Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

remnants of zeta and potential first flakes for some areas


forkyfork
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, bluewave said:

 

Looks like the greater strengthening than forecast slightly boosted the SE Ridge enough so Zeta can come further north. It will be interesting to see if some stray wet flakes can make it south of I-80 early Friday before the precipitation cuts off. 

3F11ADF4-4C82-4464-B6D7-4DCBCD4E3503.gif.0bc4b8c3719424f36f1d9c24ed627ae6.gif

53B776A3-4E07-4F21-BEDC-D261B2EE7E93.gif.02cc4f26cd062f36a8807e71aacc866e.gif


 

 

Zeta winds actually up to 105 mph now. Definitely unexpected.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said:

Zeta now at 110 mph.

and now I'm going to go off on the SS scale.  There is literally no reason for Cat 3 to begin at 111 mph.  No one measures winds at this speed- this is a Cat 3.  They need to round out Cat numbers to 5 mph intervals....Cat 3 begins at 110 mph.....no reason for the weird number "111".

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2020/10/28/hurricane-zeta-track-louisiana/

Flight-level winds during a midafternoon Hurricane Hunter reconnaissance flight hit 138 mph; extrapolated down to the surface, that would suggest 101 mph winds at the surface. A dropsonde, or probe, released shortly after found a surface wind of 115 mph in the southern eyewall. That would indicate Zeta is near or at major hurricane status.

The National Hurricane Center did not upgrade Zeta in their most recent advisory, raising the potential that the measurement was suspect. Regardless, Zeta continues to increase in strength and could approach Category 3 intensity as it makes landfall.

 

NHC: 115 mph winds? Naaahhh, we toss

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, snywx said:

 

I think flakes for all N of 84 on friday morning.. Accumulation will prob be for those above 750'. Anyone above 1500' like MSV could see some advisory snows. Still plenty of time for it to be a dud. 

Looks even less likely now. Flakes are still a solid bet but meaningful accumulations are probably all but done at this rate save the elevations. Biggest concern turns into the 1-2" of rain followed right up with a freeze Friday afternoon into the evening: gonna be a problem on the roads I'm sure.

StormTotalSnowWeb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, crossbowftw3 said:

Looks even less likely now. Flakes are still a solid bet but meaningful accumulations are probably all but done at this rate save the elevations. Biggest concern turns into the 1-2" of rain followed right up with a freeze Friday afternoon into the evening: gonna be a problem on the roads I'm sure.

StormTotalSnowWeb.png

I want to see the full 00z suite and even the 06z products then switch to HRRR, this might have an October surprise for some who don't expect it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please follow NWS statements. Otherwise, am glad modeling continues as previously anticipated and adjusted slightly down yesterday. Still differences of opinion and this is related to temp profiles so it's still possible am a little overstated on my expectations but for now...no change from yesterdays early post.  Except... more wind this evening eastern LI where gusts 45 MPH seem possible, and then  a repeat around daybreak Friday.  Will reevaluate later today but for now, that's all I have. Have a fun day... mPING will be helpful tomorrow on mix and phase changes. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, snywx said:

I still think those N of 84 w/ 750’+ elevation see some sort of accumulation. Advisory snows look likely for those above 1500’ in Sullivan/Ulster counties

I like where I sit at 2000'. Wouldn't be surprised to overperform there as is often the case especially in early/late season events.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good Thursday morning again, especially those who want to see some wet snow in the 5 boroughs; - aka NYC.  I'll start with--- I hope the NAM is not misleading me and ends up slightly too cold. It definitely snows with accumulations in the not too distant nw-nne suburbs... 

Whether the CP ASOS records wet snow, or just UP,  I think the city will see at a minimum, a period of a mix of rain and wet snow developing around 10-11AM and then trending to all light rain Noon-2P, then ending.  IF ASOS doesn't see it, it may not be recorded as an official T.  

12z/29 NAM is reconfirming it's recent colder than all models solutions and so while it could still be a NAM slightly too cold scenario, I am leaning NAM, especially since it's closing in on prior GFS-P indicators of 5-6 days ago (I think a fault of the current GFS is that it doesn't handle the BL temps very well in marginal thermal profiles- I think I demonstrated this a couple of time last winter-in advance of a situation in  CHI and elsewhere).  

So,  what i expect after primary ZETA has departed and diminished to light rain-drizzle around midnight, is one or two developing moderate to heavy bands within the general cyclonic flow - approaching 500MB flow generated rain/drizzle. Those should develop over NNJ-se NYS and possibly extreme ne PA around 7-9AM and that will be a transition to a colder BL profile and what I think is gloppy wet snowflakes mixed with rain in NYC ~10-11A and a 7 to 1 or something like snow ratio in the nw suburbs of NYC,  including nw NJ/se NYS and CT.  I've added some 06z NAM time sections and I think you can see where the marginal temps are around 8AM at LGA, then it cools enough at 10-11 AM for a better chance of snow making it down to the ground...not sticking in NYC except maybe roofs/cars--depending on location.  One thing tends to always happen...if it snows for an hour or so, the sfc temp drops to 33-34, no matter the northerly surface wind.

I've also added a modeled banding signature (black band in NJ) that suggests what I'm talking about and seeing in model data.  The snow growth will be briefly decent near 8am Friday in these band's but our temperature profile in NYC at 8AM may still be too warm to see wet snow at that time. 

Screen Shot 2020-10-29 at 10.10.18 AM.png

Screen Shot 2020-10-29 at 10.11.52 AM.png

Screen Shot 2020-10-29 at 10.11.05 AM.png

Screen Shot 2020-10-29 at 10.15.42 AM.png

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, romba said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2020/10/28/hurricane-zeta-track-louisiana/

Flight-level winds during a midafternoon Hurricane Hunter reconnaissance flight hit 138 mph; extrapolated down to the surface, that would suggest 101 mph winds at the surface. A dropsonde, or probe, released shortly after found a surface wind of 115 mph in the southern eyewall. That would indicate Zeta is near or at major hurricane status.

The National Hurricane Center did not upgrade Zeta in their most recent advisory, raising the potential that the measurement was suspect. Regardless, Zeta continues to increase in strength and could approach Category 3 intensity as it makes landfall.

 

NHC: 115 mph winds? Naaahhh, we toss

 

Okay, so riddle me this.  I was watching TWC right before landfall of the mainland.  The coast was already in the eyewall.  Gusts were only around 50 mph on the beach.  I checked the New Orleans Int'l Airport and they registered one 68 mph gust with sustained winds only at 40 mph, at any one point.  How can this be with winds around 110 mph?  Are we really classifying the intensity of hurricanes correctly?  As I found out, the storm surge is probably the most destructive part,  but isn't the the impact at the surface the area to classify?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New NAM is pretty cold and has a period of moderate precip tomorrow with the cold air. Would be nice to see snow tomorrow here even if it won’t be accumulating. North shore hilly areas, colder areas in NYC would have a decent shot I would think, in addition to the northern burbs where snow may actually stick. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More guidance: For those N of the city... again...wet snow so I'd cut the amounts in half for POU... around 1"   The city SREF plume is now down to where I think it should be, nil or 0.1-0.2. Probably melt on contact if it does mix with or change in the city. The banding on the 12z/29 cycle has shifted a little east... so not quite as good a signal but still some action, especially N of I80. I've added a graphic pic for 12z/30... from the 12z/29 SPC HREF... it too can be slightly cold but gives an idea. 

Screen Shot 2020-10-29 at 12.10.30 PM.png

Screen Shot 2020-10-29 at 12.07.38 PM.png

Screen_Shot_2020-10-29_at_12_14.00_PM.png

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Rjay unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...