Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,533
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RHiggins
    Newest Member
    RHiggins
    Joined

January 24-25: Miracle or Mirage


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Scraff said:

Always curious which snowfall clown map to focus on. 10:1 or Kuchera? Or does the answer lie somewhere in between? 

I would primarily focus on QPF for now, the Kuchera algorithm can be wonky. Having said that, I would expect favorable snow growth that would yield >10:1 ratios particularly in the second half of the storm. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Scraff said:

Always curious which snowfall clown map to focus on. 10:1 or Kuchera? Or does the answer lie somewhere in between? 

I would think for Baltimore area - north the Kuchera Ratio would be more accurate (if we want to call it that - - maybe "applicable" is a better word) based on the temp profiles for a cold powdery snow.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have to love GFS being on an island but you also have to admit the GFS solution is more consistent with our longwave pattern and historical trend of suppressive cold and little phasing/interaction between NS and SS.  That's a huge cold high pressing down on us as verbatim that isn't typically present in setup that results in a miller A coastal riding up and giving the whole MA/NE 6-12+.  Hate to be that guy, but I'd feel a lot better if the GFS starts caving in the next 12-24 hours. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

I mean...that is indeed a hold! Just gotta stay level-headed (good luck with that, lol).

Pinks from Central NC to Upstate NY, and from Montauk to Eastern Ohio and the the western slopes of the Apps. Nice margin for error.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TowsonWeather said:

Pinks from central NC to upstate NY, and from Montauk to Eastern Ohio and the the Wester slopes of the Apps. Nice margin for error.

Might as well root for a bit more amped to put the snow line just south of bob chill’s yard so we get into the heaviest meat at gametime haha

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just saying for many of us in here, the front end portion of the storm on the EC was still a warning level event before the coastal enhancement. SWFE’s around here tend to surprise in a positive direction. Keep that in mind. Idk if you guys remember the forecasts going into Feb 2014, but we obliterated the forecasts on the SWF portion of that storm and exceeded expectations. This storm has that type of potential. That connection of moisture between 925-500mb is incredibly healthy. We just need the general synoptics to hold. This is a southern stream addition we haven’t had in a while. That will make a difference to who gets hit the hardest. 

  • Like 14
  • Thanks 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Pityflakes said:

Have to love GFS being on an island but you also have to admit the GFS solution is more consistent with our longwave pattern and historical trend of suppressive cold and little phasing/interaction between NS and SS.  That's a huge cold high pressing down on us as verbatim that isn't typically present in setup that results in a miller A coastal riding up and giving the whole MA/NE 6-12+.  Hate to be that guy, but I'd feel a lot better if the GFS starts caving in the next 12-24 hours. 

The GFS did start caving - and has been for days. It fully capitulated last night. This is just a brief relapse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NorthArlington101 said:

Gonna be a total weenie here but wish we could get better rates. The longevity of this storm is what makes it impactful for us... along with the "ratios"

ecmwf-deterministic-ma-snow_3hr_10to1-1768910400-1769320800-1769428800-40.gif

I wonder if the rates might be underdone by 10:1 ratios if we get a deep DGZ with moisture. Additionally, it wouldn't surprise me if we get some supper fluffy snow at some points which piles up nice and quick. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m gonna say this right now and you can hold me to it;

 

If you are north of the M/D, your average ratios will likely be >13:1

If you are between I-70 and the M/D and west of the fall line, you’re probably between 11-13:1 average. 
 

East of fall line in that bracket, probably between 10-12:1 ratio average. 
 

South of I-70 and east of the BR, 9-11:1 average with higher than 11:1 in elevations >800’

BR will be 12-15:1 thanks to elevation 

East of fall lines out of I-70 latitude, probably 9-11:1 average with best away from coast. 
 

Im probably missing some areas, but the key word is AVERAGE!! There will be portions that are better for sure, and the EC shows that very well. Classic ratio distribution. Keep this in mind and use QPF to create your own top and bottom ends of your snow range. 

  • Like 11
  • Thanks 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...