Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,669
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    dorkchop
    Newest Member
    dorkchop
    Joined

Winter cancelled/uncancelled banter 25/26


Rjay
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 928
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I just don’t want the ZR, I’m pretty much fine with any other outcome at this point. 

I don’t recall too many ice storms growing up in CNJ, but there was one notable in my memory shortly after I started driving - had to be 2005 or 2006, I remember power sliding on the windy roads near my house trying to get home in the morning after sleeping over a friend’s house. Was driving an WRX at the time and distinctly remember feeling like it was the sole reason I didn’t end up in a tree. Was in interior Monmouth Co. Only cool thing is the unique crystallized look on surfaces, pass on everything else.  
 

I have though driven on ice covered mountain roads in Iceland a couple years ago, and it was a butt puckering experience I won’t soon forget. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jebman said:

Thus far tonight, 23 degrees, sleet and ZR bands continue apace, with half inch sleet accumulations on every surface, with about three sixteenths of an inch of pure ZR ice on top of that. The friction coefficient is extremely low and I have already experienced several near-disastrous episodes tonight as I tried my best to get sleet and ice accumulation measurements. Damn shoes are so slick! Railings are ice covered and VERY slippery, really not much help at all and I am most assuredly not the young man I once was and I really have to be super careful. This ain't 1994 no more! It's the mid 2020s and I'm OLD!

Oh man, Jeb is getting old?  Say it ain't so.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, NorthShoreWx said:

Slim chance of that.  I'll take the under.

I cashed out from NYC and put my money into yes for 20"+ in Boston and a little on 24"+. I'm thinking under 10" too especially how they measure but it should really rip until 2-3pm when sleet will barge in. And then it's a question of how much QPF as sleet, that counts too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jm1220 said:

I cashed out from NYC and put my money into yes for 20"+ in Boston and a little on 24"+. I'm thinking under 10" too especially how they measure but it should really rip until 2-3pm when sleet will barge in. And then it's a question of how much QPF as sleet, that counts too. 

Find out what the guys from the Central Park Conservancy are betting.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At one point humans were just living in caves and eating what they could hunt/find.

And now I'm on a plane 30k feet in air chatting with my wife on the ground and reading a weather forum...

 

I also had some beers in the airport and on the plane. Let's repeat this weekend.

 

That is all.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Volcanic Winter said:

Memorable for sure, I rate and enjoy cold so even without snow I appreciate the contrast to other winters this decade. 

Gonna be planning a hiking trip in CT for my bday in a few weeks, love getting out in cold air and snow. 

enjoy and happy early birthday, hope you turn 100

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, NorthShoreWx said:

I'm in the 'wipe the board on phase changes' camp. 

Here is an example scenario illustrating some of the possible outcomes of only wiping once per 24 hours and not at phase changes.   Some of it isn't that far off from the reality of yesterday's event:

 - location 1 gets 8" of low water content fluffy snow and the storm ends.

 - location 2 gets the same 8" of low water content fluffy snow which then switches to sleet and 2" of sleet accumulate on top of it.  By the end of the storm later that day the snow depth has compressed to 8" (or less).

 - location 3 gets 2" of sleet first, followed by the same 8" of fluffy snow.

- locations 1 and 2 report snowfall as the maximum depth of 8"

 - location 3 reports a maximum depth of 10" as the daily snowfall.

Location 3 no doubt had the deepest snow depth.  Location 2 and 3 had the exact same amount of snow and sleet, but a different entry in the climate record.

Location 2 had more than twice as much frozen precipitation as location 1, but the only way to tell that is from the SWE.  They each report the same amount of snow and sleet.

On thing that stands out as being lost in these examples is the standard that snowfall includes snow and sleet.  Does it really include sleet for location 2?

We know that snowfall is the most poorly measured element of weather, although I guess PWS wind measurements are right up there for different reasons. We almost need a separate thread for those of us that use a properly placed snowboard and clear using the same metrics. Your post though reminded me of many years ago, 2015 I want to say, a poster had say a 12” snowpack then reported 6” of pure fluff. The next day I asked them what their snowpack was and they said 18” and I just rolled my eyes as the odds of zero settling of fluff snow over 24 hours were zero to none. That’s not even getting into people not understanding sublimation.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...