Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,460
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    kmsrocknj
    Newest Member
    kmsrocknj
    Joined

January 2026 regional war/obs/disco thread


Baroclinic Zone
 Share

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, Sey-Mour Snow said:

There have been several times in the last 5 years with ensembles showing 10-20” of snow as a mean and we end up with only a few inches over that span .. Something can pop up in the medium range after this weekend. Although it seems odds will increase much more after January 18th. 

Heh... pistol to head I'm more inclined to suggest the 13-16th based upon science of mass field modulation and correction ... 

The period after that isn't 'bad' per se, but honestly... we slip the +PNA and then see a new pattern signal right on it's heals that is an abrupt blossoming of a bona fide negative EPO ( not that weird N. Pac thing last month)  ...

I'm just referring to the actual spatial construct of the hemisphere in the deeper ranged ens system, all three agreeing in principle.   The problem with that is, we could observe a seesaw in the pattern just the same ... a flip back "warm" ( ish ) in the E. There's a spatial synoptic argument for it.  It shows up statistically/climatology on negative EPOs where a fair number of them actually drop heights in the W immediately downstream of the Alaskan sector ridge.   A variation that wouldn't likely be sussed out at this range necessarily.  I actually think in the winter where we have established cold on this side of the hemisphere, the flow rate will encourage lengthening L/W lengths ...that might offset the tucked west scenario, too.  So some help perhaps   

That all said, I don't see that as encouraging as this rather powerful looking +PNA burst that is happening in the foreground ... It starts ramping earlier actually... late this week, and maxes around or just prior to the 15th...

image.png.f17b381228e9f82558fd8572f544a699.png

Usually it is along or near the apex, we engender a bomb or a series with aggregate energy.  The operationals have a kind of 'correction vector' that is pointed toward amplitude when there is such a loud signal, yet they are lacking.   This signal predates their typical extended stochastic bs.     

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eduggs said:

Just a minor comment - triglycerides are not a form of cholesterol. They are lipids used to store excess carbs as fat. It's true that they will decrease if you reduce processed carbs and sugar intake. But they also sometimes increase in people who are trying to eat more healthily - particularly in people who increase consumption of vegetables and grains to compensate for a reduction in meat.

I have a dad-bod...but all of my labwork and BP are pristine at 45 years of age. Secret is weight training.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • 100% 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

Is there anyway you can delete or move all that shit out of the thread and enforce keeping it out ?

no one is forcing you to read people's opinions about how AGW could be impacting the weather and how to forecast it, and no one is forcing you to accept or agree with their opinions  

same goes for your opinions

  • Like 2
  • Weenie 1
  • Disagree 1
  • 100% 3
  • omg 2
  • clap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Damage In Tolland said:

I really wish they’d put a stop to this fake climate change talk BS on here . It’s absolutely nauseating and no one cares about the agenda nonsense.

 

 

 

 

 

 

56 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

Is there anyway you can delete or move all that shit out of the thread and enforce keeping it out ?

Agreez. Delete the above. 

  • Haha 2
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Heh... pistol to head I'm more inclined to suggest the 13-16th based upon science of mass field modulation and correction ... 

The period after that isn't 'bad' per se, but honestly... we slip the +PNA and then see a new pattern signal right on it's heals that is an abrupt blossoming of a bona fide negative EPO ( not that weird N. Pac thing last month)  ...

I'm just referring to the actual spatial construct of the hemisphere in the deeper ranged ens system, all three agreeing in principle.   The problem with that is, we could observe a seesaw in the pattern just the same ... a flip back "warm" ( ish ) in the E. There's a spatial synoptic argument for it.  It shows up statistically/climatology on negative EPOs where a fair number of them actually drop heights in the W immediately downstream of the Alaskan sector ridge.   A variation that wouldn't likely be sussed out at this range necessarily.  I actually think in the winter where we have established cold on this side of the hemisphere, the flow rate will encourage lengthening L/W lengths ...that might offset the tucked west scenario, too.  So some help perhaps   

That all said, I don't see that as encouraging as this rather powerful looking +PNA burst that is happening in the foreground ... It starts ramping earlier actually... late this week, and maxes around or just prior to the 15th...

image.png.f17b381228e9f82558fd8572f544a699.png

Usually it is along or near the apex, we engender a bomb or a series with aggregate energy.  The operationals have a kind of 'correction vector' that is pointed toward amplitude when there is such a loud signal, yet they are lacking.   This signal predates their typical extended stochastic bs.     

A very temp positive PNA before tanking once again, it’s a blimp not a regime shift

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...