Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,649
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    BroadWing3544
    Newest Member
    BroadWing3544
    Joined

The Allsnow Blizzard of 2026


Rjay
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, NEG NAO said:

time will tell thats all I have to say

And therein lies part of the problem. People have been calling this a historic storm now for 24 hours before even a flake falls.
 

 I'm not even sure what the word historic means anymore, to break into the top 20 the city needs 15.4 inches from the storm. Would that be historic? If they get 15.3 is that not historic? They got 11.4 inches last month so if they get 11.3 is that a bust? 
 

I get the excitement and I hope it is a great storm, but people calling a storm historic before anything happens.......

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said:

12z HREF through tomorrow 12z:

image.thumb.png.8606032510285fe44f4bc10b2941a834.png

Even if on deducts one category, NYC has 12"-15" of snow by 12z tomorrow on the HREF.

What are your thoughts on the GFS and general model cut-backs? Could the further south solution be due to the warmer water temps being south?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, NEG NAO said:

problem I see - the Nam cut totals at 12Z and the Canadian already had reduced total at 0Z Last night

sn10_acc-imp.us_ne.png

 

Speaking as a member of the N & W crowd I'm with you.  There were some concerning signals popping up last evening.  One reason I did not go higher than 12-18".  Even thought about leaving my 10-15" forecast alone.  Not a good thing when you have to rely on banding and ratios to get you to the finish line.  It can get you there but you don't want to have to depend on it.  I just want to get 12" here to verify my forecast.  Personally I think the 18" high end is fading for this area and for near certain N & W of here.  Just gotta watch radar and mesos from here on in.  One of my concerns has always been the RGEM was never on board for big totals out this way.  The RGEM is not a trash model.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CPcantmeasuresnow said:

And therein lies part of the problem. People have been calling this a historic storm now for 24 hours before even a flake falls.
 

 I'm not even sure what the word historic means anymore, to break into the top 20 the city needs 15.4 inches from the storm. Would that be historic? If they get 15.3 is that not historic? They got 11.4 inches last month so if they get 11.3 is that a bust? 
 

I get the excitement and I hope it is a great storm, but people calling a storm historic before anything happens.......

I would rate historic as in the top 10 % of all time greatest snowstorms

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Literally zero support for this 

You like looking at 3 models with the lowest totals and selectively forgetting the models that do show more and deciding that's your forecast. They like to see a sub 970 low crawling up the coast and chilling by Atlantic City and extrapolate that the higher end of model guidance is more likely since that should dump a ton of snow.


.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every time, no matter what happens, remember it is out of our control. All of it is. No matter if it surprises or disappoints, you can’t change it. Maybe you want to prove you’re smarter or better one or another, but no matter what you think, you have no impact on the final outcome. Enjoy the journey.


.

  • clap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CPcantmeasuresnow said:

And therein lies part of the problem. People have been calling this a historic storm now for 24 hours before even a flake falls.
 

 I'm not even sure what the word historic means anymore, to break into the top 20 the city needs 15.4 inches from the storm. Would that be historic? If they get 15.3 is that not historic? They got 11.4 inches last month so if they get 11.3 is that a bust? 
 

I get the excitement and I hope it is a great storm, but people calling a storm historic before anything happens.......

I thought it’s mostly historic cuz of the strength and wind. The snow totals other than the NAM/GFS haven’t been that historic for NYC. It’ll be a historic snowfall for the NJ coast. 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jt17 said:


You like looking at 3 models with the lowest totals and selectively forgetting the models that do show more and deciding that's your forecast. They like to see a sub 970 low crawling up the coast and chilling by Atlantic City and extrapolate that the higher end of model guidance is more likely since that should dump a ton of snow.


.

As of latest cycle there is not one model that paints 20+ for all of nj, nyc, and Long Island. Only the NAM had that to begin with. 
 

all I’m saying is their isn’t support for those numbers as “expected” especially in the western part of the area - when all short range models have scaled back and come closer to the globals. 
 

going to be an amazing storm. Just keeping it real. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, North and West said:

Every time, no matter what happens, remember it is out of our control. All of it is. No matter if it surprises or disappoints, you can’t change it. Maybe you want to prove you’re smarter or better one or another, but no matter what you think, you have no impact on the final outcome. Enjoy the journey.


.

this. its just all the people who downplayed it, well, can you blame them? storm hasn't gotten going yet, so we wait for nws to start dropping totals and making excuses. and, its really hard to get a blockbuster in cnj in late feb....boston different story. i have no idea what will happen but frankly, at 63 and no garage to keep equipment in, 2 feet is a bit much for me. i've got to dig my stuff out of a shed at the other end of the yard...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RDRY said:

East tics have now taken the heavy band offshore On the GFS. It's 6-8 if that happens.

How is this helpful to anyone? First, 6-8 where? Even if you take the GFS verbatim, it’s pumping out over an inch liquid for a large portion of the forum. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...