Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,532
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    e46ds1x
    Newest Member
    e46ds1x
    Joined

Revenge of the Weekend Warrior Storm: 2/15-2/16


PhineasC

Recommended Posts

Guys, check the description on those products:

http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/pwpf/about_pwpf_products.shtml

They aren't the final probabilities; they are a 28 member "auto ensemble" that includes all 21 sref members, 7 of the latest operational runs (in this case the ECMWF is the prior run), along with the HPC WWD's deterministic snowfall forecast that is sent internally to the WFOs for guidance. The reason why HPC doesn't go public with their deterministic snow/ice accum graphics is because the WFOs (and thus NDFD) have final say on accums and we don't want to add confusion or conflict within NWS products. So, the WFOs (and RFCs) can see that deterministic output from HPC via an internal webpage, usually by 0630 and 1830Z so they can have enough time to use those grids as guidance if they choose to.

The deterministic accumulations (which is prism or elevation adjusted) serve as a baseline guidance for the field offices, while also serving as a member along with the 28 member autoensemble probabilistic forecast. Ah, but it is an important lone member in that it serves as the "mode" for those probabilistic calculations that you see linked from the HPC website. The forecaster-adjusted "final" probabilities are manually edited for the 4, 8, 12 inch 10, 40, 70 percent probabilities. They come out between 8-9 and 20-21Z.

One other thing about those autoensemble probabilities: 21 of 28 members are the SREF components, i.e. 7 WRF members, 7 NMM members, and 7 NMMB members. In other words: very SREF heavy. So, if the SREF is out to lunch...guess what...so will the autoensemble. These adjustments should show up in the HPC final 4/8/12" probabilities, though we don't edit the 1, 2, or 6" inch probs.

Thanks - this is very informative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

From Mt Holly at 8:51pm:

 

THE BIG PLAYER IN THE LONGTERM PERIOD IS THE POSSIBLE WINTER STORMSTARTING FRIDAY NIGHT THROUGH A BETTER PART OF THE DAY ON SATURDAY.MID-LEVEL TROUGHING, DEPENDING ON HOW DEEP IT BECOMES, WILL DICTATEHOW FAR OR CLOSE TO THE COAST THE SURFACE WAVE MOVES. SURFACECYCLOGENESIS IS VERY LIKELY TO OCCUR JUST AHEAD OF THE COLD FRONTALPASSAGE FRIDAY EVENING AND MOVES OFF TOWARDS THE NORTHEAST. DID NOTBUY INTO A WHOLE-SALE CHANGE WITH OUR SNOWFALL TOTALS AND USED AMORE CONSERVATIVE APPROACH. LOOKS LIKE A SOLID 2-4 FROM PHILADELPHIASOUTH AND EAST WHICH WOULD PUT THEM CLOSE TO HEADLINECRITERIA...JUST DID NOT HAVE THE CONFIDENCE BASED ON ONE MODEL RUN.
It's looking better.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really do have to admire the way every possible snow threat gets ripped away from our area. It has it's own kind of awesomeness.

It was never a snow threat. It was a model threat that the models picked up on 5 minutes ago and people ran away with. Vinyl even came out of retirement to talk about a Hecs. This is going to be the deepest sharpest trough anyone has ever seen in history.

Maybe we'll get the usual. Rain, cartopper. 1-2" for Ji.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was never a snow threat. It was a model threat that the models picked up on 5 minutes ago and people ran away with. Vinyl even came out of retirement to talk about a Hecs. This is going to be the deepest sharpest trough anyone has ever seen in history.

Maybe we'll get the usual. Rain, cartopper. 1-2" for Ji.

Well, models are emotionless, so when models put out systems whether they be snow or rain, there's something there that's causing them to do that. Weenies dont cause a model to show snow solutions. For whatever reason, they have a knack of showing us a picture that we want to see, and then retracting it. And this isn't just happening in one or two models, it's across the board.

The "cold" light snow we had around the 25th of Jan is a great example. That looked great on everything, especially the beloved Euro, only to wilt and die as we got closer. It seems lately, every event, if you can call them that, goes through the exact same progression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was never a snow threat. It was a model threat that the models picked up on 5 minutes ago and people ran away with. Vinyl even came out of retirement to talk about a Hecs. This is going to be the deepest sharpest trough anyone has ever seen in history.

Maybe we'll get the usual. Rain, cartopper. 1-2" for Ji.

It is true the "threat" suddenly showed up today.  Or, more appropriately, "re-appeared" today.  However, the models did indicate a good storm signal around the 18th.  There were some weird solutions, yes, but overall it looked like a real possibility in many ways, and I know a lot of the more knowledgeable mets on here were saying the same thing about the overall pattern.  Then it more or less evaporated, a sharp trough with the energy farther north (or something like that), which took the thermal gradient too far east.  And since then, that's been the predominant solution.  Seems that kind of thing has happened every time this year, a good signal and good overall pattern shows up, but nothing pans out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...