Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    19,016
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    loganboehmewx
    Newest Member
    loganboehmewx
    Joined

2026-2027 Record-breaking El Nino


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

No it isn't, since the PDO has yet to respond to said record breaking El Niño.

It’s September. Other than CTKWs going up the west coast which takes care of a portion of the PDO, how else would an extratropical index flip without cool season extratropical storms? You need storms and an active cool season zonal jet to churn up that warm blob out in the middle of the N pac. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, LakePaste25 said:

It’s September. Other than CTKWs going up the west coast which takes care of a portion of the PDO, how else would an extratropical index flip without cool season extratropical storms? You need storms and an active cool season zonal jet to churn up that warm blob out in the middle of the N pac. 

That isn't my point.....I'm not saying that it necessarily should have flipped by now, but considering what has gone on over the course of the past decade, nothing is a foregone conclusion with respect to to the PDO. I'm with you on that, but it's not a non-issue, as you seem to imply.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, LakePaste25 said:

Like yeah…the PDO might alter pacific storm tracks, but it’s on the scale of 0s to 10s of miles, not 100s to 1000s. Same way that Canadian snow cover might force baroclinicity southward, so an individual snowstorm might track over the turnpike rather than I-80. But it’s not going to stop a cutter from going to the Ohio valley. It’s a bit ridiculous that the PDO is being discussed so much in this thread when you actually have a record breaking Nino that *will* actually alter the long wave pattern by *thousands* of miles. 

Thank you 

People are overthinking the winter

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

No it isn't, since the PDO has yet to respond to said record breaking El Niño.

yea but it will once the aluteian low gets going in mid to late northen fall

also even if it didnt that wouldnt meaningfully affect the winter fcst 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ensonerd1233e343 said:

yea but it will once the aluteian low gets going in mid to late northen fall

also even if it didnt that wouldnt meaningfully affect the winter fcst 

I think so, as well...however, that isn't the absolute certainty that it was 20-30 years ago.

If you don't feel as though the development of a massive Aleutian low would affect the winter forecast, then I'm not sure what to tell you...you are essentially disregarding the extra tropical influence of ENSO, which isn't particularly wise during the strongest event in recorded history. I couldn't disagree more, especially considering how the entire Pacific basin has been predisposed to a cool ENSO orientation for the past decade. Take a look at winter 2023-2024 and consider how that winter would have been different with a bonafide Aleutian low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 CFSv2 progs for relative Nino 3.4 trimonthly peak continue to cool significantly as the overall flatness of Nino 3.4 still persists (much longer than earlier progged on the models for 3.4):

Mean of runs Aug 4-13: OND +3.5 (when the progged peak was at a peak)

IMG_2357.thumb.png.0af09cd3f5f53de47068ddf62faa94db.png
 

Mean of runs Aug 14-23: OND back down to +3.25

IMG_2358.thumb.png.54297c8f8c843a6ea62f97b9836eef41.png

Mean of runs Aug 24-Sep 2: OND down even further to +3.1! It hasn’t been this low since the 10 day means of late June:

IMG_2356.thumb.png.8c70df5c43526892d5289a5db20e3ff2.png

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am usually lethal with ENSO forecasting, but I will say that the unparalleled magnitude of this El Nino is really posing a challenge for me with respect to any forecast precision beyond the blanket "super-El Nino designation. I am someone who exhaustively parses data to come up with analogs to inform future intensity forecasts and it makes it difficult given that this one is in a class of one.

Def. take my exact numbers with a grain of salt this year.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Consistent with OISST, the August relative ERSST anomaly for Nino 3.4 just came out and it also shows a rather mundane warming in August vs July compared to the near record breaking rapid warming of ~1C that several models had been showing. The Nino 3.4 anomaly warmed by only 0.34:

2026   6   1.07
2026   7   1.33
2026   8   1.67

 It had been earlier progged to be >+2 for August. For example, check out this June 13-22 mean CFSv2 prog for August: +2.3, which was notably above what verified:

image.thumb.png.110bdee693e725ced76de224193bbedf.png
 

 How does August of ‘26 compare to other very warm Nino Augusts since 1950? It’s very warm but still wasn’t the warmest as 1997 was 0.18 warmer. Had it warmed to +2+ like had been progged, August would have easily been the warmest on record:

2026 +1.67

2015 +1.58

1997 +1.85

1987 +1.27

1982 +0.93

1972 +1.47

1965 +1.57

1957 +1.36


https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/Rnino34.ascii.txt

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/3/2026 at 9:38 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Regardless of the total picture, there exists absolutely astronomical, extraordinarily high potential during shorter intervals that belies what should be a mild seasonal mean....the devil is in the details and it's easy to miss the period when all hell broke loose when you only view a snapshot composite of a winter's life. Almost akin to considering a middle-aged guy like me....46 yrs, old, decent career, 4 beautiful children and an aggregate of circumstances that embodies a ho-hum mid-life...sure, but when viewing a 46-year composite mean, it's easy to miss the US Marine that collected 2 OUIs and came within a toad's whisker of having it all end long before any of my kids were even so much as a glint in my eye.

This is an excellent point. Concentration on the seasonal mean is absolutely pointless for the individual weather events. Hell even the warmest winter of my lifetime, 2023-24, had a 10 day stretch of brutal winter weather. It can go both ways of course (a cold winter can be boring). But any weather enthusiast who is too preoccupied with a likely seasonal mean has done a disservice to his hobby that got him here in the first place.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, michsnowfreak said:

This is an excellent point. Concentration on the seasonal mean is absolutely pointless for the individual weather events. Hell even the warmest winter of my lifetime, 2023-24, had a 10 day stretch of brutal winter weather. It can go both ways of course (a cold winter can be boring). But any weather enthusiast who is too preoccupied with a likely seasonal mean has done a disservice to his hobby that got him here in the first place.

Most anomalous snowfall of my life occurred in April 1997, which was an otherwise bottom-dwelling season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nino 1+2 (keep in mind that this is non-relative) had a strong rise yesterday. Get ready for a tweet from Adam, Abraham, and/or others addressing this saying record breaking yada yada yada. Keep in mind though that records from 1982-3 and 1997-8 are based on weeklies, not dailies. Also, highest relative WEEKLY in 1983 was +4.6 and in 1997 was +4.1. Let’s see where the current calendar week relative 1+2 on Monday. It won’t be anywhere near +4.6 although it may get close to +4.0.

IMG_2364.thumb.png.78fe725482a6818ded9cff924e88510e.png

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, GaWx said:

Nino 1+2 (keep in mind that this is non-relative) had a strong rise yesterday. Get ready for a tweet from Adam, Abraham, and/or others addressing this saying record breaking yada yada yada. Keep in mind though that records from 1982-3 and 1997-8 are based on weeklies, not dailies. Also, highest relative WEEKLY in 1983 was +4.6 and in 1997 was +4.1. Let’s see where the current calendar week relative 1+2 on Monday. It won’t be anywhere near +4.6 although it may get close to +4.0.

IMG_2364.thumb.png.78fe725482a6818ded9cff924e88510e.png

 

 

Fortunately, for those interested in the winter, it covers the smallest area and sits south of the equator but for the northern border bounded by it. Hence, at this point, whether it exceeds current max records or not, it won't have much to say for winter in the east compared to the other areas. So yeah, let's get the record this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GaWx said:

 CFSv2 progs for relative Nino 3.4 trimonthly peak continue to cool significantly as the overall flatness of Nino 3.4 still persists (much longer than earlier progged on the models for 3.4):

Mean of runs Aug 4-13: OND +3.5 (when the progged peak was at a peak)

IMG_2357.thumb.png.0af09cd3f5f53de47068ddf62faa94db.png
 

Mean of runs Aug 14-23: OND back down to +3.25

IMG_2358.thumb.png.54297c8f8c843a6ea62f97b9836eef41.png

Mean of runs Aug 24-Sep 2: OND down even further to +3.1! It hasn’t been this low since the 10 day means of late June:

IMG_2356.thumb.png.8c70df5c43526892d5289a5db20e3ff2.png

is that because of a weaker nino or a more east based nino?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mitchnick said:

Waxing and waxing of earth's temps. Nbd

Normally waxing and waning isn't at a rate of 1C in 50 years. 5C was all the difference between glaciers over NYC and modern climo, and that took thousands of years. Not out of the question that we clear a similar gap within the next 100 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cobalt said:

Normally waxing and waning isn't at a rate of 1C in 50 years. 5C was all the difference between glaciers over NYC and modern climo, and that took thousands of years. Not out of the question that we clear a similar gap within the next 100 years. 

I neither care nor worry about it. Plenty of other more important things in this world imho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mitchnick said:

I neither care nor worry about it. Plenty of other more important things in this world imho.

Well yeah, because your generation won't be the one to see the worst consequences of such a temperature jump. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cobalt said:

Well yeah, because your generation won't be the one to see the worst consequences of such a temperature jump. 

I have children and grandchildren. Still don't worry about it. Like I said, too many other things imho that are going to "get us." lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...