Jump to content

  • Member Statistics

    18,321
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

November 2025 general discussions and probable topic derailings ...

Typhoon Tip

By Typhoon Tip,
in New England

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 752
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

alex
alex

Snowing well now

powderfreak
powderfreak

I always find snow lines interesting… like it was just cold enough 50 feet up the field to stick.

powderfreak
powderfreak

Solid sunset.

Posted Images

Typhoon Tip

Typhoon Tip

Posted
  • Author
Posted
33 minutes ago, ineedsnow said:

That would be great!

it's likely wrong... I mean for one, that model's not going to resolve idiosyncratic in situ synoptic elements, because the climatology normalizing aspect ends up muting those specific signals.   case in point, at 48 to 72 hours there's a lead s/w in Indian/southern Lakes, that skirts out ahead of the main trough, priory to it going through that amplitude out there are 84-96 ... that little piece of shit is a ruiner. it is in destructive interference with what probably could have been a CFS type solution. the CFS doesn't even have that lead wave.    the other guidance all do, and as a consequence have to generate a second wave forming along b-c axis down around eastern VA, but they then fail to really get it's act together soon enough ... the ensemble of the EPS bombs that that thing in the GOM... way to late (btw). 

If it were not for the lead pos mentioned above, than the event emphasis would probably be the feature.   it's not impossible that thing modulate in that direction but it would be pretty rare at this range for the the other more dependable guidance types.   

i was just bringing it up more tongue-in-cheek.  but yeah, it's nice eye candy.  ha.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dendrite

dendrite

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

Haven’t gotten above the long term average sub-32 hours at CON in October in like a decade, but we just don’t know why.  It could change next year.

Dry like the moon back then. Get those water vapor levels back down and we can heat up and cool down diurnally like Idaho. CON was really rad happy back then, but even on those 11° mornings the Franklin coop up here had 13° on both of those days.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dendrite

dendrite

Posted
Posted

I don’t even want to debate warming or melting. Can we all just agree that the CO2 isn’t normal? Can we at least try to get that back down to the baseline? It shouldn’t be a partisan thing. We’re all science people here. 
image.jpeg

  • 100% 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CoastalWx

CoastalWx

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, dendrite said:

I don’t even want to debate warming or melting. Can we all just agree that the CO2 isn’t normal? Can we at least try to get that back down to the baseline? It shouldn’t be a partisan thing. We’re all science people here. 
image.jpeg

Looks all natural to me. This has happened in the past even though it occurred exponentially slower compared to now. Nothing to see. Stop making a big deal out of it.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CoastalWx

CoastalWx

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Typhoon Tip said:

So if this Climate tainted version of the GFS model known as the CFS is going to be right ... one would think these 12z runs are going to have to at least start to represent. It's only 84 f'um hours away.   There's a bit of an implication there in the 'climate' part - where in the past, this kind of trough/synoptic evolution ended up producing an NJ model quick deepener/ with cold rain over to snows scenario. Why else is this model keep insisting this set up like below. It isn't the first run (0z) that was selling this. 

But of course we know now that CC's proooobably ruined that from ever happening going forward  .   It's okay - because CC doesn't exist anyway, right

 

image.png.15d17e209e8ad9460216d71034ca746f.png

Mark, is that you again?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
powderfreak

powderfreak

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, dendrite said:

 It shouldn’t be a partisan thing. We’re all science people here. 

I do always wonder if everyone just woke up one day, with no memory of the past and political parties and no memory of anyone trying to change anyone else's behavior... if we all just looked at the data now what would the conclusion be?

The minute anyone tried to change someone else's behavior is the minute the discussion changed.

We need that Men In Black pen to just reset everyone's mind.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dendrite

dendrite

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Looks all natural to me. This has happened in the past even though it occurred exponentially slower compared to now. Nothing to see. Stop making a big deal out of it.

yeah back when ineedsnow had T-rex running through his yard.

image.png

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CoastalWx

CoastalWx

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

I do always wonder if everyone just woke up one day, with no memory of the past and political parties and no memory of anyone trying to change anyone else's behavior... if we all just looked at the data now what would the conclusion be?

The minute anyone tried to change someone else's behavior is the minute the discussion changed.

We need that Men In Black pen to just reset everyone's mind.

So true. 
 

Anyways at least Tip just locked in a snow event for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dendrite

dendrite

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, weathafella said:

Happy Friday friends.  I love how we’re evolving this autumn.  I think we start fast-widespread snow before mid December.  I got down to 31 last night.  Had to wear a light winter jacket on last nights walk.

Yeah let’s do it. I’d like a front loaded winter with deeper pack at the solar min.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WinterWolf

WinterWolf

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, dendrite said:

I don’t even want to debate warming or melting. Can we all just agree that the CO2 isn’t normal? Can we at least try to get that back down to the baseline? It shouldn’t be a partisan thing. We’re all science people here. 
image.jpeg

You guys bring the shit up all the time. Take it to the proper thread.
 

And the data isn’t exactly iron clad either..that’s a problem in and of itself. 
 

but yes..let’s get back to current weather. 

  • Haha 1
  • Crap 1
  • omg 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dendrite

dendrite

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, WinterWolf said:

You guys bring the shit up all the time. Take it to the proper thread.
 

And the data isn’t exactly iron clad either..that’s a problem in and of itself. 
 

but yes..let’s get back to current weather. 

Please provide your alternative data, Mr. man of science.

  • Like 2
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snowcrazed71

Snowcrazed71

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Typhoon Tip said:

So if this Climate tainted version of the GFS model known as the CFS is going to be right ... one would think these 12z runs are going to have to at least start to represent. It's only 84 f'um hours away.   There's a bit of an implication there in the 'climate' part - where in the past, this kind of trough/synoptic evolution ended up producing an NJ model quick deepener/ with cold rain over to snows scenario. Why else is this model keep insisting this set up like below. It isn't the first run (0z) that was selling this. 

But of course we know now that CC's proooobably ruined that from ever happening going forward  .   It's okay - because CC doesn't exist anyway, right

 

image.png.15d17e209e8ad9460216d71034ca746f.png

I was just about to comment on Mark MoreGarbage's post on this ( Yes, I filed him a long time ago before I realized what a goon he was, but never unfollowed him because I get a kick out of his posts ). I asked him whenever has a CFS been a model that we would use, especially for something within about 4 days. This was his response

"Well, now you have seen someone use it.
I value consistency. In a world where all models are wrong, I pay attention to the ones that give a consistent message."

Hey, if this happens I will eat Crow.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WinterWolf

WinterWolf

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Snowcrazed71 said:

I was just about to comment on Mark MoreGarbage's post on this ( Yes, I filed him a long time ago before I realized what a goon he was, but never unfollowed him because I get a kick out of his posts ). I asked him whenever has a CFS been a model that we would use, especially for something within about 4 days. This was his response

"Well, now you have seen someone use it.
I value consistency. In a world where all models are wrong, I pay attention to the ones that give a consistent message."

Hey, if this happens I will eat Crow.

Lol..ya, consistently wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dendrite

dendrite

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, WinterWolf said:

The data is skewed..period.  But Please take to proper thread…Mr. stir the pot. 

The CO2 data has been measured with instrumentation since 1950 but okay. :lol: 
 

Contact an admin. Oh wait. 

  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...