Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    masonj4
    Newest Member
    masonj4
    Joined

January 2026 regional war/obs/disco thread


Baroclinic Zone
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

Not going to lie but looking at the long range in all models I got a 2011 2015 boner. 

We’re getting a pseudo El Niño pattern in a Niña February. That is so weird to see on all the guidance. 

  • Like 5
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

We’re getting a pseudo El Niño pattern in a Niña February. That is so weird to see on all the guidance. 

I'm not shocked....I mentioned to Steve, 2014-2015 was the best QBO/solar match I could find...couple that with the subsurface warmth within the ENSO region, and bang. Furthermore, check out the analogs in this +TNH composite that I compiled for the late January/early February period in my outlook?

 

 
Here is a composite of seasons that fit this +TNH description over the past decade or so.
 
AVvXsEg-KIVp8hU8PURBMJV7lwVYVb6Od9Cagvv7
 

I also liked 2012-2013 as analog, but ultimately decided against using 2012-2013 and 2014-2015 because they were too warm ENSOish, but I thought they both had value for latter January into early February. Moving forward I am going to be more aggressive with straying from ENSO in my seasonal analog composite unless it's strong. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Typhoon Tip said:

It's a huge index signal centered around the 1st, + and/or - a couple of dates, which are derived from the ensembles.

Somewhat ironic, the same ensemble mass -fields that are analyzed in deriving those same index values, do not actually carry a significant event through that period

That is oddly troubling. 

Meanwhile, the operational versions have at least been off and on .. perhaps 50% of the time, plotting then not plotting significant events within that index-signaled window.  

That's what we are dealing with.  

Sometimes...  the ensemble means will actually collapse toward the denser physically applied operational flagship versions.  Rarer...but can happen in that direction.  If that is going to be the case this time... proooobably start to see some at least tentative operational agreement on which dates to center on.  So far...we've really seen 29/30th to 02/03 and all dates in between. Not really centering...  This may also come together/coalesce in guidance better after we get this present major off the boards.  

I will also add... purely from a climatology of major events historical perspective it is seldom that major winter storms occur in short order.   We've seen two moderate impact events pull that off in the past; aggregating to a major by weight of both kind of thing.  But this thing on Sun/Mon ... then having an 06z GFS 5 days later is rarely observed.

Let's get it on the 2nd and make my 40th bday epic :snowing:

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Prismshine Productions said:

Everyone overlooking the GEM... Dropped a 73 redux on South Carolina with sleet mixed in (anyone got the IP map by chance?) then started coming up the coaste33a41415acbce1cabc997b385043868.jpg

Sent from my SM-S166V using Tapatalk
 

Any storm dropping snowfall that far south will not be high end for us, unless it's a 1/100 year full phaser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Any storm dropping snowfall that far south will not be high end for us, unless it's a 1/100 year full phaser.

Unless of course it redevelops and stall after getting a jolt of upper air energy. FWIW Tips say back to back storm are rare  2011 2015 is knocking 

sn10_024h-imp.us_ne.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That storm on the GFS op has a ridiculous band of SN from MSY to ATL to CLT and then on up the coast. 12" of snow in MSY (the 06Z also had this, a year after they had their record snowfall; maybe we should all move to Bourbon Street), 2-3 feet on ATL (record is 8"). We manage 1-2' up here.

Would be wild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...