Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,496
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RHiggins
    Newest Member
    RHiggins
    Joined

January 2026 Medium/Long Range Discussion


snowfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Currently NWS forecast for this storm for Magnolia Delaware 

Saturday

A chance of snow. Partly sunny, with a high near 23. Chance of precipitation is 30%.

Saturday Night

A chance of snow. Mostly cloudy, with a low around 9. Chance of precipitation is 30%.

Sunday

A chance of snow. Partly sunny, with a high near 21. Chance of precipitation is 40%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, GreyHat said:

Would a stronger L like 991 push noth?

Disclaimer: I'm not the expert at upper level analysis by any means

[Edited to remove a sentence that demonstrated that fact]

But this doesn't look quite like the "HECS" look that supports a low that strong though its a very good pattern

eps_z500a_namer_23.thumb.png.7aff42210f190141346d9c52e9e75814.png

This is -EPO, -NAO, with a neutral looking PNA with the ridge offshore. The -EPO delivers arctic air while the -NAO stops the storm from cutting NW. 

This looks like it would support, at the upper potential, an overrunning event like Jan 2010 or... Dec 2018 (you all would love that if it had been 100 miles north) with widespread double digits totals, but not the 18-24"+ totals that would be "historic". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ephesians2 said:

Disclaimer: I'm not the expert at upper level analysis by any means

But this doesn't look quite like the "HECS" look that supports a low that strong though its a very good pattern

eps_z500a_namer_23.thumb.png.7aff42210f190141346d9c52e9e75814.png

This is -EPO, -NAO, with a neutral looking PNA with the ridge offshore. The -EPO delivers arctic air while the -NAO stops the storm from cutting NW. But for a truly historic storm it would seem like we'd need the ridge a few hundred miles east which would push the trough southeast over the TN valley and phase with the subtropical energy and create a stronger storm. 

This looks like it would support, at the upper potential, an overrunning event like Jan 2010 or... Dec 2018 (you all would love that if it had been 100 miles north) with widespread double digits totals, but not the 18-24"+ totals that would be "historic". 

Thanks, here to observe and learn, the days of doorman, PSU and others from the different forms was always a great reading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GreyHat said:

Thanks, here to observe and learn, the days of doorman, PSU and others from the different forms was always a great reading.

Well IMO he's partially right, the -NAO obviously helps but it's mainly because a 1050 high squashes everything

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just woke up. I’ll summarize… models basically held. We’re on the northern part of the precip shield, which could help our ratios and h700 fgen forcing. Cold high is starting to weaken (was probably overdone).

And I’ll address this:

9 minutes ago, Ephesians2 said:

Disclaimer: I'm not the expert at upper level analysis by any means

But this doesn't look quite like the "HECS" look that supports a low that strong though its a very good pattern

eps_z500a_namer_23.thumb.png.7aff42210f190141346d9c52e9e75814.png

This is -EPO, -NAO, with a neutral looking PNA with the ridge offshore. The -EPO delivers arctic air while the -NAO stops the storm from cutting NW. But for a truly historic storm it would seem like we'd need the ridge a few hundred miles east which would push the trough southeast over the TN valley and phase with the subtropical energy and create a stronger storm. 

This looks like it would support, at the upper potential, an overrunning event like Jan 2010 or... Dec 2018 (you all would love that if it had been 100 miles north) with widespread double digits totals, but not the 18-24"+ totals that would be "historic". 

in this specific case, move that pna ridge a few hundred miles east, and we’ll suppress this thing all the way to the gulf. The EPO is so strong that we need a little SE ridging to give us a good overrunning event. It’s not the same thing as a bomb cyclone HECS, but overrunning with lots of cold can produce a lot of snow if strong enough. 

  • Like 10
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

KEY MESSAGE 2...The potential for a possibly significant winter
storm has increased for this weekend, but uncertainty remains.

The upper air pattern resembles what appears to be a very
favorable pattern for a winter storm somewhere in the eastern
U.S. heading into this weekend. Before that, a potent cold
front pushes through the region late Thursday into Friday,
followed by a reinforcing Arctic front late Friday into
Saturday. This will lead to increasingly cold conditions each
day from Thursday through the entire weekend. Well below average
temperatures are forecast, especially by Sunday. In addition,
some upslope snow showers are possible with each front.

By the end of the week and especially heading into the weekend,
the upper-level pattern becomes quite active in both the
northern and southern branches of the jet stream. Model guidance
is still very much all over the place in regards to exactly
what comes of this, but there is growing consensus for an area
of low pressure developing across the south-central/southeastern
CONUS. Depending on when and where that area of low pressure
develops, as well as where it goes after it does develop, there
could be significant wintry precipitation across our area
sometime next weekend. Uncertainty remains with this system, as
there is some potential that strong Arctic high pressure could
suppress the system south. However, that high (~1040 mb Arctic
high) is also a source of very cold air; this likely remains in
place due to a favorable -AO/-NAO blocking pattern. Meanwhile,
there are an increasing amount of ensemble members that bring
significant wintry precipitation to the region due to an
amplified southern stream influence - something we have seen
very little of so far this winter (typical of La Nina). The low
may not escape as easily out to sea given the -NAO block. The
nearby steady source of very cold air and the amplified southern
stream occurring in tandem are what raise some red flags for
significant wintry precipitation potential this weekend.

The latest ensemble guidance is certainly on the upward trend
in that regard, but that doesn`t mean it can`t swing back in the
other direction. It will be key to monitor this threat closely
in the coming days as the different parts of the system become
better sampled by surface and upper air obs. Current model
spread indicates an axis of significant snow/ice could be as
far north as Upstate New York, or as far south as the Carolinas.

Bolded some key parts of the afd  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Terpeast said:

Just woke up. I’ll summarize… models basically held. We’re on the northern part of the precip shield, which could help our ratios and h700 fgen forcing. Cold high is starting to weaken (was probably overdone).

And I’ll address this:

in this specific case, move that pna ridge a few hundred miles east, and we’ll suppress this thing all the way to the gulf. The EPO is so strong that we need a little SE ridging to give us a good overrunning event. It’s not the same thing as a bomb cyclone HECS, but overrunning with lots of cold can produce a lot of snow if strong enough. 

My thinking is similar to yours. Personally I think we’re in a pretty good spot as of now considering that the AI GFS/Ukmet are almost too far north. Main thing I want to see out of today is the Euro and Euro ai to hold and have the CMC and GFS come closer to that solution. I think the way we get that is have the pv to our northeast be a bit less intense or (better yet though less likely) have a stronger low. That said, I wouldn’t want models to all suddenly jump way north today but just show increasing confidence a total miss to the south is unlikely.  

  • Like 2
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, the Euro AI was almost dead on at D5. It took the Euro longer to get there for yesterday's event.

Tonight's runs will be 5 days out. If the Euro AI continues to show similar solutions I see very little reason why not to believe it.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, bncho said:

FWIW, the Euro AI was almost dead on at D5. It took the Euro longer to get there for yesterday's event.

Tonight's runs will be 5 days out. If the Euro AI continues to show similar solutions I see very little reason why not to believe it.

The one caveat, which is hard to evaluate, is whether the high pressure (and associated upper level configuration) will be so anomalous, that the AI will, by its nature, not predict it.  The AI models are trained on some amount of reanalysis, and so they can't/won't predict extreme or record-breaking events well.  Will this setup be record-breaking?  Hard to say.  But that's something to keep in mind when evaluating the AI models vs the physics-based models.  

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

The one caveat, which is hard to evaluate, is whether the high pressure (and associated upper level configuration) will be so anomalous, that the AI will, by its nature, not predict it.  The AI models are trained on some amount of reanalysis, and so they can't/won't predict extreme or record-breaking events well.  Will this setup be record-breaking?  Hard to say.  But that's something to keep in mind when evaluating the AI models vs the physics-based models.  

I desperately want to hang my hat on the fact that extreme record-breaking events are just that. We will know soon enough i suppose

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are two possible outcomes for this event:
1. A major ice storm affects southern CAD zones, and DC and points north get a major snowstorm. (Euro AI, UKMET, GFS AI, Euro)
2. A major snowstorm affects southern CAD zones, and DC and points north receive little to nothing. (GFS, CMC)

What do we know of each model?
The Euro AI is often locked onto an event inside D5 and is often deadly inside that range, but can be locked onto an incorrect solution, only to fold 48 hours before the event (credit to @high risk). It also often has a QPF bias. 
The Euro often tends to overamp low pressure systems, but it also tends to hold back energy in the Baja. It also often has a QPF bias.
The GFS tends to show more suppressive, progressive solutions, and often tends to verify NW.
The CMC has a major cold bias, and tends to overdo Arctic HPs. It also, generally, has a suppressive bias, but it is less prominent than the GFS.
The UKMET tends to struggle on thermals, often being too warm. It also tends to overamp systems.
Since the GFS AI is new, I don't know much about it.

Although more operational models (that I'm aware of; I have no idea what Google's model outputs) support the northern solution, ensembles have been trending colder and snowier towards the southern solution over the last 24-36 hours. This is why I am skeptical to declare victory for the northern solution just yet.

It would be easy to go with the Euro AI, just because that has been the best performing operational this winter inside D5. However, a major caveat to this is that the upcoming HP may be so anomalous that it hasn't received enough training data to output the correct solution, just due to its inexperience (credit to @WxUSAF). This should be a good test for the AI Euro.

Now, it's too early to declare anything, but I am leaning towards the northern solution. 1050 HPs are extremely rare and often overdone in setups like these (credit @Terpeast), and I don't think it'll be able to suppress it enough. However, if a ultra-strong HP does pan out, the Euro AI may have a greater probability of being wrong.

Stay tuned...

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 0z and 6z Euro Ens essentially look the same wrt precip/snowfall at 6z on Sunday, outside of run to run noise. There is no 'trend'. I am going to trust the Euro more overall for this potential event given how crappy the GFS has performed recently. I will lump the AI models in with the GFS/GEFS based on their performance with our recent (mostly Non) event.

  • Like 3
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CAPE said:

The 0z and 6z Euro Ens essentially look the same wrt precip/snowfall at 6z on Sunday, outside of run to run noise. There is no 'trend' I am going to trust the Euro move overall for this potential event given how crappy the GFS has performed recently. I will lump the AI models in with the GFS/GEFS based on their performance with our recent (mostly Non) event.

The MSL pressure field actually shifted north in the TVA on 6z vs 0z eps. Mostly noise, but the shift was noticeable. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...