Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    19,051
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    Damisa
    Newest Member
    Damisa
    Joined

Late May/June 2026 Medium/Long Range


 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, SolidIcewx said:

Triple digits next week?

Widespread triple digits are rare in these parts. Generally we need:

  • Full sun
  • 850 temps at or above +25°, and 925 temps at or above +27°
  • The previous nighttime low to be at least 80°
  • Have locations be at least 90° - 93° by 11:00 am the day of
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Eskimo Joe said:

Widespread triple digits are rare in these parts. Generally we need:

  • Full sun
  • 850 temps at or above +25°, and 925 temps at or above +27°
  • The previous nighttime low to be at least 80°
  • Have locations be at least 90° - 93° by 11:00 am the day of

What do you think the chances are this coming week? Seeing a couple models hint at it and then point and click has been consistent since earlier on Wednesday. At least for Alexandria and into PG where i work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SolidIcewx said:

What do you think the chances are this coming week? Seeing a couple models hint at it and then point and click has been consistent since earlier on Wednesday. At least for Alexandria and into PG where i work.

From what I can see now, if we're going to make a run at scattered or event widespread 100s, Thursday is the best day to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, AnEndlessMaze said:

Let’s go for hottest day ever recorded- I can’t think of a more ironic way to kick off this nation’s 250th anniversary. :lol:

I hope they set the record on so called “climate change” straight at the Great American Fair with an exhibit on the REAL science of underwater volcanoes!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The AFD mentioned that the all-time warmest low for Annapolis was 92, on 7/7/94. That is what was in the official records, but the observation has to be some sort of glitch. Patuxent River had a low of 74 on that date.

That 92 should never have made it into the AFD; it's so clearly bogus it doesn't pass the smell test!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, kgottwald said:

The AFD mentioned that the all-time warmest low for Annapolis was 92, on 7/7/94. That is what was in the official records, but the observation has to be some sort of glitch. Patuxent River had a low of 74 on that date.

That 92 should never have made it into the AFD; it's so clearly bogus it doesn't pass the smell test!

Like the "29 inches of snow that fell at BWI in 2016. Bogus. I measured 21" at BWI. The biggest official snowstorm is Bogus. Feb 2010 was the GOAT. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, dailylurker said:

Like the "29 inches of snow that fell at BWI in 2016. Bogus. I measured 21" at BWI. The biggest official snowstorm is Bogus. Feb 2010 was the GOAT. 

Not only that, but 2/5-6/2010 was probably undercounted too. That was when LWX realized the FAA contractors weren’t measuring every 6 hours at BWI and had to derive an estimate using the 24-hour measurement.

  • clap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welp...sounds like a snowless torch and at least 1 nina the year after to me. Not sure that'll make any of us happy. And before anybody weenies me...refute why that setup is any good for snow. The super niño is locked in at this point, so that, at least, it IS happening. Only question appears to be how East-based...and this poster seems to believe that's the most likely. East based=torch, right?

30 minutes ago, csnavywx said:

The entire warm pool is being discharged.

Not only is there not any significant trade resistance this time around (remember '15?), quite a bit of activity has been ongoing away from the equator in addition to being on it. Modeling has steadily been playing catchup since the start of the event as it gradually incorporates all of the additional accumulated wind stress and eckman transport. 

This will be a colossal east-based event and trying to short it or fade it or talk it down is a fool's game. Look I get it, I like snow too and very early on (Dec/Jan) I was hoping we'd get a moderate event with the indo-pacific warm pool still intact. But that ain't happening. Better off cheering for some exotically warm winter up north that forces some weirdly favorable wave breaks downstream and south. Or save your emotional capital for the backlash Nina period. These big Ninos do have a tendency to cause climate regime shifts, so it's not always a bad thing once the event clears.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

Welp...sounds like a snowless torch and at least 1 nina the year after to me. Not sure that'll make any of us happy. And before anybody weenies me...refute why that setup is any good for snow. The super niño is locked in at this point, so that, at least, it IS happening. Only question appears to be how East-based...and this poster seems to believe that's the most likely. East based=torch, right?

 

I'd be happy if we could get even a single impactful rain storm out if it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • WxUSAF unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...