Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Extremely boring and mild starting later this week. Too bad we can’t squeeze in one more.
  3. Whole thing is becoming C-1” on guidance.
  4. Looks like Meso’s like the Pike Region tomorrow, NAM not so much.
  5. Let's try to bring 1998 further south
  6. Today
  7. NAM and RGEM look like they would pretty icy beyond hr 84
  8. Nice. 1888 was just based on NESIS and COOP data, it's nothing special just had to go off whatever is out there since it's so incredibly old. We were still riding around on horses, wild to think about. Everything was done manually in Photoshop and exported as a jpg. I have that and the original psd file for everything, almost 2k files of each. So nothing is vector based. Thanks for all your help over the years.
  9. I hope all of Chuck's plantings are destroyed by frost or freeze
  10. Driving through the early January 2003 event just south of Worcester on 146 around midnight was some of the most difficult driving of my life. March 6, 2001 around New Haven around midnight on 95 was epic as well. December 23, 1997 around noontime 10 miles N of Dedham was also epic.
  11. Cat 2 on NESIS and Cat 3 on RSI, I think the latter is a far better representation of this storm’s magnitude despite not quite hitting all of the population centers as hard as it could’ve, like some in the past (PDII, Jan 1996, Feb 1983, etc). If the core Boston area had gotten 2 feet instead of 15”, it’d easily be a Cat 4 on the RSI.
  12. you paid pre-tariff prices. now you only get 2 months and change.
  13. somewhat political, but we just launched strikes against Iran. Looks like they were designed to take out Iranian leadership.
  14. This storm has been rated a high end Cat 3 on the RSI scale for the Northeast, which to me seems like a fair ranking considering it didn’t quite bullseye most of the population centers with the heaviest amounts, missed DC/Baltimore entirely, and was fairly confined to the coast. However, it produced historic or near historic snowfall amounts over the area it did strongly affect and did drop 20+” on most of the NYC metro. Way better than NESIS IMO.
  15. I'm not giving up. I paid for 3 months of winter and that's what I'm hoping for.
  16. Interesting to see this chart. I am in the agriculture business and we have farms in FL (in the Lakeland area). Per my coworkers (I just joined in late 2025), we've deployed more anti-freeze measures this winter (i.e. running water at night-14 nights so far) than any year since we've owned these assets (late 90's).
  17. There were several other reports from near 3k feet in that area and none were close to that total until you got west of the Allegheny front from upslope. As a skier I am well aware of how EVERY ski resort inflates snowfall. Not some. Not sometimes. Every single one every single time! Some do it by making their official measurement spot a bowl location that they know is a local max zone on the mountain. Others just flat out make up a number. But in 30 years of skiing having been in at least 30 snow events at 20 different resorts not once did any of them report the snowfall honestly. I was just at Killington last weekend and they got about 6” and reported 11. It’s just what they do.
  18. 2-4 inches bands per hour. Insane bands
  19. 13 hours below freezing and 11 hours above isn't the fastest melt.
  20. I'm downgrading to a B+ Damn people who rate this winter as an A+ are sinners I'll tell yah. Weenies! Damn it, I may start smashing stuff and junk ...
  21. Globals also. Weaker and further south. Dusting to inch in spots.
  22. thank you sir... why does weather app say 46 it's weird
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...