Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,690
    Total Members
    11,691
    Most Online
    dorkchop
    Newest Member
    dorkchop
    Joined

Possible coastal storm centered on Feb 1 2026.


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

With all these lows(fake or real?), we may see a situation where modeling will decide to blow up/focus on one, and ride it up the coast, after all the other appendages/convection exits east…so it may be a situation where it’s delayed, but not ultimately denied. That is a possibility. 

Thats been my thinking.. if we get that out of the way or weaker it might work

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

Kind of what we’ve been mentioning. It’s a winter hurricane so it’s going to do that . Just depends how close it can pass 

I see that, but honestly I thought it was the opposite. Won’t a really wound up low with closed off centers be less expansive as it collapses onto itself?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

Kind of what we’ve been mentioning. It’s a winter hurricane so it’s going to do that . Just depends how close it can pass 

Are we sure this is still this powerhouse of a system? It seems with all these other lows and what not…it’s robbing the potential for whatever low does seem to become the primary storm so to speak?  This is a mess…I have a feeling this becomes something completely different than what we all were expecting. Whether that helps or hurts SNE, remains to be seen.
 

But most of us are out of the game anyway, as it looks now, so let’s morph this into something else, and take our chances? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kitz Craver said:

I see that, but honestly I thought it was the opposite. Won’t a really wound up low with closed off centers be less expansive as it collapses onto itself?

That’s why I’m so confused at these posts. Look at the gradient. Wherever it is. I don’t see anything other a massive precip field moving over the region.

It’s a pretty narrow area, for those that get into it. Some of these runs show like an inch for Boston and foot for the cape. That doesn’t scream broad circulation to me 

  • Like 1
  • Disagree 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, ineedsnow said:

The NAM would probably have a big band further west.. Kev FTW? 

I actually agree with this sentiment ...wrt to just this 12z run, sure -

The system's close 531 dm actually encases the whole region with some E component at that 500 mb initiated.  The QPF paint on the actual surface chart looks dubiously broken apart. 

This is a very large system.  It's possible in fact probable that the there'll be an extended quasi CCB arc out farther than the typical size one may be used to seeing.  I mean I'm not trying to gaslight anyone into thinking but this arc could be more formed than what we are seeing here - if having the visual example helps ...

 

 

  • Like 3
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said:

That’s why I’m so confused at these posts. Look at the gradient. Wherever it is. I don’t see anything other a massive precip field moving over the region.

It’s a pretty narrow area, for those that get into it. Some of these runs show like an inch for Boston and foot for the cape. That doesn’t scream broad circulation to me 

Well there is a high percentage of weenies opining in here(including myself)currently, so take with a grain of salt… lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

I actually agree with this sentiment ...wrt to just this 12z run, sure -

The system's close 531 dm actually encases the whole region with some E component at that 500 mb initiated.  The QPF paint on the actual surface chart looks dubiously broken apart. 

This is a very large system.  It's possible in fact probable that the there'll be an extended quasi CCB arc out farther than the typical size one may be used to seeing.  I mean I'm not trying to gaslight anyone into thinking but this arc could be more formed than what we are seeing here - if having the visual example helps ...

 

 

Yea I agree with this. More likely than not given the mid level proximity.

i also agree this is an “advisory level something” but disappointing given the potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jbenedet said:

The real problem is the trailing clippah which is dampening - “kicker”

 

I don’t see any other issues. That’s the problem.

Gonna have to disagree with you there, its mostly about that front-running stuff, IMO.

You can keep the kicker exactly the same, if you can better incorporate the stuff around/north of the Bahamas into the general circulation instead of allowing it to stretch the circulation and flatten heights ahead of it, you'd be dealing with a massive storm much closer to the Delmarva.

The way its modeled now, that front-running stuff is creating the weakness that the ULL escapes northeastward through

The runs that showed hits and or very-close misses all share the characteristic that they orient that energy more meridionally than zonally

  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We would of had a big snowstorm on our hands if H5 low would have been further north instead of near the Southern Mid Atlantic. They will be seeing a nice snowstorm with strong winds ( wouldnt be shocked to see blizzard warnings) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Squash city. That W-E ribbon of vorticity is basically a 500mb front…NE flow above it and W flow south of it.

The end of the PV lobe/trough/vortmax tries to dig, curl, and amplify but it just can’t recover enough to make the system significantly affect us at our lat/long. If we didn’t get that little extra shitstreak dropping south over Maine I think there would be a better ridging response over New England and that vort may dug off the Carolinas instead. 
It’s almost looks like that extra suppression forces the angular momentum to dig it further south. But maybe that’s just weenie physics to my naked eyes  

image.gif

  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...