Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,690
    Total Members
    11,691
    Most Online
    dorkchop
    Newest Member
    dorkchop
    Joined

It's not coming 1/31-2/1 2026


Rjay
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, eduggs said:

The RGEM run isn't encouraging. Worst run in several cycles. And the excellent run-to-run consistency dating back a few days further decreases the chances of last minute positive changes.

Yeah we need consistent NW trends at this point, not wishy washy a little jump NW then back SE. At 0z if we don’t see that then I’m calling it dead. 

  • Like 3
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, eduggs said:

The ICON ensembles have about a tenth liquid back to NYC. So really just a few outlier individual members with a glancing hit. This is a little better than 6z and a little worse than 0z. Just enough interest for false hope.

I fully expect the euro gfs cmc to kill this within the next 2 hours and then we can move on to the 6-14 threats 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 9z SREF is really juiced up. The mean is over 0.25" liquid at NYC (3z was a little less). I count 11 hits and 13 misses among the members. A few of the hits are major. This is the weeniest of weenie "models." But I still prefer seeing it increase QPF rather than decrease it run to run.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like everything is converging on a track a little out to sea. Nw ticks shouldn't be taken as a sign of hope - they're just converging. The ones that were nw have corrected se, and the very se ones are correcting nw.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Stormlover74 said:

I never quite understand using ensembles at this range. Seems like they are always better than the op and give false hope

Ensembles are better at longer lead time to get an idea of the likelihood of a storm, i.e. 40 or 50%. We definitely were in the game a few days ago given the setup. But they smooth things out too much because of outliers and lower resolution so closer in we use the op models and it’s clear now there are a bunch of negative factors getting in the way of a big storm outcome that they pick up on. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is like watching a Jet game where they're hanging in there but you know what's likely going to happen.  Not what's definitely going to happen, just what's likely going to happen.  It's turned out favorably a few times before, so you keep watching, but deep down you just know you should be cleaning the garage or changing the oil right now.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TJW014 said:

Fairly confident in at least a 2-4" event down here. Makes up for the 6-8" we lost from last weekend due to sleet/ice.

Seems like wishful thinking I’m thinking you guys get maybe an inch 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, coastalplainsnowman said:

This is like watching a Jet game where they're hanging in there but you know what's likely going to happen.  Not what's definitely going to happen, just what's likely going to happen.  It's turned out favorably a few times before, so you keep watching, but deep down you just know you should be cleaning the garage or changing the oil right now.

Good analogy, it's pretty much been like being down 10-3 the whole time but with the jets offense you just know the game is probably over even though it's close. 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, coastalplainsnowman said:

This is like watching a Jet game where they're hanging in there but you know what's likely going to happen.  Not what's definitely going to happen, just what's likely going to happen.  It's turned out favorably a few times before, so you keep watching, but deep down you just know you should be cleaning the garage or changing the oil right now.

Giants game would be if we had a decent snowfall projected by models all week, then in the last day (4th quarter) everything collapses and we get no snow. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eduggs said:

The ICON ensembles have about a tenth liquid back to NYC. So really just a few outlier individual members with a glancing hit. This is a little better than 6z and a little worse than 0z. Just enough interest for false hope.

If we use 100:1 ratios we have a decent snowstorm 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...