Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Two Mdt to high impact events NYC subforum; wknd Jan 6-7 Incl OBS, and mid week Jan 9-10 (incl OBS). Total water equiv by 00z/11 general 2", possibly 6" includes snow-ice mainly interior. RVR flood potential increases Jan 10 and beyond. Damaging wind.


wdrag
 Share

Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, jbenedet said:

GEFS is south.

 

Bigger point is the way the surface high becomes one extended all the way to Bermuda. That’s a “too warm” problem for all densely populated locations along the coast. West is best.

IMG_0519.png

Nice to have a high to the "north" but that is far from a classic "look" for snow in the big cities.  Personally I like the "banana" look with center over the northern lakes.  That high position with marginal cold air to begin with ain't gonna cut it along and southeast of I95.  Even interior could have issues with mix depending on exact track.  I'm not sold on an all snow solution for any part of this sub forum to be honest.  I'm more concerned for further north coast hugger than suppression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 pages for a storm that's 6+ days out in an extremely fragile setup, which could easily miss us or just rain on us (along 95), tells us how snow-starved we all are.  I just like the fact that there's some chance of getting decent snow and something to track for a change.  We are certainly due for a little luck after watching every threat fizzle last winter and we haven't even had any real threats so far this winter.  

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RU848789 said:

6 pages for a storm that's 6+ days out in an extremely fragile setup, which could easily miss us or just rain on us (along 95), tells us how snow-starved we all are.  I just like the fact that there's some chance of getting decent snow and something to track for a change.  We are certainly due for a little luck after watching every threat fizzle last winter and we haven't even had any real threats so far this winter.  

If this was a week after the boxing day blizzard I think we'd be doing the same thing lol

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Concerning how close to us the track is at 144 hrs since amped systems like this often tick further west the closer in we get. Plus we have the cold bias with all the models running too cold this winter days 5-6. Then much of what the Euro shows is a mix along the coast but gets counted as SN in those 10:1 charts. 

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bluewave said:

Concerning how close to us the track is at 144 hrs since amped systems like this often tick further west the closer in we get. Plus we have the cold bias with all the models running too cold this winter days 5-6. Then much of what the Euro shows is a mix along the coast but gets counted as SN in those 10:1 charts. 

Need the 50 50 to hold 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bluewave said:

Concerning how close to us the track is at 144 hrs since amped systems like this often tick further west the closer in we get. Plus we have the cold bias with all the models running to cold this winter days 5-6. Then much of what the Euro shows is a mix along the coast but gets counted as SN in those 10-1 charts. 

With that high you think the models cold bias will hold in this situation? 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bluewave said:

Concerning how close to us the track is at 144 hrs since amped systems like this often tick further west the closer in we get. Plus we have the cold bias with all the models running too cold this winter days 5-6. Then much of what the Euro shows is a mix along the coast but gets counted as SN in those 10:1 charts. 

so you are taking the suppression solutions off the table ?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple things: Added WPC 17z met expert desk on winter wx.  They aren't perfect but they have tools we dont and faster. 

Also, I see a lot of references to big busts in the past. I think modeling has generally improved since 2020.   Maybe this is another but odds are against a 1/2"+ qpf miss I84 south. Ptype another story.

The 16z WPC QPF was probably made before GEFS 12z qpf... but now when you take the remaining ensembles from CMCE and probably the EPS...they have this more or less right in their 12z products. 

Also the thread was written for two storms... inclusive of large qpf by 00z/11 2-iso 6", potential for damaging wind and a snow event possibility to track. I dont think we said NYC would get heavy snow but we have members in CT/NJe PA that are interested.  If I were to write thread for only NYC... much less often.  

Screen Shot 2024-01-01 at 1.34.39 PM.png

Screen Shot 2024-01-01 at 1.35.11 PM.png

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • wdrag changed the title to Two Mdt to high impact events NYC subforum; wknd Jan 6-7 Incl OBS, and mid week Jan 9-10 (incl OBS). Total water equiv by 00z/11 general 2", possibly 6" includes snow-ice mainly interior. RVR flood potential increases Jan 10 and beyond. Damaging wind.
  • Rjay unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...