Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Category Five Hurricane Lee


WxWatcher007
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, GaWx said:

Are you talking about the US? If so, there are a couple of hits (NE US) in addition to some on SE Canada. The chance of a US hit remains low but there is a chance.

Thats the problem. People just look at where the pretty colored lines go and say "zero hits", "all recurves", "no chance" without acknowledging the spread which still leads to uncertainty.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PackGrad05 said:

Way more spread than 00Z members.  Lots of uncertainty.

Lots of uncertainty about where exactly it will go, which is expected several days out, but really not much uncertainty about whether or not it makes landfall in the US. Doesn't mean zero impact, but it is what it is.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Lots of uncertainty about where exactly it will go, which is expected several days out, but really not much uncertainty about whether or not it makes landfall in the US. Doesn't mean zero impact, but it is what it is.

Agreed 100%. Just so much wish casting from people in here. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rtd208 said:

 

I'm guessing it is a bit like how the no longer mentioned (no longer run?) FSU Super Ensemble works(ed), except it uses either the Euro only or the EPS.  The FSU model supposedly over time 'learned' model biases in certain situations, and then weighed different models with different weights.  If the op or ensemble Euro has a known error mode, I am assuming the program corrects that output as needed.  Side note, the NE shear has obviously relaxed looking at the satellite.  Looks almost like the best outflow is to the NE.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • WxWatcher007 changed the title to Hurricane Lee—75mph/991mb
7 minutes ago, StantonParkHoya said:

They’re virtually identical. Wishcasting for hits is just as bad or worse as wishcasting for a recurve.

There was no wishcasting in that post. And no, they are not virtually identical. You can clearly see the SW shift in location on tropicaltidbits when switching frames. This is an important trend to follow for numerous reasons. Any shift, in any direction, will have repercussions on Lee and his eventual track. More importantly, the farther south Lee tracks it opens the possibility to Lee tracking underneath the trough and potentially stalling.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WxSynopsisDavid said:

There was no wishcasting in that post. And no, they are not virtually identical. You can clearly see the SW shift in location on tropicaltidbits when switching frames. This is an important trend to follow for numerous reasons. Any shift, in any direction, will have repercussions on Lee and his eventual track. More importantly, the farther south Lee tracks it opens the possibility to Lee tracking underneath the trough and potentially stalling.

One is slower… 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Saying there's still a small chance for a NE hit isn't wish-casting. It's the truth because nobody can possibly know with certainty this far out that Lee won't hit there. Do I think it will hit there? No, due to strong odds imo that it won't. Will I say the NE is safe from a hit? No, because there's still a 20% or so chance imo for a hit somewhere in the NE though that % is continually adjusted up and down.
 

 Biases in forecasting, whether bullish or bearish, are common. My goal here is to try to be as objective as possible based on the model data and other facts like history/analogs, try to generate interesting forecasting discussions, etc. This storm isn't even going to come close to directly affecting me way down here barring something really crazy. Furthermore, I wouldn't want this coming anywhere close to here.
 

 On another note, I'd like to know whether or not Sandy is an analog to consider for potential forecasting difficulties regarding the NE US. I don't mean that this is necessarily going to be another storm with as big of an impact as Sandy had should it actually hit. I'm just wondering if the possibility of a left hook into the NE is being considered as a small possibility. Although the Euro did well a week out showing the hook as I recall, other models didn't. So, is this an analog to just consider or not? Opinions?

 IMG_8067.thumb.png.b142a4af517998552d88f36758d37146.png

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with getting a US strike now in the GFS is its forecast position of 96L, which is currently positioned near the Cabo Verdes. The GFS wants to make this a major hurricane (probably Margot) and drive it into 500mb ridging west of the Azores. This breaks down any block faster and keeps Lee away from any interior CONUS cutoff.23dfe556ede730d5ac4abf7f21935c8f.gif

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Windspeed said:

The problem with getting a US strike now in the GFS is its forecast position of 96L, which is currently positioned near the Cabo Verdes. The GFS wants to make this a major hurricane (probably Margot) and drive it into 500mb ridging west of the Azores. This breaks down any block faster and keeps Lee away from any interior CONUS cutoff.23dfe556ede730d5ac4abf7f21935c8f.gif

Yep

That's what is going to make this storm go ots. If it wasn't there then the ridge would hold and the storm would most likely hit the coast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rtd208 said:

Thats the problem. People just look at where the pretty colored lines go and say "zero hits", "all recurves", "no chance" without acknowledging the spread which still leads to uncertainty.

I agree that that's bad because it takes away from objectivity. But equally bad is doing the opposite. I strive for a happy medium of sorts.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep
That's what is going to make this storm go ots. If it wasn't there then the ridge would hold and the storm would most likely hit the coast.
Of course, in IRL, there's also the potential that a future Margot remains weak due to shear. In part by Lee's upper level backside exhaust and a possible ULL that might form, imparting westerly shear. That could keep future potential Margot in check. But oh well, plenty of days left to watch this all unfold.
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Windspeed said:

The problem with getting a US strike now in the GFS is its forecast position of 96L, which is currently positioned near the Cabo Verdes. The GFS wants to make this a major hurricane (probably Margot) and drive it into 500mb ridging west of the Azores. This breaks down any block faster and keeps Lee away from any interior CONUS cutoff.23dfe556ede730d5ac4abf7f21935c8f.gif

That makes sense. But is there an alternative possibility, that of potential Margot helping to pump up the ridge to its NW and then leading to an omega block that forces Lee into the NE like was the case with Sandy? (See my post above showing the omega block that affected Sandy).

 I'll repost the Sandy omega block image:

IMG_8067.thumb.png.e560a6959a9d5cfecedcc9fe28aa88a9.png

  • Like 4
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • WxWatcher007 changed the title to Category Five Hurricane Lee

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...