Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,603
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    masonj4
    Newest Member
    masonj4
    Joined

“Cory’s in LA! Let’s MECS!” Jan. 24-26 Disco


TheSnowman
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

Who do folks get so wild about the NWS maps? They’re not the governing voice and it’s well known they rip and read the HREF/ NBM

I'm not a met and I'm not nearly as knowledgeable as most in here.  But for me, NWS has historically been what I considered the most objective forecast source, not focused on ratings or hype or profit.  They took the data and made a forecast based on an educated interpretation of that data, and explain their rationale in the discussions.  

What is the NBM?  The discussions I read seem like they are written and signed by specific employees.  

  • Like 1
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

Who do folks get so wild about the NWS maps? They’re not the governing voice and it’s well known they rip and read the HREF/ NBM

Why do you bring this up every single time NWS/NOAA is discussed?  They are a group of mets like any other, putting out a forecast.  Your criticism is valid, but the subtle undertones of your wording are noted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dryslot said:

It has the last 3 runs of all modeling.

Also looks like the duration has increased. Last night they were saying a start here at 5 PM and now they’re saying 3 PM. But I think it’s gonna be more like 12 or one because that usually happens with these kinds of storms. But they have it snowing until early evening Monday so they are thinking more than 24 hours. I imagine along the coast or closer to the coast where you are, the duration could be even longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wx_observer said:

I'm not a met and I'm not nearly as knowledgeable as most in here.  But for me, NWS has historically been what I considered the most objective forecast source, not focused on ratings or hype or profit.  They took the data and made a forecast based on an educated interpretation of that data, and explain their rationale in the discussions.  

What is the NBM?  The discussions I read seem like they are written and signed by specific employees.  

National Blend Of Models. It takes certain models and blends them all together 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bristolri_wx said:

Why do you bring this up every single time NWS/NOAA is discussed?  They are a group of mets like any other, putting out a forecast.  Your criticism is valid, but the subtle undertones of your wording are noted.

I find the office up here, GYX, it’s pretty darn good. Sometimes I think they’re going to be way off and then in the end their forecast is usually on target

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mahk_webstah said:

Also looks like the duration has increased. Last night they were saying a start here at 5 PM and now they’re saying 3 PM. But I think it’s gonna be more like 12 or one because that usually happens with these kinds of storms. But they have it snowing until early evening Monday so they are thinking more than 24 hours. I imagine along the coast or closer to the coast where you are, the duration could be even longer.

If it starts sooner it will end sooner too, Its all relevant with the duration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bristolri_wx said:

Why do you bring this up every single time NWS/NOAA is discussed?  They are a group of mets like any other, putting out a forecast.  Your criticism is valid, but the subtle undertones of your wording are noted.

Subtle undertones? Not sure what you’re insinuating. Just making a valid observation. No more , no less . 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, moneypitmike said:

What a weenie run.  Shoud we be uding the kuch?  J never knoe when ine us more useful than the ither.

 

Can you pist a qpf one?  Tia

This is going to be in the 14-15:1 range up here for most of the duration.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was tempted to think we might be more like 12 to 16 but I have seen on a number of the precipitation outputs that they are are lower numbers in the Merrimack Valley like often happens due to banding to our south or north. So I’m also thinking about 10 to 14. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mahk_webstah said:

I was tempted to think we might be more like 12 to 16 but I have seen on a number of the precipitation outputs that they are are lower numbers in the Merrimack Valley like often happens due to banding to our south or north. So I’m also thinking about 10 to 14. 

I think this is a good opener for GYX.

mapgen.png

  • Like 1
  • 100% 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, dryslot said:

I think this is a good opener for GYX.

mapgen.png

Euro got better up here, CMC is fairly steady, but icon took a big step towards the GFS which makes me nervous. I'm fine with 6-8 inches and would be thrilled, less than that and it'll be pretty depressing, haha. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, EastonSN+ said:

When's the last time Maine stole North Carolina's snowstorm?

More sleet further north on the models this morning. 2 days to go for northern trends - sleet's to Mains lol?

Why I think 10-14” is the max in swct. We’ll Be seeing the sleet line make ir’s way to the pike by tomorrow…

  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, EastonSN+ said:

When's the last time Maine stole North Carolina's snowstorm?

More sleet further north on the models this morning. 2 days to go for northern trends - sleet's to Mains lol?

Doubt we would see sleet up here with this airmass but i wouldn't rule it out further south, I know what the tendencies are in these.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheMainer said:

Euro got better up here, CMC is fairly steady, but icon took a big step towards the GFS which makes me nervous. I'm fine with 6-8 inches and would be thrilled, less than that and it'll be pretty depressing, haha. 

I have no concerns to what the ICON has, But the GFS has been slowing ticking the qpf up for us, Also need to keep in mind, This is going to be some high ratio fluff so you can get more snow with less qpf.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...