Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    23Yankee
    Newest Member
    23Yankee
    Joined

Dec 29-Jan 2 potential storm event


Brian D
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

The GFS has some similarities to what just happened.  A primary low tracking fairly far n/w with a secondary that forms and benefits the eastern sub.

Would actually be pretty comical to get missed to the east with a secondary twice in 1 

 Storm tracks once established love to stay that way. Would be third system for Eastern Ohio, Pennsylvania etc.. Then another coastal on the 4th possible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Cary67 said:

 Storm tracks once established love to stay that way. Would be third system for Eastern Ohio, Pennsylvania etc.. Then another coastal on the 4th possible

I'm not really a big believer in the idea of storm tracks following what happened earlier just because, but that GFS evolution was funny.  It's not even a basic suppressed solution with a low running from the GOM to Philly or something like that, it's literally the exact type of evolution that we just had with a primary tracking nw and then another low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hoosier said:

I'm not really a big believer in the idea of storm tracks following what happened earlier just because, but that GFS evolution was funny.  It's not even a basic suppressed solution with a low running from the GOM to Philly or something like that, it's literally the exact type of evolution that we just had with a primary tracking nw and then another low.

Too many winters have jackpot areas that seem to get hit over and over. DTW a few years back had the snow magnet.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Cary67 said:

Too many winters have jackpot areas that seem to get hit over and over. DTW a few years back had the snow magnet.

You're never gonna perfectly distribute the snowfall.  Certain types of tracks will win out over others in a given winter... I'm not denying that.  That doesn't mean other tracks can't occur depending on the setup at a particular time. 

A great example of a track not locking in is December 2000.  We had a rocking month and then could hardly buy any snow most of the rest of the way. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll see here shortly with the UKMET and then the Euro which way things are leaning. This past setup, I think the GFS having the support of the UKMET was key. It can be prone to some big swings but it's a solid model per verification stats, we just have less data available from it. If UKMET supports a GEM-like solution like the 12z run did and the ECMWF and EPS bumps again, we might be seeing a trend toward a GEM-like outcome.

 

Edit: and vice versa could be true too. Did notice that the spread of the GEFS members increased, which despite the op-like solution being still more favored could be a sign of lowering confidence in which scenario is more probable.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again FWIW, a decent number of GEFS members show some sort of secondary low action. Definitely a noticeable change from earlier. 
Yep just noticed the same thing and edited my post to reflect that. The GEFS still appears to follow the op more than the EPS does, 30 members vs 51 on the EPS may have something to do with that. That said, seeing a few members go toward a strong secondary might be a sign.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...