Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,604
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    eloveday
    Newest Member
    eloveday
    Joined

March 13th ... west Atlantic bombogenesis type low clipping SE New England, more certain ...may be expanding inland


Typhoon Tip

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

A few will.

I love how some question how a track so far east can bury e sne, but if a death band gets pegged over Mitch, people just fawn over it in awe lol

yea I didn't understand that post from him. I know of many times when we get pounded from offshore storms, especially with a CCB like that, its not just banding and we are talking sub 970 with Northern stream energy phasing in. Still think 6-12 CT river to RI Border 12+ east of there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Have you looked?

He has those fronto maps on TT now so he doesn't have to wait for a text from Shabbs. Of course that's just H7 so the banding could be a little west of the best H7 fronto. IOW, the NAM has it west of him. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

People can't have it both ways...its too far east for us, yet no one questions the deformation setting up over the Berkshires.

Fraud logic. 

I could see a massive one to my east (hopefully you get in on that), buries coast, and another , smaller one to the west of me, that helps out CT.

Some lighter, but broader stuff in NY and VT look nice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, dendrite said:

He has those fronto maps on TT now so he doesn't have to wait for a text from Shabbs. Of course that's just H7 so the banding could be a little west of the best H7 fronto. IOW, the NAM has it west of him. lol

Do the best VV line up just west of the frontogenesis?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dendrite said:

He has those fronto maps on TT now so he doesn't have to wait for a text from Shabbs. Of course that's just H7 so the banding could be a little west of the best H7 fronto. IOW, the NAM has it west of him. lol

I saw nice banding over the E 2/3 of CT. Fluff factor 1-2” per hour stuff 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like where I'm at, but I think banding will favor just east and just west of here, and its just starting to show in the models.  Unless we are absolutely bombed under the thick of it, and its not banding much, these things that drop tons over the canal and have ocean enhancement, and then have a midlevel band band further west inevitably select the narragansett bay for their subsidence.  Nothing to complain about, I'm really excited for this as a likely winter send-off.  Driving up 95 to portland after this last storm was a fun time, and I want in on some of that, less the widespread tree snapping.

I'm guessing 9 inches here, with lower ratios in the initial wet thump, and not as generous a reacharound as elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JC-CT said:

Do the best VV line up just west of the frontogenesis?

Sometimes the best forcing with those bands end up higher up...H5-H7. I'll have to look at BUFKIT later as I have to head out. I'm sure Scoot can explain it more and better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dendrite said:

Sometimes the best forcing with those bands end up higher up...H5-H7. I'll have to look at BUFKIT later as I have to head out. I'm sure Scoot can explain it more and better.

Usually just a warm side of that IIRC. But as you said, probably want H7-H5 avg fronto to really nail those bands down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JC-CT said:

a bit self-contradictory unless you hate snow.

No - I love snow, but I've lived here long enough to know that noreasters almost never favor narragansett bay.  All things being equal, this area will almost always underperform areas nearby.  It's not confirmation bias either, it's just geography... statistically borne out. 

So I like generally where I am.  Warning level events this time of year, especially ones with this much upside is playing with the houses money.  Hoping to jackpot here is a recipe for disappointment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

People like to generalize impact by track...but it doesn't always work. Circulations range in size...I can see how the big band would set up west if the circulation is huge...but we need to stop with the too far east crap.

Good example of that was the lingering steady snow after last storm stacked. Elongation of the ULL made all the difference. Everything is unique. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...