Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,477
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    kmsrocknj
    Newest Member
    kmsrocknj
    Joined

First Legit Storm Potential of the Season Upon Us


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Winter Wizard said:

From what I've gathered, verification stats have had Euro AI ensemble and EPS as pretty much neck and neck...sometimes the AI has had a slight edge but definitely not the magic bullet that some people imply. The AI has done better with individual storms, especially this hurricane season, but it also got its clock cleaned in others. Just like with every other model. My two cents is there is promise, but the jury is still out on when they are most useful and to what extent. There will always be limitations when the models are mostly data-driven instead of physics based. 

I never imagined this forum diverge into a discussion about AI :lol:

Admittedly, your last sentence is difficult to accept. I'm sure most of us feel the same too.

To add to the discussion, here's the 12z ensemble spread and diagnostic prate/type at 90hr... Still uncertainty amongst the ensembles/models so we're not entirely dead yet.

If I had to stratify it as is (for measurable precipitation), I'd call it the AIs+ICON+CMC vs. GFS+ECMWF+UKMET.

sfcmslp-meanmem.conus.gif

ptype.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ORH_wxman said:

Reggie with a move west. Prob wrong but still plenty of model disagreement. 

Quite surprised how that looked....it was west with Saturday too, but would sacrifice Saturday for the look Sunday. The timing is odd too, snowing here on Sunday, early morning

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, eduggs said:

I don't agree with this at all. I think it leads many people off a cliff. People think their intuition regarding loosely defined concepts like "pattern" is superior to supercomputers developed specifically to model exactly what's possible in the atmosphere. It's pure ego. 

I, well I really don't get that at all. SO many times we've heard good Mets say why XYZ solution doesn't make sense... as in today's "storm". The good ones raised flags everywhere when certainmodelsstartedshowingbig hits, seen it a million times over the years... and then you have the social media twats. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said:

Lol I get severe whiplash reading through these pages. 

Still worth watching for a moderate event but obviously a big hit looks off the table. 

Still concerning EC wants nothing to do with it hopefully some kind of agreement at 00Z.

Yeah. I’m definitely it buying anything for my area, unless something drastic changes. further east could still get something.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i said this earlier..  

anyone remember nemo tracking..  how did the models react 3 days prior to getting hit?

this reminds me of Nemo but the opposite. euro was on the western front that time showing 36 inches for NYC, ended up with like 8 inches. also gfs ended up showing the most eastern solutions than lost it for a day than brought it back! Euro never wavered until  the storm was about to hit! this reminds me of that but the opposite meaning GfS should start showing western hits again by tonight the latest otherwise my theory is wrong. Also euro isn't as good since that last upgrade a few years back 

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said:

Let’s get the euro something better than a Cape scraper. At least get some advisory stuff to E MA coast and we’ll have something to work with at 3 days out. 

this reminds me of Nemo but the opposite. euro was on the western front that time showing 36 inches for NYC, ended up with like 8 inches. also gfs ended up showing the most eastern solutions than lost it for a day than brought it back! Euro never wavered until  the storm was about to hit! this reminds me of that but the opposite meaning GfS should start showing western hits again by tonight the latest otherwise my theory is wrong. Also euro isn't as good since that last upgrade a few years back and

  • Weenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WeatherGeek2025 said:

this reminds me of Nemo but the opposite. euro was on the western front that time showing 36 inches for NYC, ended up with like 8 inches. also gfs ended up showing the most eastern solutions than lost it for a day than brought it back! Euro never wavered until  the storm was about to hit! this reminds me of that but the opposite meaning GfS should start showing western hits again by tonight the latest otherwise my theory is wrong. Also euro isn't as good since that last upgrade a few years back and

Completely different setup. The pattern is more progressive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, weatherwiz said:

As stated the idea of they're supposed to "learn" is totally overblown. Traditional models already have some AI built into them and already do this to an extent. From what I understand (and this may not apply equally to AI models) is

AI assists with the initializing scheme whereas it combs through ingested data and will "remove" what it believes to be bad data or an outlier based on a slew of historical information. The goal here is, or the idea is, this will lead to a more accurate initialization which is important because once you move forward in time you start to introduce error and that error becomes compounded over time...that is why forecast models (OP) are generally useless beyond D7-10 and can even be relatively useless past D5 if there is alot going on. Error also occurs because of rounding and approximations, especially approximations. 

AI models are built on a wealth of historical data where it runs and looks for similarities, both to the initialized field and then forecasts based on how these similarities evolved in the past. 

The challenges in all of this is, there is still a lot we don't understand about weather, particularly when it comes down to processes which occur during storm evolution and it becomes even more of a challenge because for forecast models to ingest this data we have to be able to parameterize it. 

There is much more to this then just verifying a specific level or variable and even that leads to a lot of questions. Probably in a tame weather pattern that is not hostile, AI will outperform but what good is that or what value is that really adding? 

Good points.  I do think AI currently has solid value beyond just "tame patterns".   In any case, just wait until we have a blend of AI,  physical inputs, and quantum computing.  In a way, I hope modelling doesn't get too good, it will take the fun out this.  Like watching the UConn women play Xavier or some team like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WeatherGeek2025 said:

this reminds me of Nemo but the opposite. euro was on the western front that time showing 36 inches for NYC, ended up with like 8 inches. also gfs ended up showing the most eastern solutions than lost it for a day than brought it back! Euro never wavered until  the storm was about to hit! this reminds me of that but the opposite meaning GfS should start showing western hits again by tonight the latest otherwise my theory is wrong. Also euro isn't as good since that last upgrade a few years back and

Cocked?

  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...