40/70 Benchmark Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 1 minute ago, CoastalWx said: Euro is gonna try I think. May not be like yesterday..but seems better than 00z. I would want something in between. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 It's trying....Really going negative quick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 1 minute ago, CoastalWx said: It's trying....Really going negative quick. Even the 00z GFS almost backed it west of due N for a time....need to watch that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Just now, CoastalWx said: It's trying....Really going negative quick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 I dont see much improvements. The northern stream is flying across canada. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Marked improvement I thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Just now, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said: I dont see any improvements. The northern stream is flying across canada. Spiked eggnog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 If the nrn stream slowed a tad and srn stream hung west a tad..it would be close to a James solution. At least in my eyes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 1 minute ago, CoastalWx said: Marked improvement I thought. we defer to you, obviously...looks like dog poo to me with how proggy the trough is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Just now, CoastalWx said: If the nrn stream slowed a tad and srn stream hung west a tad..it would be close to a James solution. At least in my eyes. Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: Spiked eggnog. Never gonna get a bomb solution with a northern low screaming across the Great Lakes, imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoth Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 When can we expect this energy to be decently sampled? In a data sparse region ATM, correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Just now, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said: we defer to you, obviously...looks like dog poo to me with how proggy the trough is. The nrn stream is fast, agreed. But I guess looking at 0z vs 12z...I like how 12z kept a concise nrn stream s/w and srn stream s/w. 00z has that hang back tail of vorticity that can be tough to straighten out in time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 That's a pretty strong hi in the North Atlantic With that tend to push the storm back to the west of it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 1 minute ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said: Never gonna get a bomb solution with a northern low screaming across the Great Lakes, imo. Its all about timing, and it wasn't far off. Unlikely, sure...always is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 1 minute ago, CoastalWx said: The nrn stream is fast, agreed. But I guess looking at 0z vs 12z...I like how 12z kept a concise nrn stream s/w and srn stream s/w. 00z has that hang back tail of vorticity that can be tough to straighten out in time. The s stream was diffuse at 00z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 5 minutes ago, Hoth said: When can we expect this energy to be decently sampled? In a data sparse region ATM, correct? Euro would suggest the "southern" stream wave is hanging around the Yukon right now, but the northern stream wave is still over the Pacific and not forecast to come over land until possibly as late as 12z Mon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 This is Feb 1979 redeaux ugh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoth Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Just now, OceanStWx said: Euro would suggest the "southern" stream wave is hanging around the Yukon right now, but the northern stream wave is still over the Pacific and not forecast to come over land until possibly as late as 12z Mon. Great, gracias. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 1 minute ago, Ginx snewx said: This is Feb 1979 redeaux ugh Minus the historic mid atl blizzard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: Minus the historic mid atl blizzard. 25 inches 5"/h at times. Most intense rates of my life kdov Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 2 minutes ago, mahk_webstah said: 25 inches 5"/h at times. Most intense rates of my life kdov I dont recall a Feb 1979 blizzard, where was it exactly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Just now, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said: I dont recall a Feb 1979 blizzard, where was it exactly? In the mid atlantic on president's day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 A full on heavy blizzard at least for Delaware and I think Baltimore-Washington up to about Philadelphia and across South Jersey. In the days before it was forecast be a week low out to seA by the weather models at times. But a forecastersomewhere look at the set up and predicted a heavy snowstorm for the middle Atlantic. There's an article on that somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Go Kart Mozart Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 1 minute ago, mahk_webstah said: A full on heavy blizzard at least for Delaware and I think Baltimore-Washington up to about Philadelphia and across South Jersey. In the days before it was forecast be a week low out to seA by the weather models at times. But a forecastersomewhere look at the set up and predicted a heavy snowstorm for the middle Atlantic. There's an article on that somewhere. I believe they had 15" on the Brooklyn beaches, 8" in The Bronx. The immortal PDI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 I also remember that it was an extremely coldFebruary in Dover Delaware. I think the blizzard came at the end of that arctic outbreak Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 So really, that was PD2 and 2003 was PD3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 2 minutes ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said: So really, that was PD2 and 2003 was PD3. No. PD one was 1979 and pd 2twas 2003No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.