Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,445
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Snowman92
    Newest Member
    Snowman92
    Joined

January 2026 Medium/Long Range Discussion


snowfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, bncho said:

It was stuck on hour 66 on TT, Pivotal, and WeatherBELL for about ten minutes.

      Understood, but while that means that it wasn't an issue with the processing on those sites, it's a dissemination issue with the data.   The model chugged along just fine; issues with the actual runs are extremely rare.

  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, high risk said:

      Understood, but while that means that it wasn't an issue with the processing on those sites, it's a dissemination issue with the data.   The model chugged along just fine; issues with the actual runs are extremely rare.

Ahh so it's dissemination! (I remember it saying that when the Euro had an issues a few weeks ago that delayed it for a little while)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4-8" with [mention=18063]SnowenOutThere[/mention] and crew getting about a foot. I'd take this, and most people would be ecstatic with this except Ji.
1006603006_Screenshot2025-12-29at12_18_43AM.png.f55a89926217fd3c20ef48fe64fce846.png

So we’re out to January 14 now? Noted
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • Weenie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ji said:


Use this jb map instead 504860e60558eb3f49cafc923e40ac8d.jpg

That just proves his maps are juiced. But it's not worth arguing about since it'll be changing in 7 hours.

By the way, I  do acknowledge that the flow out of Canada is usually a cold one for us, but interesting nonetheless that it is only slightly BN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That just proves his maps are juiced. But it's not worth arguing about since it'll be changing in 7 hours.
By the way, I  do acknowledge that the flow out of Canada is usually a cold one for us, but interesting nonetheless that it is only slightly BN.

Well, you know that we don’t need severe cold anomalies in January to get snow. In fact slightly below works better
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ji said:


Well, you know that we don’t need severe cold anomalies in January to get snow. In fact slightly below works better

I agree, and I'm not worried about temps. We just need an effin' real slp to track west to east below us or up the coast dropping at least 1/2" of qpf. That's what I'm not seeing. If the pattern advertised by the ensembles is so great, the operationals should be full of those threats, but they're not. And I  think you'd agree with me on that.

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, mitchnick said:

That just proves his maps are juiced. But it's not worth arguing about since it'll be changing in 7 hours.

By the way, I  do acknowledge that the flow out of Canada is usually a cold one for us, but interesting nonetheless that it is only slightly BN.

As the Aleutian ridge dies and the jet extends, western Canada’s major cold pool will get eroded. But once the EPO ridge establishes cross polar flow, it will rebuild quickly. We’re not getting some super charged PAC jet blasting into Alberta and totally torching the continent.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...