Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    19,006
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    loganboehmewx
    Newest Member
    loganboehmewx
    Joined

Major Hurricane Irma


NJwx85

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 minute ago, Stormlover74 said:

Landfall is not east though, its southwest of where it was and impacts GA much more this run than SC

Exactly... Not really an "east trend" per se... Just the model making minor adjustments over the last few runs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jojo762 said:

Exactly... Not really an "east trend" per se... Just the model making minor adjustments over the last few runs. 

Nothing past Hour 96 can be taken seriously because models and their individual runs have been all over the place - this thing can still end up striking somewhere on the Gulf Coast or anywhere on the eastern seaboard from south Florida to Maine

gfs_mslp_wind_seus_17.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TriPol said:

Is there a map to see how the SST of right now compare to the avg 30-year sst in the Atlantic and Caribbean? I'm wondering why the waters are so hot right now?

anoma.9.4.2017.gif

This has been many years we've seen them, but FL has had an exceptionally warm summer as well (relative to avg for them).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, pazzo83 said:

I'd love to hear the meteorological explanation for this decoupling -> I mean have we ever seen a 180mph cane with a pressure around 930mb?

Surely one of the more experienced, "tropical experts" in here might be able to chime in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will however say that the trend of the GFS to hang the trough back longer over the east coast needs to be watched very closely. I'd be hedging against a track west of the 12z GFS until we see that trend stop.

That trough/ULL is make or break on the forecast. I still set my sights up the EC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any reason to doubt the SFMR readings the NHC used as the basis for the 180mph intensity? When I checked satellite this morning I was expecting 160-170mph based on the size of the eye and the warmer cloud tops than last night (also warmer compared to the strongest Cat5s on IR). So I was surprised to see the NHC had set the intensity to 180mph. The central pressure also seems a little high for a strong Cat5. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, skierinvermont said:

Is there any reason to doubt the SFMR readings the NHC used as the basis for the 180mph intensity? When I checked satellite this morning I was expecting 160-170mph based on the size of the eye and the warmer cloud tops than last night (also warmer compared to the strongest Cat5s on IR). So I was surprised to see the NHC had set the intensity to 180mph. The central pressure also seems a little high for a strong Cat5. 

Just got 160kt SFMR, so I would believe it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...