Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,443
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Snowman92
    Newest Member
    Snowman92
    Joined

Ice Ice Baby December 28-29 Storm Discussion


Baroclinic Zone
 Share

Recommended Posts

Let’s talk about impending ice storm. Feel likes it been awhile since we’ve had one in New England.

Some models showing up to 0.50” up in C/NNE. Down in SNE, effects don’t; seem as bad but will impact travel.

We will likely see power outages with winds expected as a strong cold front pushes through after this storm exits northeast.

3km 18z NAM

IMG_0451.png.116f7e25e3a8f40547b4c7f9018e11f2.png

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Baroclinic Zone said:

00z HRRR hitting icing hard. Still long range for it but something to monitor.

 

I do appreciate that.  1 inch of ice is worse than 3 feet of snow in many cases.  I do not feel that the local stations are mentioning this event past a minor nuisance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ineedsnow said:

Dew of -4 hopefully we can keep temps down later.. NAM kind of tame compared to the HRRR.. HRRR has a bunch.more qpf.. guess we see how this trends

It will definitely warm over 40 south of 90.. but models are always too fast in eroding the cold in these . It happens but not as fast as they show. Especially with no screaming winds . I’d bet the valley stays in the 30’s till fropa 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wx2fish said:

Skeptical of the HRRR, but verbatim the 12z run is 3/4" qpf as freezing rain across SNH. My guess is it’s a little too cold, and itll be a faster rise to around 32 for many. But, something to montior today. 

I also don’t think the accretion will be overly efficient in this type of setup. When the cold layer is so shallow like this, the liquid drops are not as supercooled so they won’t freeze as quickly on contact. In icing events where we have robust cold up into the 925-950 layer, that’s when the accretion is usually much more efficient. It prob will start pretty icy but then then it will get pretty marginal.  

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

I also don’t think the accretion will be overly efficient in this type of setup. When the cold layer is so shallow like this, the liquid drops are not as supercooled so they won’t freeze as quickly on contact. In icing events where we have robust cold up into the 925-950 layer, that’s when the accretion is usually much more efficient. It prob will start pretty icy but then then it will get pretty marginal.  

Do you think it’s a pack wiper ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The SN/IP zone in Maine kinda gets bullied by the WAA…not something I like to see for going big ice in CNE. HRRR has MHT below 32° for the entirety…hard sell on that. I think it’s underestimating the diabatic latent warming and the lack of Tip’s +PP. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

Do you think it’s a pack wiper ?

I dunno, I really think it depends how long temps are above 40F…in your area to my area, there’s a decent chance it wipes the pack. Prob gonna be 12+ hours of 40+ dews.
 

Not a lot of water in the pack either (though my bottom layer from 12/23 is kind of dense). Western CT up into ORH county might keep it though as they spend less time above 40F. If we had like an inch of water in the pack then this wouldn’t wipe it out, but this is not that type of pack. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...