Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,631
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    BroadWing3544
    Newest Member
    BroadWing3544
    Joined

The Allsnow Blizzard of 2026


Rjay
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, cleetussnow said:

Appreciate that.  Rare beasts.  2001 was sort of, but not in the classical sense.  Very rare and lets see the verification.  Players on the field.

You don’t need a triple phaser to get low 960’s though.  Boxing Day and Jan 2018 did it with no triple phase.  Feb 1978 was probably the best wind snow storm in the last 100 years and it was only around 980 with a 1040 high nearby giving it a huge gradient.  1996 also had an impressive high nearby and a tight gradient.  With this one looks like a 1050 high but it’s further afield in central Canada.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ForestHillWx said:

Can start to see the semblance of a weenie band setting up from West Point southwest to West Milford down to my area near Long Valley.

For us northern folks, that outer max band always brings the goods; hope I end up under it. 

Last night I thought I would be happy with 12”.  Now I want 18” or bust.

  • Like 2
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Blizzardo said:

96 southern stream came out of the gulf and I thought it pulled in the western and northern streams if I am using the right terms... Could be wrong but regardless.... this is an equal powerhouse...

I’m no expert!  Thought it was overrunning than transfer with a normal phase.  Storm never got sub 980 but had very solid winds due to the close in arctic high creating a tight gradient.

If this tucks in winds should be higher than 1996 but doubt we get as high or sustained as 1978.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, deathstar9 said:

You don’t need a triple phaser to get low 960’s though.  Boxing Day and Jan 2018 did it with no triple phase.  Feb 1978 was probably the best wind snow storm in the last 100 years and it was only around 980 with a 1040 high nearby giving it a huge gradient.  1996 also had an impressive high nearby and a tight gradient.  With this one looks like a 1050 high but it’s further afield in central Canada.

Totally agree.  Its a nice to have, not a need to have.  For this one, it could be the stick of dynamite that gets us to 960s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you thinking?

Guessing a foot here? Obviously a lot of upside potential; seen a lot of storms like this over the years that creep north and west (great name, btw) and blow up over us, like 2016 and 2021. I’ll stay conservative and say a foot for now.


.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, cleetussnow said:

Phase, but a little later than the nam.  Timing of capture matters for western interests.  Resolution isn’t going to lock the timing within 6 hrs so its just a wobble.  967 bomb

That's where the mesos come in. Globals can miss these slight variations 

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...