NYCGreg Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 I want snow as much as anyone. But does anyone truly believe the NAM is correctly depicting this storm? IMO, it's far more likely the NAM caves to the other guidance this next run than continuing to show big snows in NYC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David-LI Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 "DTVaWeatherman @DTVaWeatherman 2h2 hours ago BLIZZARD WARNING FOR NYC FOR 2-4" or 3-6 " of snow? what a public relations m night mare that will be" Can't believe he just wrote this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sn0waddict Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 I think I'm pulling myself out of this one, good luck to those in NJ/LI though you guys really have a good shot at this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danstorm Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 "DTVaWeatherman @DTVaWeatherman 2h2 hours ago BLIZZARD WARNING FOR NYC FOR 2-4" or 3-6 " of snow? what a public relations m night mare that will be" Can't believe he just wrote this. There is no Blizzard Warning... what a clown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ericjcrash Posted January 21, 2016 Author Share Posted January 21, 2016 "DTVaWeatherman @DTVaWeatherman 2h2 hours ago BLIZZARD WARNING FOR NYC FOR 2-4" or 3-6 " of snow? what a public relations m night mare that will be" Can't believe he just wrote this. I can. He keeps coming in here and trolling us. Saying the euro doesn't have a double barrel low. Just let us take our loss. Hopefully RIC gets screwed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David-LI Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 There is no Blizzard Warning... what a clown. His tweets have an arrogant tone. He replied to Lee Goldberg using words such as bulls**it. Unfollowed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Wiggum Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 "DTVaWeatherman @DTVaWeatherman 2h2 hours ago BLIZZARD WARNING FOR NYC FOR 2-4" or 3-6 " of snow? what a public relations m night mare that will be" Can't believe he just wrote this. He has been on a rant in the MA forum as to why Richmond isn't under a blizzard watch yet other areas are. Woe is him, etc etc.Sent from my XT603 using Tapatalk 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danstorm Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 His tweets have an arrogant tone. He replied to Lee Goldberg using words such as bulls**it. Unfollowed. He's that kind of guy. Abrasive, personal attacks, etc... he's been banned here more than once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdp146 Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 "DTVaWeatherman @DTVaWeatherman 2h2 hours ago BLIZZARD WARNING FOR NYC FOR 2-4" or 3-6 " of snow? what a public relations m night mare that will be" Can't believe he just wrote this. put away your snowblowahs in NYC, Uhkay?..uhhhhh 0-2 inches is a lock.. Back aftah this.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David-LI Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 He has been on a rant in the MA forum as to why Richmond isn't under a blizzard watch yet other areas are. Woe is him, etc etc. Sent from my XT603 using Tapatalk 2 Lol let me guess, that's his BACKYARD? Is he a met or a weenie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jasperk99 Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 I remember it was a 18z NAM run that saved the boxing day blizzard for us. You inspired me to look back at the old threads. (Fun reading btw when you know the result is awesome, going from desperation to glee!) I believe It was actually a 0Z GFS that gave us hope and the 12Z GFS 48 hrs out that hit us and made us all very happy campers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NycStormChaser Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 put away your snowblowahs in NYC, Uhkay?..uhhhhh 0-2 inches is a lock.. Back aftah this.. Judging by his comments here earlier, he doesn't know the definition of a blizzard. Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pazzo83 Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 Judging by his comments here earlier, he doesn't know the definition of a blizzard. Lol DT is a shell of his former self IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 Judging by his comments here earlier, he doesn't know the definition of a blizzard. Lol He may be right that given the population here is so massive a winter storm watch may be more warranted. If they go blizzard warning they hopefully hammer hard the idea that blizzard means nothing as far as snow amounts and it's strictly based off winds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danstorm Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 He may be right that given the population here is so massive a winter storm watch may be more warranted. If they go blizzard warning they hopefully hammer hard the idea that blizzard means nothing as far as snow amounts and it's strictly based off winds Cmon, the public won't hear any caveats... they will simply latch onto the B word... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David-LI Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 He may be right that given the population here is so massive a winter storm watch may be more warranted. If they go blizzard warning they hopefully hammer hard the idea that blizzard means nothing as far as snow amounts and it's strictly based off winds Let's just admit that he's being a weenie because his backyard will see over a foot but they won't issue a blizzard warning for Richmond. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blizzardo Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 Bomb 5 coming up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mophstymeo Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 He's that kind of guy. Abrasive, personal attacks, etc... he's been banned here more than once. He's the Donald Trump of meteorology. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ericjcrash Posted January 21, 2016 Author Share Posted January 21, 2016 Bomb 5 coming up!What does that mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blizzardo Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 What does that mean? The 5th bomb drop from the NAM...lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Computer Guy Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 Not sure how this is all related but couldn't help to think of this... https://youtu.be/5jQUoc3Gyho?t=11s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaPo Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 My neighbor is test running his snowblower outside at the moment. Long Island is jinxed. The NAM run so far is exciting, but the global model consensus and the mets on this board have me convinced this will not be a prolific storm for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mophstymeo Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 If the NAM proves to be remotely correct, I shall christen it the Nearly Accurate Model. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BxEngine Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 Damnit NAM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowDemon Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 Ah, the NAM. As stubborn as ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will - Rutgers Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 This is hilarious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northshore Blizzard Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 I think that the consistency of the NAM over the past 5 or so runs has to give one pause to dismiss. Yes, it's the NAM, but usually you can use that line of thinking when it bounces all over the place from run to run. Then when you are start to see models such as UKMET and SREF's show some healthy returns; well, I'll just saw that it makes for another interesting night of model reading. What's another night of sleep deprivation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F5TornadoF5 Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 This NAM is too much....if only.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowDemon Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 I think that the consistency of the NAM over the past 5 or so runs has to give one pause to dismiss. Yes, it's the NAM, but usually you can use that line of thinking when it bounces all over the place from run to run. Then when you are start to see models such as UKMET and SREF's show some healthy returns; well, I'll just saw that it makes for another interesting night of model reading. What's another night of sleep deprivation? It does give me some pause. Definitely more interested in the GFS in an hour now. But I think most people are perceptive enough not to take it at face value. That said, this is a pretty unpredictable storm, and I feel really, really bad for mets and forecasters in the area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaPo Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 The NAM gave us similar numbers for the bust last year only to reflect the GFS (who called the bust) in later runs just before the storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.