All Activity
- Past hour
-
This is just complete model porn if you've researched and tracked these things for 25 years. Just absolutely SICK looking 500mb chart. I have NEVER seen one look this good for our area (GA/SC/NC) from just a general winter storm perspective, regardless of where you find yourself in the precip type category.
-
Possible Record Breaking Cold + Snow 1/25 - 1/26
SACRUS replied to TriPol's topic in New York City Metro
GGEM / GEPS -
I was in Atlanta for a wedding during an ice storm in the late 90's. Dont remember the exact date. I was in Conyers actually. The house I was ain backed up to a pine forest. And I can still remember the sound of 15 inch diameter pine trees snapping in half. Power was out for days. It was one of the most incredible weather related things I have ever seen/heard.
-
Possible Record Breaking Cold + Snow 1/25 - 1/26
MANDA replied to TriPol's topic in New York City Metro
15:1 possible assuming soundings are favorable. Me personally I'd stick with 12:1 for now when calculating snowfall off the current QPF forecasts. Not to mention in a long duration storm the ratios can change from high to low or vice versa during the storm duration. Death bands can produce great ratios. So maybe a storm that has 10:1 to 20:1 throughout the storm duration averages out to 15:1 when all is said and done. Just to early make ratio forecasts. Way to premature to even stay 15:1 IMO. -
-
1/23/26-1/25/26 Winter Storm Thread
Holston_River_Rambler replied to AMZ8990's topic in Tennessee Valley
I was hesitant to mention it, but there were also sightings of the elk this fall at an even lower elevation than the last time we saw it nearby. I myself did not see it, so I’m not sure if it counts. -
-
That's what I remember from 2010. I mean every broadcast it kept going up and up and up...and my mom and I were like "HERE?"
-
Hasn't the Richmond area been in the bullseye for a few days now? That has got to be a record in consistency.
-
close to 3' in Cape-town
-
MO/KS/AR/OK 2025-2026 Winter Discussion
MUWX replied to stormdragonwx's topic in Central/Western States
Watches coming out now. I thought they might wait until tomorrow, but Oklahoma offices are pulling the trigger now and I assume the rest will follow. -
Possible Record Breaking Cold + Snow 1/25 - 1/26
mob1 replied to TriPol's topic in New York City Metro
-
Possible Record Breaking Cold + Snow 1/25 - 1/26
BoulderWX replied to TriPol's topic in New York City Metro
You asked a question. Many people replied with detailed answers. At this point just go with what you think best. No need to debate it. Most of us agree it’s best to wait to figure details like snow ratio out. If you don’t want to, then just multiply what you think ratios will be X Qpf output and have a field day with it -
Didn’t see the EuroAI ensembles posted, but has 1” QPF to DC-Annapolis or so. Based on H5, looks to my eye like the mean has better phasing than the Op EuroAI. Overall a really strong 12z suite. Not as consistent as 0z and 6z thanks to the GFS and AIGFS, but otherwise great consensus.
-
-
Gotcha that makes sense, that's why the thermals were so much worse with the intial WAA precip, because of the retreating high
-
Unfortunately for the ATL area, the atmosphere on the 12Z Euro has warmed notably vs the prior 2 runs, especially at/near 850 mb. Thus, the WxBell Euro’s ptype, which is clearly almost all ZR even without looking at soundings, isn’t debatable. The 12Z Euro has ~2.3” qpf of wintry precip, with the vast majority being ZR, falling over a 36 hour period from hour 99 (10 AM Sat 1/24) til hour 135 (10 PM Sun 1/25). The coldest is from Sat evening through the entire night with mid 20s. Fortunately it’s still out 4-5.5 days and obviously a lot can change. This as well as recent runs are in the ballpark of worst case scenarios for there, a colder version of Jan 1973 (which was only barely <32). So, keep hope alive as just about any change would be better than what this run shows. As ominous as this is, it still being out 4-5.5 days leaves notable opportunity for improvement from the worst case.
-
Don't' go chasing shortwaves, please stick with the clown maps and Bastardi quotes you're used to.
-
2025-2026 Fall/Winter Mountain Thread
buckeyefan1 replied to Buckethead's topic in Southeastern States
I absolutely love ya’ll! It’s why I’m still here after 20+ years -
I saw a groundhog roaming around at Scooter's Coffee(great place on the west end here!) during the middle of winter last week. I should have known we were in trouble then.
-
Possible Record Breaking Cold + Snow 1/25 - 1/26
NEG NAO replied to TriPol's topic in New York City Metro
1. This will be a very cold setup 2. The storm track won't favor a very windy event -
Anyone have the latest Euro sleet/ice map? GA specifically please
-
Texas 2026 Discussion/Observations
aggiegeog replied to Stx_Thunder's topic in Central/Western States
Norman is the first office to issue watches for this, many more to come. -
Possible Record Breaking Cold + Snow 1/25 - 1/26
TriPol replied to TriPol's topic in New York City Metro
The density and structure of snowflakes are influenced by wind. Strong winds can cause sheer forces and collision forces that can break up delicate snowflakes and cause damage to them before they fall to the ground. When a snowflake breaks up, it will typically become much smaller and denser than an intact snowflake because the intact snowflake has significant amount of air trapped within it, which enables snowflakes to be stacked on top of each other. When snowflakes are broken up due to wind, they will lose their structure, making it impossible to stack them. Therefore they will not develop the same amount of height per volume of water as intact snowflakes due to density. As a second point, strong winds often contain turbulent airflows and sublimation. Because they contain a high ratio of surface area to mass, smaller fragments of snowflake are more likely to be partially sublimated away or lifted into the upper atmosphere than intact snowflakes. Thus, much of the snowflakes created by strong winds won't reach the ground where we measure snow accumulation. Thus, the end result is a classic example of meteorological misrepresentation. When looking at radar images and the equivalent liquid from the snowfall, they may appear to be large amounts of moisture, but the awash in total in the ground will be relatively small when compared to the amount of snow that fell as part of the event. This is why windy events tend to produce low totals even when the snow continues to fall steadily. -
Pittsburgh/Western PA WINTER ‘25/‘26
colonel717 replied to Burghblizz's topic in Upstate New York/Pennsylvania
NWS Pgh discussion Starting to hear alot of chatter about snow this weekend? Lets break down the forecast and discuss some potential outcomes, and have a moment to talk about forecast uncertainty: We like to think about the forecast as a train heading into the rail yard. You start on one track. As you go through time, that one track turns into two, then perhaps four, and eventually, you could end up with tens on potential tracks the train could take as it arrives. Lets think of these tracks as potential scenarios for the weather. You start off the forecast process right now on one track (there is really only one scenario for what's happening right now). Out a couple days, there may be a couple scenarios for what weather might happen. If you go out as far as 5-7 days, the forecast has a good deal of uncertainty with many potential scenarios. Ironically, much of the uncertainty in the weekend storm (most likely to happen between Saturday night and Monday) will come down to "tracks" (not the railroad ones). For simplicity, well break the storm potential down into three scenarios... Scenario #1: The storm track stays well to the south and the area ends up with very little to no snow. This would produce <1" of snow accumulations, if any. This scenario is around 20% likely at this point given current weather prediction guidance. While mostly dry, scenario would be the coldest (temperatures 20-30F below average). Scenario #2: The storm track forms to the south and then curves north as it heads towards the mid-Atlantic region. In this scenario, the region would see snow, but not the worst of the storm. This storm track would produce notable accumulations (likely >1" but <6"). This scenario is around 50% likely at this point given current weather prediction guidance. Scenario #3: The storm track forms to the south then curves up the spine of the Appalachians before reforming off the coast. In this scenario, the region would see the heaviest snow from the storm. This track would produce heavy accumulations (likely >6" to as much as 12"). But this scenario is 30% at this time given current weather prediction guidance. Given the current forecast, here's what we know right now: eastern Ohio and northwest PA have the lowest probability of warning criteria snow (>6"), while the ridges of PA/WV have the highest probability of warning criteria snow). Remember, staying in tune with the forecast will be important, because as we draw closer, we will know more information and gather forecast confidence as we narrow down the amount of potential "tracks" and iron out more specific details of snow amounts and impacts.
