Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    19,007
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    loganboehmewx
    Newest Member
    loganboehmewx
    Joined

The Allsnow Blizzard of 2026


Rjay
 Share

Recommended Posts

  20 Largest Snowstorms
  Central Park in NYC
Rank Amount Year & Date(s)
1 27.5 January 23, 2016
2 26.9 February 11-12, 2006
3 25.8 December 26-27, 1947
4 21.0 March 12-14, 1888
5 20.9 February 25-26, 2010
6 20.2 January 7-8, 1996
7 20.0 December 26-27, 2010
8 19.8 February 16-17, 2003
9 19.0 January 26-27, 2011
10 18.1 March 7-8, 1941
11 18.1 January 22-24, 1935
12 18.0 December 26, 1872
13 17.7 February 5-7, 1978
14 17.6 February 11-12, 1983
15 17.5 February 4-7, 1920
16 17.4 February 3-4, 1961
17 17.4 Jan 31-Feb1 2021
18 16.0 December 19-20, 1948
19 16.0 February 12-13, 1899
20 15.3 February 9-10, 1969
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SACRUS said:


2/22 12z NAM
 

qpf_acc-imp.us_ma.png

 

sn10_acc-imp.us_ma.png

You can see the western edge moving east on many of the models. Not as expansive of a precip field on the recent Mesos. I’m riding the razors edge here between a significant storm and something more run of the mill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BoulderWX said:

You can see the western edge moving east on many of the models. Not as expansive of a precip field on the recent Mesos. I’m riding the razors edge here between a significant storm and something more run of the mill

 

It'll be all about the banding

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BoulderWX said:

You can see the western edge moving east on many of the models. Not as expansive of a precip field on the recent Mesos. I’m riding the razors edge here between a significant storm and something more run of the mill

These almost always edge back east at the end and the NAM’s the NAM. Otherwise we just watch to see where the best banding sets up.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TKFJ said:

Upton should not have bit on the crazy numbers being printed out by the NAM/GFS. The 12-18” forecast for the NE NJ counties should have stuck. 18-22” is too high

Mt Holly jumped from 8-16, 16-20, now 18-25. That was bold lol. But they’re the pros. We’ll see but right now not even the most aggressive models show that for my area. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

These almost always edge back east at the end and the NAM’s the NAM. Otherwise we just watch to see where the best banding sets up.

Also, those maps are 10:1. Someone will get in a monster band that drops 4” an hour with 14:1 ratios. Could be in NJ or Long Island 

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...