MJO812 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 13 minutes ago, eduggs said: This is probably one of those cases where probability of exceedance does a better job than QPF mean at characterizing the likelihood of impact. A few high QPF members are likely skewing the mean. Alot of decent hits Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago GEFS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnoSki14 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago There's a follow up system that has a better chance to do something a few days later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowlover11 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago We’re cooked chat. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LovintheWhiteFluff Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU848789 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Interesting to see Lee Goldberg's first "guess" (he said it was a model run he agreed with, but his first forecast will be out tomorrow), which I think is reasonable and WxRisk's first guess which seems very aggressive and based heavily on the 18Z Euro. I'm also still stunned by the NBM being so high - and it has been cut down significantly since 18Z (maybe from the ensembles being still snowier than their Ops). With the 0Z Op models all showing very little snow in our region, except for far E LI (and except for the stubborn Euro still showing an inch for the NJ coast and a few inches for E LI), I wonder if we'll finally see the NBM really come down and DT cut back on his totals (and maybe even Lee). Same thing with the probabilities for 4" from the storm in the NWS graphic below, which seem very hight. Sucks to see so much potential likely being unrealized, but I did just get 19" worth of "snow" (as frozen snow/sleet mass), so it's hard to complain too much. On the other hand, we're still 3.5 days out, and it wouldn't take a monumental shift to at least bring a few inches to 95, so you never know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEG NAO Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 22 minutes ago, RU848789 said: Interesting to see Lee Goldberg's first "guess" (he said it was a model run he agreed with, but his first forecast will be out tomorrow), which I think is reasonable and WxRisk's first guess which seems very aggressive and based heavily on the 18Z Euro. I'm also still stunned by the NBM being so high - and it has been cut down significantly since 18Z (maybe from the ensembles being still snowier than their Ops). With the 0Z Op models all showing very little snow in our region, except for far E LI (and except for the stubborn Euro still showing an inch for the NJ coast and a few inches for E LI), I wonder if we'll finally see the NBM really come down and DT cut back on his totals (and maybe even Lee). Sucks to see so much potential likely being unrealized, but I did just get 19" worth of "snow" (as frozen snow/sleet mass), so it's hard to complain too much. On the other hand, we're still 3.5 days out, and it wouldn't take a monumental shift to at least bring a few inches to 95, so you never know. I think its amazing how some posters here are just "throwing in the towel" on this storm like there is no chance of any snow when parts of the region could still receive anywhere from 2 - 8 inches AS OF NOW or more if there is a slight northwest jog of less than 100 miles. if you receive 4 -8 inches it will seem like a bigger deal because of all the snow already on the ground and frozen solid piles and VERY cold temps. The only good thing is it would be overnight Saturday once again very little traffic and Sunday a majority of people don't have to go to work or school. I also think the title of this thread is misleading - FYI it could be coming but only a smaller event than previously expected. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bxstormwatcher360 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Only model with a hit is the 0z navgem so far. This model did pretty damn well in the last storm we had. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadowsintherain Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago It doesn’t need much of a jog west. . 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bxstormwatcher360 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 0z canadian def trended west. It gets us in to the light snow. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bxstormwatcher360 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 29 minutes ago, shadowsintherain said: It doesn’t need much of a jog west. . Yeah 2 models have trended west so far,we keep forgetting that a 30 to 60 mile swing northwest gets us in to the good snows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TriPol Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 7 hours ago, Freezing Drizzle said: NYCSNOW - During the winter of 1976 or 1977 there was an area-wide event dubbed the "One inch blizzard." It was exactly what they called it. You might be able to search for it. Huh. That's what my wife calls me. Now I get where she got it from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycsnow Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago There is not one model now that gives meaningful snow…. I think we can officially declare it dead 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Off hour runs suck. Never trust them. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 4 hours ago, Snowlover11 said: We’re cooked chat. Yes we are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now