Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,639
    Total Members
    25,819
    Most Online
    Donut Hole
    Newest Member
    Donut Hole
    Joined

2026 Mid-Atlantic Severe Storm General Discussion


Kmlwx
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, canderson said:

SPC basically said C MD on south to the piedmonts will be upgraded a level 4 risk. 

You mean in the discussion or did you hear something more specific? I didn't read it that way - it sounded more like they will continue to watch guidance and see what instability looks like. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kmlwx said:

You mean in the discussion or did you hear something more specific? I didn't read it that way - it sounded more like they will continue to watch guidance and see what instability looks like. 

The disco is very bullish and if they mention it they likely go that way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Nomz said:

Yeah he cites the mid-April 2011 NC outbreak, which tends to get overlooked because of what happened later in that month, but it was substantial. I'm pretty sure we got at least TOR watches in the DC area, and of course there was a HIGH risk in NC. I think we were MOD locally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, 09-10 analogy said:

Yeah he cites the mid-April 2011 NC outbreak, which tends to get overlooked because of what happened later in that month, but it was substantial. I'm pretty sure we got at least TOR watches in the DC area, and of course there was a HIGH risk in NC. I think we were MOD locally.

There was a high risk that day in NC... mod risk was south of the LWX CWA looks like

https://www.spc.noaa.gov/exper/archive/event.php?date=20110416

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, yoda said:

Which using the new tables, means CIG 1 60 or CIG 2 45

We will see new tiers of percentages. Remember they now have even higher percentages for wind to account for those days when it's widespread and almost certain - but the max intensity is like 58-65mph. 

I think 60% wind outlooks will become a lot more common with this new outlook strategy. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering the high end potential and anomalous setup I would think this threat alone deserves a thread. It would make it much easier to locate this threat if anyone wanted to read up on it years down the road as I’m sure some of us do for some of our biggest snow storms.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, coastal front said:

Considering the high end potential and anomalous setup I would think this threat alone deserves a thread. It would make it much easier to locate this threat if anyone wanted to read up on it years down the road as I’m sure some of us do for some of our biggest snow storms.

Let's wait and see how things look tomorrow. Again - we have traditionally (at least since the past few years) kept things mostly contained within this thread. 

If there is no reduction in the threat level tomorrow afternoon or evening - perhaps we can do a shorter term obs thread/damage report thread. 

While the potential for a high end event is definitely there - you'd be crazy to assume we are guaranteed a high end event. There are too many failure methods with Mid-Atlantic severe. Would be silly to have a thread that ends up being for a 50-60mph line of gusty storms. 

We've seen many events look robust at day 2 to fizzle the day of - heck even some day 1 big dog potentials have fizzled. 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Kmlwx said:

@mappy - Do you still have you mod powers? If I bump this event to a standalone thread after the afternoon day 2 outlook tomorrow can you pin it? Or I guess @WxUSAF is a mod too right? 

Yea for better or worse, if we go D2 MOD it's probably best to make a thread. We only average a mod risk once every couple of years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Eskimo Joe said:

Yea for better or worse, if we go D2 MOD it's probably best to make a thread. We only average a mod risk once every couple of years.

We do seem to go on "runs" at times. 2008 and 2012 come to mind. Also I still can't believe that College Park in 2001 and La Plata in 2002 were less than 8 months apart. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Kmlwx said:

Let's wait and see how things look tomorrow. Again - we have traditionally (at least since the past few years) kept things mostly contained within this thread. 

If there is no reduction in the threat level tomorrow afternoon or evening - perhaps we can do a shorter term obs thread/damage report thread. 

While the potential for a high end event is definitely there - you'd be crazy to assume we are guaranteed a high end event. There are too many failure methods with Mid-Atlantic severe. Would be silly to have a thread that ends up being for a 50-60mph line of gusty storms. 

We've seen many events look robust at day 2 to fizzle the day of - heck even some day 1 big dog potentials have fizzled. 

I think the value of a thread is to analyze how tends, model runs, increasing/decreasing threat levels and NWS discussions evolved in the days leading up to the event. Regardless if the top end potential verifies it would make it easier to reflect on how a very rare long lead/ high prob severe threat unfolded day by day for future reference. Most on this board will remember a day 4 30% severe prob over an anafrontal coating that had a thread earlier this week lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...