Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,554
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RHiggins
    Newest Member
    RHiggins
    Joined

January 24-25: Miracle or Mirage


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, andyhb said:

The PDII comparisons starting to flash into the picture.

I’m not sold on the PDII comparison quite yet because the QPF progs aren't showing that level of saturation. During PDII, we saw persistent mesoscale banding with radar returns so intense they would have prompted flash flood warnings in the summer.

That setup featured a textbook 'tropical tap' where a deep moisture plume from both the Gulf AND the Atlantic converged. The Water Transport was so off the charts because you had a secondary low off the Carolinas acting as a pump, feeding a SSE-to-NNW moisture flux directly into the cold dome.

Lift was maximized because that 1040mb Arctic High was so anchored, creating a steep vertical 'ramp' for the moisture to climb. We ended up with 2.5 to 3.5 inches of liquid equivalent (QPF) across the board.

Sure we have the 1040 high this time.. but as of now, this current setup looks more like a standard Gulf-dominant system—it lacks that intense Atlantic inflow and the same degree of frontogenesis we saw in '03. It has potential, but the 'firehose' isn't there yet.  Could change.. hopefully it does.  If I remember, PD2 was a 1 foot deal on the inital warnings.. only after it started training we started to see the 18-24 numbers show up in the warnings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SnowenOutThere said:

No, no lets not reshuffle like that. Genuine question is where do you see the north shift coming from? Synoptically I have a hard time seeing how much further it can go north with a solution like the 18z Euro as it has a perfect phase.

Agree and this is got  a huge cold high pressure just about squatting over PA , I’m glad this low has moxie 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MDScienceTeacher said:

I’m not sold on the PDII comparison quite yet because the QPF progs aren't showing that level of saturation. During PDII, we saw persistent mesoscale banding with radar returns so intense they would have prompted flash flood warnings in the summer.

That setup featured a textbook 'tropical tap' where a deep moisture plume from both the Gulf AND the Atlantic converged. The Water Transport was so off the charts because you had a secondary low off the Carolinas acting as a pump, feeding a SSE-to-NNW moisture flux directly into the cold dome.

Lift was maximized because that 1040mb Arctic High was so anchored, creating a steep vertical 'ramp' for the moisture to climb. We ended up with 2.5 to 3.5 inches of liquid equivalent (QPF) across the board.

 

Sure we have the 1040 high this time.. but as of now, this current setup looks more like a standard Gulf-dominant system—it lacks that intense Atlantic inflow and the same degree of frontogenesis we saw in '03. It has potential, but the 'firehose' isn't there yet.  Could change.. hopefully it does.  If I remember, PD2 was a 1 foot deal on the inital warnings.. only after it started training we started to see the 18-24 numbers show up in the warnings.

What about DC metro mixing over to sleet then back to snow? Still think this storm will be similar to PDII in that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bncho said:

Okay, according to some peeps on SouthernWX, they say that the GFS 0z is using extra information about that Baja low. I don't buy it.

I'm pretty sure that won't be included till 12z tomorrow at the very earliest. I wouldn't take the recon into consideration till like wednesday night runs at the earliest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bncho said:

Okay, according to some peeps on SouthernWX, they say that the GFS 0z is using extra information about that Baja low. I don't buy it.

Huh? They also don’t want it to move north so think it’s wrong lol

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...