Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,514
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    CHSVol
    Newest Member
    CHSVol
    Joined

Thanksgiving week transient cold shot and the pattern beyond


ORH_wxman

Recommended Posts

For those of you down about the mild weather and the mild outlook, I quote to you from Sidney perley's Historic Storms of New England,

"The winter of 1801-02 was very mild, the month of January being so warm that on the twenty-fourth, the ice on the Merrimack river began to move down the stream, and on the twenty-eight, at Salem, Massachusetts, the thermometer indicated sixty degrees above zero. It was the warmest January that the people remembered. There had been but little snow, and they congratulated themselves upon the pleasant winter and the prospect of an early spring. On Sunday, the twenty-first of February, the aspect of the weather changed. The first part of the day was remarkably pleasant, but the wind soon changed to the northeast and a fierce storm came on. The storm continued for nearly a week, covering the earth with snow and sleet to the depth of several feet. Intense cold prevailed, which produced much suffering among all classes, and caused the sleet to freeze upon the snow. forming a crust so hard and thick that the people, not distinguishing the location of the roads, drove in their sleighs across lots over fences and walls." (page 134)

Thanks, Ginx.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

2nd half of Dec 07 was pretty nice around here. It was January and beyond that blew.

Late Dec '07 kind of stunk...like the final week. Dec 13-Dec 21 was epic though...3 warning criteria snow events at BOS. That Dec 30-31 bust kind ended the month on a sour note, but still a great month. Very tight gradient though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Late Dec '07 kind of stunk...like the final week. Dec 13-Dec 21 was epic though...3 warning criteria snow events at BOS. That Dec 30-31 bust kind ended the month on a sour note, but still a great month. Very tight gradient though.

The 12/30 storm had so much potential but a driving rainer in the end. Then Canada took a dump regarding any cold air and winter only made cameos thereafter. However the 12/23 event was among the great busts in a good way. 12/25 was a rainy day but a deep snowpack ensured a white Christmas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 12/30 storm had so much potential but a driving rainer in the end. Then Canada took a dump regarding any cold air and winter only made cameos thereafter. However the 12/23 event was among the great busts in a good way. 12/25 was a rainy day but a deep snowpack ensured a white Christmas.

I think you are thinking of the 12/16/07 storm....was supposed to be 1-3 then a flip to sleet and rain and a net loss of snow pack fresh from the 12/13 storm...but meanwhile 8" later...We then had the norlun event that dumped another 7"+ on BOS on 12/20...we had about 4-5" out this way. The 12/30 bust was quite painful. 24-36 hours out it looked like a lock for 8-12"...BOS would have destroyed their Dec snowfall record, but instead mustered 0.8" to finish at 27.7" for the month and 0.2" behind the 1970 record of 27.9".

Weeklies def look like a gradient setting up for mid/late December...we'll see how they look as we get closer, but at least we get rid of the Vortex of Death in AK on them which is step 1 in getting a sustained cold pattern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you are thinking of the 12/16/07 storm....was supposed to be 1-3 then a flip to sleet and rain and a net loss of snow pack fresh from the 12/13 storm...but meanwhile 8" later...We then had the norlun event that dumped another 7"+ on BOS on 12/20...we had about 4-5" out this way. The 12/30 bust was quite painful. 24-36 hours out it looked like a lock for 8-12"...BOS would have destroyed their Dec snowfall record, but instead mustered 0.8" to finish at 27.7" for the month and 0.2" behind the 1970 record of 27.9".

Weeklies def look like a gradient setting up for mid/late December...we'll see how they look as we get closer, but at least we get rid of the Vortex of Death in AK on them which is step 1 in getting a sustained cold pattern.

That evolution could be better later in the month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Late Dec '07 kind of stunk...like the final week. Dec 13-Dec 21 was epic though...3 warning criteria snow events at BOS. That Dec 30-31 bust kind ended the month on a sour note, but still a great month. Very tight gradient though.

Didn't the NAO, at least the CPC version of the NAO fail to register below 0.00 once in the entire 90 day period from 12/1-2/28 in 2007-2008? I believe only 1994-95 was the other winter where it did not have 1 day below 0.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't the NAO, at least the CPC version of the NAO fail to register below 0.00 once in the entire 90 day period from 12/1-2/28 in 2007-2008? I believe only 1994-95 was the other winter where it did not have 1 day below 0.

It looks like the daily numbers have it negative from Dec 12-22, 2007...but I think a lot of it was way east based. Heights we well below avg over the Davis Straight and Greenland during that time...there was a big block over the UK and Scandinavia which I guess registered the number a bit negative.

After Dec 22, it only registered negative 4 more days, 0 of them in January.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THE OTHER THING WILL HAVE TO WATCH FOR IS THERE APPEARS TOBE A DECENT SHOT OF CHILLY AIR IN ADVANCE OF THIS SYSTEM. IF THESYSTEM TRACKS FAR ENOUGH SOUTH...IT MAY END UP COLD ENOUGH FOR SNOWACROSS MUCH OF THE REGION. HOWEVER...SINCE WERE DEALING WITH A +NAOIF THE UPPER LEVEL PATTERN AMPLIFIES A BIT MORE IT WILL MAINLY BE INTHE FORM OF RAIN.

Basically rain is more likely but it could be snow if everything goes right. AEEKT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is an aspect about all this that is very abstract, but one that I believe I'm going to wind up spot on about. Albeit virtually impossible to prove, it has to do with cryospheric momemtum - and perhaps equally if not more important, what has been hitting that throttle so hard this autumn. I was thinking perhaps the +AO; while certainly contributory, I don't believe that is the total equation. We saw as recent as 2006-2007 a record late autumn and early winter positive AO phase state but the cryosphere rate that year was less prodigious compared to what is observable now (to date).

The recovery rate has been fast, faster the usual - certainly relative to the current era of background GW. Greater in magnitude than any year to date since the mid 1960s; this, as of last week. Judging by the areal expanse as of yesterday's measure I cannot imagine that trend has alleviated.

If you think it can't turn cold and do so on a dime, guess again - you'd be judging poorly. I'm seeing all that momentum up N, and the CEFS extended flagging a collapsing NOA with rising PNA - those two teleconnectors in tandem with observed cold momentum phenomenon (that is palpable and measurable actually) should have no problem overwhelming the +EPO... Which is somewhat debatable in my mind; it may merely be held erroneously high. (Christ the PDO is against it for crying out loud). As I said before and please take this into consideration: a rising PNA is anti-correlated to a positive EPO.

I think folks just aren't happy unless they see and idealized pattern. You got to think about the totality of the system, however, because the viper isn't always lurking IN the box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is an aspect about all this that is very abstract, but one that I believe I'm going to wind up spot on about. Albeit virtually impossible to prove, it has to do with cryospheric momemtum - and perhaps equally if not more important, what has been hitting that throttle so hard this autumn. I was thinking perhaps the +AO; while certainly contributory, I don't believe that is the total equation. We saw as recent as 2006-2007 a record late autumn and early winter positive AO phase state but the cryosphere rate that year was less prodigious compared to what is observable now (to date).

The recovery rate has been fast, faster the usual - certainly relative to the current era of background GW. Greater in magnitude than any year to date since the mid 1960s; this, as of last week. Judging by the areal expanse as of yesterday's measure I cannot imagine that trend has alleviated.

If you think it can't turn cold and do so on a dime, guess again - you'd be judging poorly. I'm seeing all that momentum up N, and the CEFS extended flagging a collapsing NOA with rising PNA - those two teleconnectors in tandem with observed cold momentum phenomenon (that is palpable and measurable actually) should have no problem overwhelming the +EPO... Which is somewhat debatable in my mind; it may merely be held erroneously high. (Christ the PDO is against it for crying out loud). As I said before and please take this into consideration: a rising PNA is anti-correlated to a positive EPO.

I think folks just aren't happy unless they see and idealized pattern. You got to think about the totality of the system, however, because the viper isn't always lurking IN the box.

I agree, going out on a limb tonight, against modeling and our fine other Pros here. Pattern flips first week of Dec.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is an aspect about all this that is very abstract, but one that I believe I'm going to wind up spot on about. Albeit virtually impossible to prove, it has to do with cryospheric momemtum - and perhaps equally if not more important, what has been hitting that throttle so hard this autumn. I was thinking perhaps the +AO; while certainly contributory, I don't believe that is the total equation. We saw as recent as 2006-2007 a record late autumn and early winter positive AO phase state but the cryosphere rate that year was less prodigious compared to what is observable now (to date).

The recovery rate has been fast, faster the usual - certainly relative to the current era of background GW. Greater in magnitude than any year to date since the mid 1960s; this, as of last week. Judging by the areal expanse as of yesterday's measure I cannot imagine that trend has alleviated.

If you think it can't turn cold and do so on a dime, guess again - you'd be judging poorly. I'm seeing all that momentum up N, and the CEFS extended flagging a collapsing NOA with rising PNA - those two teleconnectors in tandem with observed cold momentum phenomenon (that is palpable and measurable actually) should have no problem overwhelming the +EPO... Which is somewhat debatable in my mind; it may merely be held erroneously high. (Christ the PDO is against it for crying out loud). As I said before and please take this into consideration: a rising PNA is anti-correlated to a positive EPO.

I think folks just aren't happy unless they see and idealized pattern. You got to think about the totality of the system, however, because the viper isn't always lurking IN the box.

Well if the hammer decides to drop, I think it may be one or two up and downs, before coming down, in terms of temps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is an aspect about all this that is very abstract, but one that I believe I'm going to wind up spot on about. Albeit virtually impossible to prove, it has to do with cryospheric momemtum - and perhaps equally if not more important, what has been hitting that throttle so hard this autumn. I was thinking perhaps the +AO; while certainly contributory, I don't believe that is the total equation. We saw as recent as 2006-2007 a record late autumn and early winter positive AO phase state but the cryosphere rate that year was less prodigious compared to what is observable now (to date).

The recovery rate has been fast, faster the usual - certainly relative to the current era of background GW. Greater in magnitude than any year to date since the mid 1960s; this, as of last week. Judging by the areal expanse as of yesterday's measure I cannot imagine that trend has alleviated.

If you think it can't turn cold and do so on a dime, guess again - you'd be judging poorly. I'm seeing all that momentum up N, and the CEFS extended flagging a collapsing NOA with rising PNA - those two teleconnectors in tandem with observed cold momentum phenomenon (that is palpable and measurable actually) should have no problem overwhelming the +EPO... Which is somewhat debatable in my mind; it may merely be held erroneously high. (Christ the PDO is against it for crying out loud). As I said before and please take this into consideration: a rising PNA is anti-correlated to a positive EPO.

I think folks just aren't happy unless they see and idealized pattern. You got to think about the totality of the system, however, because the viper isn't always lurking IN the box.

well the good thing is i don't think (at least not that i can recall) anyone has said "it can't turn cold". but, by the same token, are we talking relative to seasonal averages or relative to the current temperature regime? because in this pattern, when nearly half of the month has seen double digit + departures, "normal" would be "cold"

there's no "happy" or "sad" in this for me, lol, but i just don't see how we get sustained AOB normal temps inside of the next 10 to 14 days. can we run 2 or 3 days here and there, absolutely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless the vortex is removed from AK earlier than progged, I do not see how we attain sustained below avg cold prior to the 2nd week of December...most of the cold shots would be transient and not that impressive.

Yeah I mean it can get cold briefly, but it will take a complete pattern change for sustained cold. I think we all agree that we still can sneak a storm amid a lousy pattern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...