LakePaste25 Posted Friday at 01:31 PM Share Posted Friday at 01:31 PM 1 hour ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: I wouldn't because I think it will be solid. 20 minutes ago, George001 said: I buy that for the mid atlantic but even up here? I’m concerned it will be too warm for sustained winter and we aren’t going to get the nickle and dime events we normally get. 97-98 was not half bad for the Great Lakes/SNE if i remember correctly. December ‘97 was decent here while it was a total shutout in 2015. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnoSki14 Posted Friday at 03:44 PM Share Posted Friday at 03:44 PM 4 hours ago, PhiEaglesfan712 said: People forget that our coldest winter CONUS in the 21st century happened during a strong el nino. The 23/24 Nino was supposed to be very favorable for snows but it ended up being one the warmest/least snowiest. ENSO is still just one factor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted Friday at 03:49 PM Share Posted Friday at 03:49 PM 3 hours ago, GaWx said: Chris, my point is that the summer of 1991 didn’t follow the pattern of the mean of the other 5 as it was net warmer than normal in the E 1/2 of the Conus vs it being colder than normal for the other 5 years averaged out: My sister was born July 18, 1991. I was 8 years old and I remember how brutally hot and humid it was. My mom always talks about how it was so hot when she was born. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted Friday at 03:59 PM Share Posted Friday at 03:59 PM Darwin’s pressure has averaged 1015+ mb, a high pressure for there, for 22 straight days! That’s a new record (back to 1991) that breaks the old record of 20 days that was set during another developing super Nino, July of 2015. I’m expecting that streak to finally end tomorrow. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted Friday at 04:00 PM Share Posted Friday at 04:00 PM 2 hours ago, LakePaste25 said: 97-98 was not half bad for the Great Lakes/SNE if i remember correctly. December ‘97 was decent here while it was a total shutout in 2015. 97-98 wasnt the disaster here that it was on the east coast, but it was one of the last strong Ninos Id pick, only '82-83 was worse. Interesting about '97-98 is that it was front-loaded and Feb was a shutout. mid Nov to mid Dec was actually decent. So was the 2nd half of Jan. Everything else sucked. Shittiest strong Ninos locally: 1982-83, 1997-98, 2023-24 Best strong Ninos locally: 1877-78, 1972-73, 2015-16 At Detroit, the least snowy strong Nino is 1982-83 with 20.0" and the snowiest 45.0" in 1972-73. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted Friday at 04:41 PM Share Posted Friday at 04:41 PM 1 hour ago, michsnowfreak said: My sister was born July 18, 1991. I was 8 years old and I remember how brutally hot and humid it was. My mom always talks about how it was so hot when she was born. Out of the dozens of (pre) El Niño summers, 1991 was the 2nd hottest at Detroit on record with only the pre late developing weak Nino summer of 2018 hotter! The 3rd hottest Nino summer was 2002, which preceded a very snowy and cold winter that was one of the coldest and snowiest moderate or stronger El Niño winters there as you know. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted Friday at 04:43 PM Share Posted Friday at 04:43 PM 52 minutes ago, michsnowfreak said: My sister was born July 18, 1991. I was 8 years old and I remember how brutally hot and humid it was. My mom always talks about how it was so hot when she was born. It was. My daughter was born in August of 91'. My wife remembers it in more detail than me! Lol 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted Friday at 05:24 PM Share Posted Friday at 05:24 PM 15 hours ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said: People think Super Nino means warm too automatically. The NAO/AO play a role, and if you map N. Pacific 500mb anomalies historically with Super Nino's you will see a N. Pacific trough placement in the cold season where it is usually doesn't extend a 2nd wave ridge so far east. Some assume theres some linear connection with the strength of nino and how warm it will be and simply ignore everything else. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormchaserchuck1 Posted Friday at 05:30 PM Author Share Posted Friday at 05:30 PM 5 minutes ago, michsnowfreak said: Some assume theres some linear connection with the strength of nino and how warm it will be and simply ignore everything else. Yeah, the real connection is with global temperatures. A huge trough over the North Pacific is necessarily Winter disaster for the east coast. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted Friday at 06:02 PM Share Posted Friday at 06:02 PM Hot off the press from another source posting the 8/1/26 Cansips run of Nino SST anomalies. It is continuing the CanSIPS run trend of moving the strongest warm SST anomalies further and further east at the ~Nov peak. That’s not surprising because I’ve been suspecting a Modoki bias for it based on the past few years of analyzing it as I’ve posted a number of times here before. The April-June 1st runs had the warmest anomalies near the Dateline/straight Modoki (W based) in the peak month of Nov. Then the July 1st had warmest anomalies in Nov further E near 160W, more of a cross between central based and Modoki. The new Cansips run’s Nov peak shows the warmest anomalies centered near 130W, which would be centered in E Nino 3.4/Nino 3 making it pretty E based. Though this run is not as E based as 1997-8, stay tuned to future runs because the E trend of the strongest anomalies on Cansips from run to run may very well not be done due to this suspected Modoki bias. I can’t post it because the file size is much too large for me to have room in my account. But when it comes out on TT and WxBell, those will be smaller files and thus postable. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted Friday at 06:26 PM Share Posted Friday at 06:26 PM 6 hours ago, GaWx said: Chris, my point is that the summer of 1991 didn’t follow the pattern of the mean of the other 5 as it was net warmer than normal in the E 1/2 of the Conus vs it being colder than normal for the other 5 years averaged out: The summer of 1991 only had a weak El Niño in progress as opposed the strongest on record this summer. July did have some similarity to the composite. But sometimes weaker El Niño summers in the past had more heat than the stronger developing ones. This was the case in 2002 also. So it has been common in the past for weaker El Niños to have less influence in the midlatitudes than during developing super El Niños like 2023, 2015, 1997, 1982, and 1972 which had the more typical cooler summers. The big story this summer is how out of phase the mid-latitudes and tropics are for the magnitude of this event. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted Friday at 07:25 PM Share Posted Friday at 07:25 PM 1 hour ago, bluewave said: The summer of 1991 only had a weak El Niño in progress as opposed the strongest on record this summer. July did have some similarity to the composite. But sometimes weaker El Niño summers in the past had more heat than the stronger developing ones. This was the case in 2002 also. So it has been common in the past for weaker El Niños to have less influence in the midlatitudes than during developing super El Niños like 2023, 2015, 1997, 1982, and 1972 which had the more typical cooler summers. The big story this summer is how out of phase the mid-latitudes and tropics are for the magnitude of this event. Here’s another unusual one: the summer of ‘87 was similarly hot in the E 1/2 of the U.S. overall and El Niño wasn’t just weak as it was moderate to strong that summer: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted Friday at 07:37 PM Share Posted Friday at 07:37 PM OHC is at a new high on this graph: 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted Friday at 07:47 PM Share Posted Friday at 07:47 PM 21 minutes ago, GaWx said: Here’s another unusual one: the summer of ‘87 was similarly hot in the E 1/2 of the U.S. overall and El Niño wasn’t just weak as it was moderate to strong that summer: That was still a cooler summer by recent standards. June-August 1987 71.77°F -0.54°F 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted Friday at 07:52 PM Share Posted Friday at 07:52 PM 6 minutes ago, bluewave said: That was still a cooler summer by recent standards. June-August 1987 71.77°F -0.54°F But the summer of 1987 was hot based on the climo centered on the period it was within as I posted. Why are you comparing it to more recent (hotter) climo that makes it not seem as hot? Also, the hottest was in the E 1/2 of the US regardless of what climo you use. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormchaserchuck1 Posted Friday at 08:02 PM Author Share Posted Friday at 08:02 PM Yeah, I thought we were talking about ENSO. 1987 is a really good find, as that was one of the most El Nino Summers on record, JJA ONI was +1.5c, all time record for JJA is +1.6c Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted Friday at 08:05 PM Share Posted Friday at 08:05 PM 24 minutes ago, GaWx said: But the summer of 1987 was hot based on the climo centered on the period it was within as I posted. Why are you comparing it to more recent (hotter) climo that makes it not seem as hot? Also, the hottest was in the E 1/2 of the US regardless of what climo you use. It wasn’t even a hot summer for the cooler 1980s era. The warmest 1980s summer was 1988 and the 2nd warmest 1980. This current July is close to the warmest July on record. So there really isn’t a comparison to the summer of 1987. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormchaserchuck1 Posted Friday at 08:16 PM Author Share Posted Friday at 08:16 PM +9c has popped in the subsurface on TAO/Triton for the first time of this event! It's warming pretty rapidly too, we may see a +10c in a couple of days. That's +18F, so if the water is usually 62F, it's now 80F. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted Friday at 08:37 PM Share Posted Friday at 08:37 PM 31 minutes ago, bluewave said: It wasn’t even a hot summer for the cooler 1980s era. The warmest 1980s summer was 1988 and the 2nd warmest 1980. This current July is close to the warmest July on record. So there really isn’t a comparison to the summer of 1987. I thought the discussion was regarding El Niño summers. What relevance does throwing La Nada or Niñas into the mix have? Subtle deflect however. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted Friday at 08:46 PM Share Posted Friday at 08:46 PM 11 minutes ago, mitchnick said: I thought the discussion was regarding El Niño summers. What relevance does throwing La Nada or Niñas into the mix have? Subtle deflect however. Deflect from what? 1987 had a summer pattern that was a reasonable match for El Nino expectations.This summer is completely different. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted Friday at 09:02 PM Share Posted Friday at 09:02 PM 19 minutes ago, bluewave said: Deflect from what? 1987 had a summer pattern that was a reasonable match for El Nino expectations.This summer is completely different. 1. Why are you using 1991-2020 for climo for a 1987 summer? That diminishes the above normal H5 in the E US on your 1st map. 2. The highest height anomalies/warmest temp annomalies are in the E US, regardless. How is that El Ninoish? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowman19 Posted Friday at 09:30 PM Share Posted Friday at 09:30 PM 3 hours ago, GaWx said: Hot off the press from another source posting the 8/1/26 Cansips run of Nino SST anomalies. It is continuing the CanSIPS run trend of moving the strongest warm SST anomalies further and further east at the ~Nov peak. That’s not surprising because I’ve been suspecting a Modoki bias for it based on the past few years of analyzing it as I’ve posted a number of times here before. The April-June 1st runs had the warmest anomalies near the Dateline/straight Modoki (W based) in the peak month of Nov. Then the July 1st had warmest anomalies in Nov further E near 160W, more of a cross between central based and Modoki. The new Cansips run’s Nov peak shows the warmest anomalies centered near 130W, which would be centered in E Nino 3.4/Nino 3 making it pretty E based. Though this run is not as E based as 1997-8, stay tuned to future runs because the E trend of the strongest anomalies on Cansips from run to run may very well not be done due to this suspected Modoki bias. I can’t post it because the file size is much too large for me to have room in my account. But when it comes out on TT and WxBell, those will be smaller files and thus postable. The CANSIPS is playing catch up to the CFS and the EURO. It’s very likely not done strengthening this event even further, it was way too weak to start out with and very good call with its “Modoki bias”. I agree that it’s not done adjusting this to an east-based event either. The CFS just got even stronger with the traditional ONI and RONI. The EURO is guaranteed to get stronger as well, with its new update on 8/5 @LakePaste25 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternLI Posted Friday at 10:06 PM Share Posted Friday at 10:06 PM I would also like to see a recurving typhoon or two as @so_whats_happening very astutely brought up. That's another thing I'm keeping my eye's on. I feel like we will, sooner or later. Unfortunately nothing much on the radar for that currently. There's only this dubious TC that forms on the heels of typhoon Dolphin. All models show this system too, this is the euro below. Some want to recurve it, some don't. If it did, I might think of it as a baby step. I'm thinking the autumn could bring better chances though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmillzz Posted Friday at 10:16 PM Share Posted Friday at 10:16 PM 1 hour ago, GaWx said: 1. Why are you using 1991-2020 for climo for a 1987 summer? That diminishes the above normal H5 in the E US on your 1st map. 2. The highest height anomalies/warmest temp annomalies are in the E US, regardless. How is that El Ninoish? The negative height anomalies near the Gulf of Alaska, together with the core of the strongest negative height anomalies over northeastern Canada, look reasonably Nino-like to me. Summer ENSO teleconnections are much weaker and noisier than in winter, so I wouldn't expect a textbook composite. Given that, the broad pattern still seems fairly consistent with a mature El Nino. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormchaserchuck1 Posted Friday at 10:29 PM Author Share Posted Friday at 10:29 PM Closing in on +4c in Nino 1+2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternLI Posted Friday at 11:45 PM Share Posted Friday at 11:45 PM Let's do a comparison as things stand currently wrt SST's. Here's this year followed by the other strong/super el nino's going back to 82-83. Below is this year currently, followed by the others in reverse chronological order. Obviously, the globe is getting warmer over time. Naturally, sst's would follow suit. Is anyone disputing that fact anymore? I don't really see anyone doing that but not the point of this post. One can clearly see things warming over time. I've been floating around on these boards for a very long time now. There used to be discussions from very wise mets in the enso threads of yore on how actual sst's should be viewed and pondered. Not only the anomalies. So I'm posting the actual sst's as comparison. Looking at it this way, 97-98 and 87-88 stick out to me a little more so than the others. Again, not because of the actual readings compared to each other. Rather, the positioning of the warm pool biased east. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted Friday at 11:47 PM Share Posted Friday at 11:47 PM 5 hours ago, GaWx said: Hot off the press from another source posting the 8/1/26 Cansips run of Nino SST anomalies. It is continuing the CanSIPS run trend of moving the strongest warm SST anomalies further and further east at the ~Nov peak. That’s not surprising because I’ve been suspecting a Modoki bias for it based on the past few years of analyzing it as I’ve posted a number of times here before. The April-June 1st runs had the warmest anomalies near the Dateline/straight Modoki (W based) in the peak month of Nov. Then the July 1st had warmest anomalies in Nov further E near 160W, more of a cross between central based and Modoki. The new Cansips run’s Nov peak shows the warmest anomalies centered near 130W, which would be centered in E Nino 3.4/Nino 3 making it pretty E based. Though this run is not as E based as 1997-8, stay tuned to future runs because the E trend of the strongest anomalies on Cansips from run to run may very well not be done due to this suspected Modoki bias. I can’t post it because the file size is much too large for me to have room in my account. But when it comes out on TT and WxBell, those will be smaller files and thus postable. No one thought it was right with a straight Modoki in the seasonal mean. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted Saturday at 12:05 AM Share Posted Saturday at 12:05 AM 22 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: No one thought it was right with a straight Modoki in the seasonal mean. The maps I was basing my post on were from weathermodels.com and were using 1991-2020 for base climo. But since I posted that, the WxBell Aug 1st version came out. It uses 1981-2010 for climo. WB had the warmest anomalies centered in Nov near 180 for the April-June 1st runs and significantly further E (near 160W) for the July 1st run. WB (using 1981-2010 base) has its Aug 1st Nov warmest centered near 150W, which is C based/basinwide and not E based like weathermodels.com’s (1991-2020 base) 130W. So, the WB 1981-2010 base version also moved E, but not nearly as far as the weathermodels 1991-2020 base version, which has it all the way E to 130W (pretty E based): WB 7/1/26 SSTa run for Nov (1981-2010 base) centered ~160W WB 8/1/26 SSTa run for Nov (1981-2010 base) centered ~150W 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted Saturday at 12:13 AM Share Posted Saturday at 12:13 AM 5 minutes ago, GaWx said: The maps I was basing my post on were from weathermodels.com and were using 1991-2020 for base climo. But since I posted that, the WxBell Aug 1st version came out. It uses 1981-2010 for climo. WB had the warmest anomalies centered in Nov near 180 for the April-June 1st runs and significantly further E (near 160W) for the July 1st run. It has its Aug 1st Nov warmest centered near 150W, which is C based/basinwide and not E based like weathermodels.com’s 130W. So, the WB 1981-2010 base version also moved E, but not nearly as far as the weathermodels 1991-2020 base version, which has it all the way E to 130W (pretty E based): WB 7/1/26 SSTa run for Nov (1981-2010 base) centered ~160W WB 8/1/26 SSTa run for Nov (1981-2010 base) centered ~150W It's bad enough current SSTA vary from different products/sources, now we have models prog depictions following along. No wonder there's rarely agreement on forecasts...or on this Board! Lol 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted Saturday at 12:44 AM Share Posted Saturday at 12:44 AM 38 minutes ago, GaWx said: The maps I was basing my post on were from weathermodels.com and were using 1991-2020 for base climo. But since I posted that, the WxBell Aug 1st version came out. It uses 1981-2010 for climo. WB had the warmest anomalies centered in Nov near 180 for the April-June 1st runs and significantly further E (near 160W) for the July 1st run. WB (using 1981-2010 base) has its Aug 1st Nov warmest centered near 150W, which is C based/basinwide and not E based like weathermodels.com’s (1991-2020 base) 130W. So, the WB 1981-2010 base version also moved E, but not nearly as far as the weathermodels 1991-2020 base version, which has it all the way E to 130W (pretty E based): WB 7/1/26 SSTa run for Nov (1981-2010 base) centered ~160W WB 8/1/26 SSTa run for Nov (1981-2010 base) centered ~150W I think these changes are entirely immaterial with the degree of warmth throughout ENSO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now