NorthHillsWx Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago One other thing about this system that lends to the idea of it becoming a TS is frictional convergence and the shape of the coastline. This area of coastline is well known for tightening up weak systems on approach. To me this is a lock for our 5th short lived TS… 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowenOutThere Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago Think it looks pretty good to become a TS if it becomes strong enough. It has some surprisingly nice outflow to its south with a good level of anticyclonic spin aloft. Honestly, the limited convection makes it a good study of the cyclonic surface vs anticyclone aloft. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted 10 hours ago Share Posted 10 hours ago 12Z UKMET and other global probably are of little value due to how tiny system is. But fwiw and for the record: 12Z UKMET initializes this as a TD: TROPICAL DEPRESSION 05L ANALYSED POSITION : 28.3N 91.0W ATCF IDENTIFIER : AL052026 LEAD CENTRAL MAXIMUM WIND VERIFYING TIME TIME POSITION PRESSURE (MB) SPEED (KNOTS) -------------- ---- -------- ------------- ------------- 1200UTC 31.08.2026 0 28.3N 91.0W 1013 20 0000UTC 01.09.2026 12 27.9N 92.2W 1012 19 1200UTC 01.09.2026 24 29.2N 93.5W 1012 20 0000UTC 02.09.2026 36 CEASED TRACKING Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxWatcher007 Posted 7 hours ago Author Share Posted 7 hours ago The radar presentation has improved quite a bit in the last few hours. We’ll see if it can develop an inner core quickly. If so, the ceiling rises substantially. 18z hurricane guidance now that there’s recon data on a defined center should be useful. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxWatcher007 Posted 6 hours ago Author Share Posted 6 hours ago Tropical Depression Five Discussion Number 2 NWS National Hurricane Center Miami FL AL052026 400 PM CDT Mon Aug 31 2026 The Air Force Hurricane Hunter aircraft data through early this afternoon showed the low-level circulation of this system gradually becoming better defined, and it was sufficient to designate it as Tropical Depression Five for the 18 UTC intermediate advisory. This is consistent with the improved radar and satellite presentation of the system, with a prominent curved band now evident to the south of the center. The aircraft measured peak 850-mb flight-level winds of 38 kt earlier today, and TAFB provided a T2.0/30 kt Dvorak estimate at 18 UTC. These data support a 30-kt intensity for this advisory. Another Air Force Hurricane Hunter mission is scheduled to investigate the system tonight. The center of the depression lies to the north and east of prior estimates based on the aircraft data and recent surface observations. A low-level ridge over the southeastern United States is steering the system toward the west-northwest (300/5 kt), and this general motion should continue through the next couple of days. The system is expected to move onshore along the northwestern Gulf Coast within the warning area on Tuesday, with the updated 24-h forecast point just offshore. There were no significant changes to the track guidance this cycle, and the updated NHC forecast was adjusted slightly north of the previous prediction mainly due to the repositioning of the center. The tropical cyclone is fairly compact and has a small radius of maximum wind. Although it only has about a day over the very warm Gulf waters, strengthening is expected within a generally low shear environment. Since the small size of the system makes it more susceptible to quicker intensity changes, the NHC intensity forecast has been raised and now lies above almost all of the intensity guidance, including HCCA and IVCN. The legacy hurricane regional models (HWRF/HMON) show even more strengthening than is forecast here. While this does not appear to be the most likely scenario, interests in the warning area are reminded to closely monitor the latest forecast updates. Key Messages: 1. The system is expected to bring tropical storm conditions to portions of the Upper Texas and southwestern Louisiana coasts on Tuesday. A Tropical Storm Warning is in effect from Port Bolivar, Texas, to the Vermilion/Iberia Parish Line, Louisiana. 2. Heavy rain will impact parts of the Upper Texas coast through east-central Texas into far Southwest Louisiana Tuesday and Wednesday as the system tracks inland. Flash flooding is likely across this region, especially in urban areas. River flooding may also be possible. 3. A Storm Surge Watch has been issued from High Island, Texas, to the Vermilion/Cameron Parish Line, Louisiana. Peak values of up to 4 feet above ground level are possible within the watch area. FORECAST POSITIONS AND MAX WINDS INIT 31/2100Z 28.2N 91.5W 30 KT 35 MPH 12H 01/0600Z 28.8N 92.4W 40 KT 45 MPH 24H 01/1800Z 29.6N 93.8W 50 KT 60 MPH 36H 02/0600Z 30.6N 95.2W 30 KT 35 MPH...INLAND 48H 02/1800Z 31.6N 96.1W 20 KT 25 MPH...POST-TROP/INLAND 60H 03/0600Z...DISSIPATED $$ Forecaster Reinhart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthHillsWx Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago Latest HWRF says our first hurricane of 2026 will make landfall on the Tx/La border about this time tomorrow... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthHillsWx Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Pretty serious organizational trend ongoing. Would not shock me to see some significant strengthening soon. This might be one we are posting about “thankfully not having more time over water”. Outflow looks well established and storms are clearly aligning the MLC and newly formed SLC. Starting to see winds ramp up on buoy and oil rig obs too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxWatcher007 Posted 5 hours ago Author Share Posted 5 hours ago Ugh. Short fuse TC development right along the coast. So hard to chase… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott747 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 10 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said: Ugh. Short fuse TC development right along the coast. So hard to chase… Would need to come in around Port Arthur. There's literally nothing between High Island and there besides a little of 87 into Sea Rim Park. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxWatcher007 Posted 5 hours ago Author Share Posted 5 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Scott747 said: Would need to come in around Port Arthur. There's literally nothing between High Island and there besides a little of 87 into Sea Rim Park. I have a bunch of work stuff scheduled, but if this is the real deal I might just try a quick turnaround flight. Radar definitely looks increasingly robust and seeing this kind of organization at this time of the day is intriguing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago It lacks deep convection though. Not impressive on IR...but I do see the well defined circulation on radar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavarreDon Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago https://x.com/tropicaltidbits/status/2094534882815082520?s=46&t=0ZvB_AF2VfA6c0SDxf53yA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthHillsWx Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago I like NHC call if around 50 kts landfall. Don’t think it has time for hurricane intensity unless it can throw up some serious overnight convection, but the overall organization and small circulation definitely favors intensification. That dry air to the north could choke off development, that needs to be watched, but otherwise it has a good look overall 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxWatcher007 Posted 4 hours ago Author Share Posted 4 hours ago 1 minute ago, CoastalWx said: It lacks deep convection though. Not impressive on IR...but I do see the well defined circulation on radar. True, but I think what matters here is that there’s still shallow convection firing around the center. The circulation has continued to become better defined with spiral banding now. Radar definitely helps. A well-timed DMAX burst in the morning with some frictional convergence could help this spin up nicely. Can see that a bit now that HAFS has recon data assimilated now. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boston Bulldog Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago If this thing can fire some diurnal convection it could go boom. Not a small ask with the dry air nearby however 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cptcatz Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago Looks much more like it's about to go poof rather than boom. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavarreDon Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago Welcome to 2026 TS Edouard!. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olafminesaw Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago Dang 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 44 minutes ago, Boston Bulldog said: If this thing can fire some diurnal convection it could go boom. Not a small ask with the dry air nearby however Yeah that’s the other thing. Bit of drier air. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago IR is really looking tough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mob1 Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago Let's see if it can build some convection tonight. Either way, the odds of anything remotely noteworthy coming of this is rapidly diminishing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vortex95 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, WxWatcher007 said: True, but I think what matters here is that there’s still shallow convection firing around the center. The circulation has continued to become better defined with spiral banding now. Radar definitely helps. A well-timed DMAX burst in the morning with some frictional convergence could help this spin up nicely. Can see that a bit now that HAFS has recon data assimilated now. 1010 mb for a c.p. is pushing it for TS-intensity objectively, but Edouard's small size means a tighter gradient hence stronger winds than you would normally expect. Andrew N of PR in Aug 1992 when it was struggling against against an upper level low has a 1015 mb pressure per recon and they still found near hurricane-force winds at FL!, so they kept it at a 40 kt TS, but one could argue it opened up as a trough for a time. You can see dry air entrainment is still an issue (SHIPS diagnoses 700-500 RH of 48% -- anything less than 60% is not good) w/ a sig waning of the deep convection in the last several hours. I am not sure why NHC does not explicitly mention dry air as a mitigating factor. Sure the shear is low and SSTs high, but you need all three solid/favorable for steady intensification or RI. We saw this w/ Lala. They kept saying "conditions generally favorable" repeatedly w/o going into the individual factors, such as dry air to the N and NW w/ a stable stratocumulus field. Yes, Lala intensified, but only slowly. My point is we can do better for details when diagnosing and pronosticaing a TC. Sometimes I think they hedge slightly to avoid anything that makes a system less of a threat on a perception level. I say, tell it like it is in detail objectivity based on the met science alone, no bias either way! And ppl (esp. wx weenies!) want such details I have found since it is not "one-size fits all" for TCs. That's how everyone learns! The finer points and details on wx phenomena that are not immediately apparent or well-known I find the most interesting. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vortex95 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, olafminesaw said: Dang Tiny sucker! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vortex95 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 46 minutes ago, CoastalWx said: IR is really looking tough. "Boring?" Good to see you post elsewhere, not just always on the Weymouth MA...er, I mean New England forum! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxWatcher007 Posted 1 hour ago Author Share Posted 1 hour ago 5 minutes ago, vortex95 said: 1010 mb for a c.p. is pushing it for TS-intensity objectively, but Edouard's small size means a tighter gradient hence stronger winds that you would normally expect. Andrew N of PR in Aug 1992 when it was struggling against an and upper level low has a 1015 mb pressure per recon and they still find near hurricane-force winds at FL!, so they kept it at a 40 kt TS, but one could argue it opened up as a trough for a time. You can see dry air entrainment is still an issue (SHIPS diagnoses 700-500 RH of 48% -- anything less than 60% is not good) w/ a sig waning of the deep convection in the last several hours. I am not sure why NHC does not explicitly mention dry air as a mitigating factor. Sure the shear is low and SSTs high, but you need all three solid/favorable for steady intensification or RI. We saw this w/ Lala. They kept saying "conditions generally favorable" repeatedly w/o going into the individual factors, such as dry air to the N and NW w/ a stable stratocumulus field. Yes, Lala intensified, but only slowly. My point is we can do better for details when diagnosing and pronosticaing a TC. Sometimes I think they hedge slightly to avoid anything that makes a system less of a threat on a perception level. I say, tell it like it is in detail objectivity based on the met science alone, no bias either way! And ppl (esp. wx weenies!) want such details I have found since it is not "one-size fits all" for TCs. That's how everyone learns! The finer points and details on wx phenomena that are not immediately apparent or well-known I find the most interesting. Dry air definitely still looks to be an issue, and that was a clear limiting factor even when this was a lemon. I agree that there's no one size fits all for TCs, which is why the Twitter conversation sometimes gets frustrating because cold top convection does not automatically equal RI. You can see the dry air on the northern flank clearly, and it seems clear that it's having an impact, though I think the expanding outflow on the northern side of Edouard does limit it some. I've always been of the opinion that you need organization before substantial intensification so that's what I look for. Today we've seen substantial progress in that department. We went from a weak and elongated low this morning To a much tighter wind field, with a meaningful pressure drop this evening on the first recon pass of the evening. I still think an overnight/morning convective burst aided by diurnal maximum given the developing inner core should allow for modest intensification, with an added boost from frictional convergence. Like someone else said earlier, I think this is one of those short fuse homebrew cases where we do say if this had more time it could have intensified more substantially. Regardless, it will be interesting to watch given the radar coverage we will have from now through landfall. Tonight I'll be watching to see 1) if the reduction in central convection leads to a collapse in the nascent inner core and if not 2) how soon we see the overnight convective burst I'm expecting. 18z HAFS has that happening around 5am. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattPetrulli Posted 59 minutes ago Share Posted 59 minutes ago 6 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said: Dry air definitely still looks to be an issue, and that was a clear limiting factor even when this was a lemon. I agree that there's no one size fits all for TCs, which is why the Twitter conversation sometimes gets frustrating because cold top convection does not automatically equal RI. You can see the dry air on the northern flank clearly, and it seems clear that it's having an impact, though I think the expanding outflow on the northern side of Edouard does limit it some. I've always been of the opinion that you need organization before substantial intensification so that's what I look for. Today we've seen substantial progress in that department. We went from a weak and elongated low this morning To a much tighter wind field, with a meaningful pressure drop this evening on the first recon pass of the evening. I still think an overnight/morning convective burst aided by diurnal maximum given the developing inner core should allow for modest intensification, with an added boost from frictional convergence. Like someone else said earlier, I think this is one of those short fuse homebrew cases where we do say if this had more time it could have intensified more substantially. Regardless, it will be interesting to watch given the radar coverage we will have from now through landfall. Tonight I'll be watching to see 1) if the reduction in central convection leads to a collapse in the nascent inner core and if not 2) how soon we see the overnight convective burst I'm expecting. 18z HAFS has that happening around 5am. Agreed, think we see 50-55 knots at LF. Would take some pretty good intensification for anything over 65 knots so I doubt it. but wouldn't completely discount it given how small it is. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinook Posted 51 minutes ago Share Posted 51 minutes ago wind gust up to 39kt near Edouard's east side 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattPetrulli Posted 42 minutes ago Share Posted 42 minutes ago 8 minutes ago, Chinook said: wind gust up to 39kt near Edouard's east side Friction helping that core organize a lot in last few scans. Think it comes in east of NHC forecast though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott747 Posted 37 minutes ago Share Posted 37 minutes ago Satellite imagery looks horrible. Radar at least shows some banding on the northern side but overall the southern side looks devoid of much right now. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxWatcher007 Posted 33 minutes ago Author Share Posted 33 minutes ago 3 minutes ago, Scott747 said: Satellite imagery looks horrible. Radar at least shows some banding on the northern side but overall the southern side looks devoid of much right now. 2026 in a nutshell? Yeah. I'm not flying down. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now