Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,154
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

Winter 2025-26


Ji
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, IronTy said:

JB hinting to a December to Remember because of something something late hurricanes, something something, cold summer period, something something, probably also undersea seismic but I didn't get that far.  All that's left is to bring it home.

95-96 top analog yet?

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

We've had a hostile Arctic this late Spring/Summer so far

1-69.gif

It's been pretty amazing to not break 2012's arctic ice melt record for 13 years now. Since 2012, here are the analogs to pattern:

3aa-13.png

Following Winter:

3AAA-3.png

It seems to "snap back" in the Winter, with -AO

JB already foretold this a couple hours ago.  He didn't need all those fancy graphics though, just knowing hurricanes was enough for The Maestro.

I've got a good feeling, like last year I'm gonna go big on the snow totals contest.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Stormchaserchuck1 it’s not too surprising the mean anomaly you posted didn’t lead to snow most of the time. 
 

This look is decent but not really our snowy look 

3AAA-3.png.5fdc72baa305389dc2b2a3e26b000b7e.png

this is the snowy season composite for BWI 

878298718_15topsnowBWI.png.949c5439ca69adf2968d3b198dd1d167.png
Note the negative in the TN valley. That’s the sweet spot. The pacific and high lat look is close but with the anomalies centered to our north it’s a cold dry look. 
 

We really want a negative anomaly centered to our SW on a winter mean to have a good chance of a snowy winter. 
 

Almost every decently big snowstorm has that. And it takes us multiple wasted good opportunities to score a hit most of the time. And we can’t get a snowy winter without hitting a couple times. So…it’s really hard to get a snowy winter without a negative on the seasonal means there. 
 

No mot impossible. It’s happened a few times. But betting on something that’s only happened a few times in 75 years isn’t a good bet. 90% of our snowy winters have a negative centered to our southwest for the season. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

@Stormchaserchuck1 it’s not too surprising the mean anomaly you posted didn’t lead to snow most of the time. 
 

This look is decent but not really our snowy look 

3AAA-3.png.5fdc72baa305389dc2b2a3e26b000b7e.png

this is the snowy season composite for BWI 

878298718_15topsnowBWI.png.949c5439ca69adf2968d3b198dd1d167.png
Note the negative in the TN valley. That’s the sweet spot. The pacific and high lat look is close but with the anomalies centered to our north it’s a cold dry look. 
 

We really want a negative anomaly centered to our SW on a winter mean to have a good chance of a snowy winter. 
 

Almost every decently big snowstorm has that. And it takes us multiple wasted good opportunities to score a hit most of the time. And we can’t get a snowy winter without hitting a couple times. So…it’s really hard to get a snowy winter without a negative on the seasonal means there. 
 

No mot impossible. It’s happened a few times. But betting on something that’s only happened a few times in 75 years isn’t a good bet. 90% of our snowy winters have a negative centered to our southwest for the season. 

What I notice most is how backed up the mid-latitude jet is, as there are 3 regions with lower 500mb heights than the warmth to the north. When I mapped DC and Baltimore's top snowfalls/snowfall months/snowfall seasons, the same thing is true.. there are 3 areas of lower heights than even the -AO/-NAO +500mb heights to the north. This tells me that general -H5 is more important than having Polar blocking. I think the problem with my analogs is that the northern ridge is too far north: over 90N. 90N puts a mean trough at 45N, but not as much 39N. We need classic Greenland/Davis Strait blocking to do better. Unfortunately with Arctic ice melt, it's something that reverses 100% the following Winter, and that's centered 90N. I think this is why the new Euro seasonal has ridging/blocking centered at 90N. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...