

3) Boston basically had ~2-2.5 hours of heavy snow with decent snowgrowth beginning 11:30. NWS / TV and otherwise forecasts busted too high across the board, but it was close. The poor snow growth since 2pm and eventual changeover robbed us an additional 3-4 inches between 2-4pm.

 

4) Regarding the poor snowgrowth around 2-4pm... I expected much better from soundings... seems like good DGZ omega and saturation, plenty cold column. Here was 1hour RAP for 18z KBOS:

rap_2017031417_001_KBOS.thumb.png.1e88e9cef5e4d6dd641a7e44d8598c61.png

These systems that are one massive front end dump typically short change you despite having 4-6 hrs of insane conditions. It comes to the wet bias models have from very strong low level warm air advection in combination with less lift, warmer and drier air in the DGZ. That's why many were doubting those high numbers that Noyes and others had. Just remember to always take the under on exorbitant amounts with these setups. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wxsniss said:

 

Actually was thinking about this last night... we were already around 30F in Boston last evening. Another sign that we were toast. Any "buffer" we would have had from that cold air mass 24 hours prior was squandered.

:D

squandered?  - or "Marched" ... maybe it's to be expected having two full days of sun a mere week before the Equinox ... Cold air or not... that's going to modulate some -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

QPF is often often over modeled east of the H7 low, but I though that the low level convergence would have been of a bit more benefit.

This storm was very similar to Boxing day, minus the 18" band near Boston.

I'm not sure why the coastal from was essentially non-existant in this event. 

March, and also storm started to draw in lower level warmth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...