Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,610
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    eloveday
    Newest Member
    eloveday
    Joined

Feb 22nd/23rd "There's no way..." Storm Thread


Maestrobjwa
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, CAPE said:

Work in progress. Now that it has figured out the key upper level features that the GFS has had for many runs now(that no other model has depicted) it should get better. We shall see.

In reality, I think we reach some kind of consensus in one way or another, there won't be some "cave" to either the extreme GFS result or getting nada or snow TV white rain.  The trends this afternoon should certainly lend more confidence to a warning-level snow event I would think, whether the inverted trough is mostly responsible or more coastal action, or some combination.  There is no way in hell we get the GFS amounts of course, but taking all guidance into account (including the latest AI models), you'd have to say an overall 4-6" or so event is now very much on the table.  Obviously that could change a lot either way with later runs, but I like the semi-convergence to SOMETHING decent.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Scarlet Pimpernel said:

In reality, I think we reach some kind of consensus in one way or another, there won't be some "cave" to either the extreme GFS result or getting nada or snow TV white rain.  The trends this afternoon should certainly lend more confidence to a warning-level snow event I would think, whether the inverted trough is mostly responsible or more coastal action, or some combination.  There is no way in hell we get the GFS amounts of course, but taking all guidance into account (including the latest AI models), you'd have to say an overall 4-6" or so event is now very much on the table.  Obviously that could change a lot either way with later runs, but I like the semi-convergence to SOMETHING decent.

At least we got something to track! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, CAPE said:

Significant step towards the GFS imo-

1771754400-7ElKrCaDjSI.png

1771790400-1AdcbyhCX1Y.png

What the fuck. I was doing homework the last hour and played the 18z euro and my jaw dropped. It did the thing where it elongates the NS like the GFS. In my opinion it made an absolutely massive shift at the H5. It just failed to really capture the SW wave and get it as far west. While I think that is still a pie in the sky dream it just went from impossible to "extremely improbable". 

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, T. August said:

For sure, plus that will definitely bounce around a bit. My jackpot comment was in jest, referring to less than 1” in my neighborhood lol. Verbatim it’s a heartbreaker.

A little shift east is all you need to get the goods. 

IMG_0800.jpeg

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check out the precipitation shift between 12z and 18z on the EPS. As PSU mentioned, right here it looks like the coastal being closer helps to intensify the inverted trough. I'm trying to keep expectations in check but it sure feels good to be back in the game for this one!

epsens-qpf_024h-mean-imp-us_ne-2026021912-96.png

epsens-qpf_024h-mean-imp-us_ne-2026021918-90.png

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, mappy said:

Lol was he even alive? And was that a total model failure? I mean obviously tech was what it was (I was in HS). But I do remember the freak out at the 11pm news. 

It was awesome. I stayed up to watch it…it came in like a wall right off the Atlantic. The models were on vacation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SnowenOutThere said:

What the fuck. I was doing homework the last hour and played the 18z euro and my jaw dropped. It did the thing where it elongates the NS like the GFS. In my opinion it made an absolutely massive shift at the H5. It just failed to really capture the SW wave and get it as far west. While I think that is still a pie in the sky dream it just went from impossible to "extremely improbable". 

That's not all it did though. As I said in my reply to your post earlier, that ball of vorticity that comes from the tail end of that vorticity ribbon(that previously was unique to the GFS) then phases back into the ribbon!  IMO that impacts the character of the trough and the strength and proximity of the low to the coast.. Euro is not there quite yet so the next few runs will be very interesting.

  • Like 6
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CAPE said:

That's not all it did though. As I said in my reply to your post earlier, that ball of vorticity that comes from the tail end of that vorticity ribbon(that previously was unique to the GFS) then phases back into the ribbon!  IMO that impacts the character of the trough and the strength and proximity of the low to the coast.. Euro is not there quite yet so the next few runs will be very interesting.

Yep. I personally just focused on the NS and SW interaction as that's where my pay grade is (and without that going right we don't have a storm) but you're right. It was a major concession on pretty much every feature. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, clskinsfan said:

Yeah. But without an inverted trough none of us (except the Eastern Shore) get snow from those LP positions. Although that aligns really well with the past decade. So there is that. 

The low position helps too. The low came west, so did the trough. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SnowenOutThere said:

Yep. I personally just focused on the NS and SW interaction as that's where my pay grade is (and without that going right we don't have a storm) but you're right. It was a major concession on pretty much every feature. 

You are doing fine with the analysis. The improvements have not gone unnoticed.

  • Like 2
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, midatlanticweather said:

Inverted troughs are jumpy. Still has that feel of a rug pull east for the west guys. I think this has always been the risk, just seeing extra precip is good. Of note, 18z Euro also likes to play with our emotions. It did back with the Carolina storm.. Let's see models actually trend. 

Mr pessimist here. 

We don't want to depend on that feature. There will be a narrow area of heavier precip, and more have nots than haves. We want.. fucking need, something close to what the GFS is advertising.

  • Like 1
  • 100% 2
  • clap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mappy said:

FYI, yall… if euro continues to show similar solutions tomorrow and things are a go, we will hide banter. So enjoy it now ITT

I love the sentiment but I think this storm should be a special case. I mean IF this continues to trend well it'll be the first storm in 10 years that trends well inside day 5 and of all possible storms to do so it's some weird coastal miller B during February with a bad airmass. This is the people's storm 

  • Like 1
  • 100% 2
  • clap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SnowenOutThere said:

I love the sentiment but I think this storm should be a special case. I mean IF this continues to trend well it'll be the first storm in 10 years that trends well inside day 5 and of all possible storms to do so it's some weird coastal miller B during February with a bad airmass. This is the people's storm 

Nahh

  • Haha 3
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...