Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

July 17-19 Severe Weather


snowlover2
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

Between the 3 km NAM and recent HRRR, something is going to be massively off later on.  3 km NAM does fit the expected scenario better.

ARW/NMM/NSSL all bring in a fading MCS later, so that's likely the route to go. Not expecting any severe threat with it at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll take a stab and say that both referenced models may be slightly off.  Yes, I expect t storms in Chicago metro in the wee hours of the morning, but SPC in their mid day discussion says they expect rapid t storm development in the Upper Midwest in the 20-23z time period and possibly the extension of the enhanced more se into se MN and central WI.  I didn't think the models had the storms initially firing that early in the time period.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Stebo said:

Of the two handling the current situation the HRRR is doing better. 

Here's what it has at 10z Sun.  No complex anywhere near southern WI, northern IL, southern Lake Michigan, etc.  Seems unlikely given other models (and the Euro which has had storms moving into the aforementioned area for days now)

 

ref1km_ptype.us_mw.thumb.png.551218eb16980029179060c0c5c3014b.png

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

Here's what it has at 10z Sun.  No complex anywhere near southern WI, northern IL, southern Lake Michigan, etc.  Seems unlikely given other models (and the Euro which has had storms moving into the aforementioned area for days now)

 

ref1km_ptype.us_mw.thumb.png.551218eb16980029179060c0c5c3014b.png

Yeah I am just going on the currents comparatively. Who knows what happens tonight at this rate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They expanded the slight risk for tomorrow to now include se MI, most of Ohio and most of central IN.

Quote

...Great Lakes and Ohio Valley region...

   A shortwave trough will move through the Great Lakes on Sunday
   accompanied by a cold front. By 12Z Sunday the front should extend
   from a surface low in Ontario, southwest through the upper Great
   Lakes and central Plains. This boundary will move east and southeast
   during the day, likely extending from the lower Great Lakes through
   the Ohio Valley. A moist boundary layer with upper 60s to around 70
   F dewpoints will reside in the pre-frontal warm sector, contributing
   to moderate instability with 2000-2500 J/kg MLCAPE as the boundary
   layer warms. Thunderstorms will likely be ongoing, mainly across
   portions of MI. It is possible some of this activity might pose an
   ongoing threat for a few strong wind gusts, but it will most likely
   weaken during the morning. Additional storms are expected to develop
   along the cold front and residual outflow boundary across the OH
   Valley region. This area will reside south of stronger winds aloft
   with weak vertical shear expected. However, the thermodynamic
   environment may be sufficient for a threat of isolated locally
   strong wind gusts with multicell lines and clusters during the
   afternoon. 

 

day2otlk_1730.gif

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wisconsinwx said:

Perked up right before the lake with a very solid garden variety storm.  Tons of heavy rain and lightning, about 40mph gusts.

Cool and unexpected little event.  Gust were dam close to 50 it seemed.   She got a little hairy when it moved through. Power outages were dancing through my head. 

KMWC @ 54mph gust

KMKE @ 47mph 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice soundings out of MPX (Minne) and DVN (Quad Cities) this evening. The classic 700-500mb lapse rates don't necessarily tell the story; LR are very steep just below there. Looks like the capping inversion was near 850mb at DVN and around 800mb at MPX. 

2089071257_ScreenShot2020-07-18at8_09_58PM.thumb.png.31c51487ba4ed455235faa09584b3d1e.png951345286_ScreenShot2020-07-18at8_08_31PM.thumb.png.0fbc5bb5ed322df6ce657b78e760880a.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 12k NAM is a bit better but I don't know if I buy the front being dragged so quickly East with no significant convection. The evolution of the model is right but I would take what happens overnight and tomorrow and drag it back West/Northwest about 100-200 miles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like clear skies ahead of the QLCS. Should allow for quick heating.

The more interesting thing to see will be if the QLCS maintains its integirty and reintensifies for a formidable severe threat. The 06z NAM certainly hints at this outcome.

The instability is already there, and good moisture advection is ongoing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...