Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,460
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    kmsrocknj
    Newest Member
    kmsrocknj
    Joined

January 2026 Medium/Long Range Discussion


snowfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

that's because the 500mb wave is positively tilted on that one. Need a neutral or neg tilt. But at this range it won't take much

I think the problem is that a lot of the snow fans here have an all or nothing mentality when it comes to patterns. If it's not going to show a 1996,2003,2016 level storm then into the garbage it goes as if that's our only way to get snow.

  • Haha 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ji said:

yea too many people think if there is a circle in the middle atlantic it has to mean big storm

Nobody said that. The fact remains that we can't get anything to work without perfection, and there's no such thing as perfection in MA snowstorms outside of 1 every 12-15 years. I  contend the general NW-->SE flow is the reason for storms failing to develop vs prior years and weak qpf output.  If this doesn't change at some point, get used to ensemble progs the rest of the "cold enough to snow" season being right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mitchnick said:

Nobody said that. The fact remains that we can't get anything to work without perfection, and there's no such thing as perfection in MA snowstorms outside of 1 every 12-15 years. I  contend the general NW-->SE flow is the reason for storms failing to develop vs prior years and weak qpf output.  If this doesn't change at some point, get used to ensemble progs the rest of the "cold enough to snow" season being right. 

Perfection is required for Miller B domination..  When a low comes  up from Georgia and  moves northeast like an A then very little perfection is needed. We don’t get As for almost 10 years now 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Scraff said:

How is this not producing? I guess if it’s going to, it needs to start showing some digital blue love by the 7 day out mark. So we have time, but it’s ticking fast.
 

IMG_5819.jpeg

How? It's a passage of a cold front after a period of decently AN temps that are slow to leave. Very little precip falls per the run before and after that 216hrs panel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, mitchnick said:

How? It's a passage of a cold front after a period of decently AN temps that are slow to leave. Very little precip falls per the run before and after that 216hrs panel.

I didn’t dig deeper into it. It just looked like a good set up. Meh. Whatevs. It will snow again one day…I think. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mitchnick said:

Nobody said that. The fact remains that we can't get anything to work without perfection, and there's no such thing as perfection in MA snowstorms outside of 1 every 12-15 years. I  contend the general NW-->SE flow is the reason for storms failing to develop vs prior years and weak qpf output.  If this doesn't change at some point, get used to ensemble progs the rest of the "cold enough to snow" season being right. 

You are close.    Too much NW - SE flow is a dry flow and discourages the pattern that we need with an active STJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...