Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,647
    Total Members
    25,819
    Most Online
    Donut Hole
    Newest Member
    Donut Hole
    Joined

Is we back? February discussion thread


mahk_webstah
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, CoastalWx said:

Everyone is dropping their pants to this winter, but if you take the snow goggles off, it’s surprising we only had one good storm and that took a gulf low ramming into an arctic dome. Think about that for a second. 

Exactly how many 12 inch plus storms do you think we have on an annual basis 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

Exactly how many 12 inch plus storms do you think we have on an annual basis 

The average of those are based on good patterns and bad patterns. We had a pretty good pattern, but we couldn’t buy a coastal which to me would be surprising if you told me that five months ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

The average of those are based on good patterns and bad patterns. We had a pretty good pattern, but we couldn’t buy a coastal which to me would be surprising if you told me that five months ago.

 

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I'm really not surprised given the MJO....SWFE death I am.

Patience grasshoppers 

  • Haha 1
  • Crap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I'm really not surprised given the MJO....SWFE death I am.

I’d still think this longwave look should’ve produced at least one or two solid coastals. Only fly in the ointment is you can see the western ridge getting sliced off a bit in Canada, we know at least a couple systems failed on us because we couldn’t quite amplify it enough out west. But even with that showing up minorly in the mean, it’s still surprising we didn’t pop at least a miller B or two.  
 

image.gif.94ce84a464d4ec74a0fda5ba963dc7e9.gif

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

I’d still think this longwave look should’ve produced at least one or two solid coastals. Only fly in the ointment is you can see the western ridge getting sliced off a bit in Canada, we know at least a couple systems failed on us because we couldn’t quite amplify it enough out west. But even with that showing up minorly in the mean, it’s still surprising we didn’t pop at least a miller B or two.  
 

image.gif.94ce84a464d4ec74a0fda5ba963dc7e9.gif

See that’s telling right there. Because you’re right and it kind of validates my thinking too about coastals,  but we’ve also commented on that stupid trough backing its ass up south of Alaska screwing things up too. That’s definitely porked us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CoastalWx said:

See that’s telling right there. Because you’re right and it kind of validates my thinking too about coastals,  but we’ve also commented on that stupid trough backing its ass up south of Alaska screwing things up too. That’s definitely porked us.

Potential no?

ecmwf_z500_vort_neus_49.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NoCORH4L said:

@Damage In Tollanddo you think with this continued stein, it could set us up with a nice spring inferno potential? Those super dry, sunny, and windy April days can be dangerous. 

I don’t think it’s been Stein. It’s snowed a lot in the last 50 days . There’s probably 2” of liquid in the pack with more coming tonight . 
 

Im worried about a nasty cold late spring because of the frozen Great Lakes and frigid SST’s

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's almost like the GFS is dropping the W into a -EPO tendency in the first week, and then walking away

Meanwhile, the index interpretation is offers uncertainy.  That N. Pac thing from late Novie through Dec is back in its haunt,

image.png.db5962f4d354613c809aab211067d06e.png

but it's not clear whether it will mean same or similar or somehow idiosyncratically different over the eastern N/A continent.   This looks like a cold stormy pattern at a glance but that ridge up there is sort of in the hybrid WPO/EPO space which complicates matters, particularly if it is resonant and not moving.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...